Difference Between Espionage And The Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment makes people in American feel safe and secure. David Sirota author of “Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?” says,"a few years after it aired the director of national Intelligence admitted illegal surveillance was still taking place"(understand). " the Government’s unverified assertion that it has halted “systemic” illegal/unconstitutional surveillance by the National Security Administration." says David Sirota author of “Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?”(Understand). Sirota also states "The NSA is admitting that even with an outdated 1997 supreme court ruling it knows it cannot post mass collect metadata with no warrants whatsoever.
Billy is on the phone with Bob while they are talking on the phone and someone coughs and it is neither of them. Well, the government are the only ones who can hack phones and listen to phone calls, the 4th amendment has allowed this to happen. The 4th amendment has gavin the right to law enforcement to be cruel and unfair about a search and seizure. Without a warrant you cannot search a person, well not anymore, the government can search anyone at any time in some scenarios. Normally, there is an abundant amount of evidence used to be given the permission to search one’s belongings, but since 9/11 law enforcement needs little evidence to be provided a search warrant.
Two months later, in June 1917, the United States Congress passed and president Woodrow Wilson signed the Espionage Act, which defined espionage during wartime. In May 1918, the Sedition Act was enacted; thus, greatly expanded the meaning of the Espionage Act. This series of law, known collectively as the Espionage and Sedition Acts, restricted some civil liberties and raised great disputes. “Was Wilson right in passing the Espionage and Sedition Acts?” and “To what extent is it acceptable to limit a citizen’s civil liberties during wartime?”
It is far more dangerous to attempt to gag the people than to allow them to speak freely. If the Espionage Law stands, then the Constitution of the United States is dead. American institutions are on trial here before a court of American citizens. The future will render the final verdict (Foner, Voices of Freedom, Document
The moment that the Twin Towers fell in New York, America became destined for change. In the wake of these attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was quickly passed through congress, and signed by then-president, George W. Bush. The act itself gives the FBI and other government agencies the ability to do and use certain methods, many of which are already used by other law enforcement organizations, to help prevent future terrorist attacks. Since then, this piece of legislation has been the center of much debate and controversy. But, there is ample reason to believe that the Patriot Act is needed and effective.
Protection against warrantless search and seizures is another protection the 4th Amendment provides. The government must get a warrant or court order from a federal judge before they can see who someone called, see how long the call was, and listen to the call. Apple is at war with the government because Apple encrypts everything on there phones, so no one else can see your personal information. There are reports written for public viewing when they are caught doing illegal and unconstitutional spying. The 4th Amendment also protects against destruction of personal property during a warrantless
We need to discuss whether this law violates civil liberties and freedom of speech. The First Amendment protects the rights of the people to speak, write, and assemble. While the Espionage Act was made to protect national security. President Woodrow Wilson warned of disloyalty in his speech in 1915. But the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech also implies a balancing act between national security efforts and the severely important protection of individual liberties.
The whole point of the Fourth Amendment is not to completely stop the police, because the amendment can be waived if an officer has a warrant, or a person’s consent. The Fourth Amendment states that generally a search or seizure is illegal unless there is a warrant, or special circumstances. Technically stating that a citizen is protected by the Fourth Amendment, until a government employee gets a warrant, and then they can invade a citizen’s privacy. Also people state that the FISA Court’s warrants are constitutional, but the NSA’s surveillance is unconstitutional. Even though people do not like the NSA’s surveillance, the NSA is legal because the FISA Court that the people did not mind makes it legal.
The fourth amendment can be beneficial but, it can also to some U.S. citizens be invasion of privacy. The fourth amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” some U.S. citizens believe that Law Enforcement, the Government and the NSA are violating the required guidelines of the Fourth Amendment. The NSA is conducted a mass U.S. surveillance not to believe specific individuals may be engaging in terrorist activity, but instead to believe all of us may be engaging in such activity. The government mass surveillance proves that U.S. citizens are considered suspects at all times. With the Patriot Act the NSA has access to
To begin, we need to understand the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment was created to prevent the government from breaching into our homes and convicting us of crimes based on evidence they discover within our homes. It was vital to state unreasonable searches in the constitution, and an unreasonable search is a search done without
National Security and Violations of Civil Liberties National security has been a hot button topic issue for over a decade. After 9/11 President bush rolled out the Homeland Security Act and the USA PATRIOT Act. Part of the USA PATRIOT Act includes allowances for the NSA to surveil and collect data on American citizens. This issue gained notoriety and national attention when Edward Snowden came forward with information about how the NSA was collecting information from Verizon everyday on phone numbers in the U.S. and out.
“The NSA is not listening to Americans ' phone calls or monitoring their emails” (Does the Government). As the government states they are permitted to collect any Americans communications The Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, for instance the police cannot search personal properties. Due to the definition of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” it makes people feel secure (Legal Information). In addition, it prevents all irrelevant searches that are not useful.
Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.
The fourth amendment clearly states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” (“NSA Spying on Americans is Illegal” np). This means that people’s houses or personal belongings cannot be searched without a court order or probable cause, deeming spying by the government unconstitutional. Adding to this, there are three laws that explicitly state that it is illegal to spy on people, one of them being under title 50 saying “A person is guilty of an offense if he intentionally engages in electronic surveillance under color of law except as authorized by statute” (“NSA Spying on Americans is
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. The U.S. government uses their power to surveillance citizens to prevent terrorism, however this invades their privacy. This act infringes people’s rights, therefore it is unconstitutional. They constantly watch, track, listen to, investigate, and scrutinize citizens. This is similar to what is done in the novel Nineteen-Eighty Four by George Orwell.
More about Difference Between Espionage And The Fourth Amendment
David Sirota 4th Amendment Analysis
150 Words | 1 PagesShould The 4th Amendment Be Stricter?
167 Words | 1 PagesEssay On Was Wilson Right In Passing The Pilgrimage And Sedition Acts
1013 Words | 5 PagesHow Did The Espionage And Sedition Acts Affect Society
1042 Words | 5 PagesPatriot Act Pros And Cons
953 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Protection Against Warrantless Search And Seizures
97 Words | 1 PagesShould The United States Pass The Espionage Act Of 1917
502 Words | 3 PagesArgumentative Essay: Should The NSA Surveillance
169 Words | 1 PagesViolating The Fourth Amendment
210 Words | 1 PagesArgumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment
427 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of National Security
1878 Words | 8 PagesBenefits Of The Fourth Amendment
752 Words | 4 PagesArgumentative Essay On Civil Liberties
1030 Words | 5 PagesNSA Spying
932 Words | 4 PagesGovernment Privacy In Nineteen-Eighty Four By George Orwell
354 Words | 2 Pages