ipl-logo

Difference Between Federalist And Anti Federalists

963 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Difference between federalist anti federalist esay

For many people, we don’t really talk about this topic often, or at all depending on the person, so none of us really know the difference(s) between the two. Federalists believe that all power is controlled by the national government. They prefer that a single person lead the executive branch and they believed that the Constitution didn’t need the Bill of Rights. However, they are in the wrong. In my opinion, the anti-federalists aren’t as strong-minded as the federalists would be in the government, they would have better control in the direction they wanted their government to go: either have a tyrant rule and control the entire United States, or let the people have a say in what they want in a government and have the government actually take …show more content…

Anti-federalists questioned whether the new Constitution would lead to the security of the rights of the Americans or the destruction of them. A person under the name Brutus asked the question that all Americans wondered: “Could a widely dispersed and diverse people be united under one government without sacrificing the blessings of liberty and self-government?” This lead to the creation of the first anti-federalist paper, which is based off of Brutus’ question. I agree with him because since the United States was becoming more diverse at the time, it was important to base the government off of the people, not the powers controlling …show more content…

I do not agree with the federalists. However, it’s not all about me. Some people do support the federalist’s opinions and ways of setting up government. One of the authors, John Jay, believed that some form of government is necessary in a society and that all forms of government must be granted sufficient power to regulate conflict and administer new laws. “A strong sense of the value and blessings of union induced the people, at a very early period, to institute a federal government to preserve and perpetuate it (Jay). I agree with this statement, but I don’t agree with the arguments supporting this statement, especially since it’s based on the federalist’s point of view. He goes to elaborate on why the United States is already united. The navigable rivers connect the states through trade. He also goes to say that we worshiped the same God, come from the same land, speak the same language, have similar manners and customs, and believe in the same principles of government. I definitely don’t agree with this because in the future, it wasn’t like that anymore. Since immigration started, the country has been getting more diverse in culture, language, religion, and governmental views. This sums up the concept of the second paper of the federalist

Show More
Related
744 Words | 3 Pages

(This goes before the main argument) The main Argument between the Anti-Federalist and the Federalist was about the amount of control/authority that the government should have. Though the people were now the governing body there was not much protection and liberties that they were entitled to. James Madison did not want to risk the constitution not being ratified; he drafted the Bill of Rights. Even though the Anti-Federalist Failed to prevent the ratification of the U.S. Constitution led to what we know as the Bill of Rights, the ten amendments that protected the

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

"–Federalist No. 51

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists favored a strong central government, and favored limiting the state powers, and thought 2 representatives from each was enough. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and put together by the desire for a powerful, centralized government. Their leaders were usually influential men like George Washington & Benjamin Franklin. They were advocates of an orderly, competent government that could protect their economic status.

Read More
1864 Words | 8 Pages

According to Saul Cornell, the struggle between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist over the constitution is one of the “greatest political struggles in American history”. (Cornell, 2012) From what I gather the men who were called the Anti-Federalist are the real Federalist because they cared about the rights of the people and wanted to protect them from an all-powerful government and give more power to the states to care for their own people. They believed that citizens should be included in decisions and that when they weren’t included into decision making procedures the government would become detached from their citizens. (Borowiak, 2007).

Read More
2365 Words | 10 Pages

The Anti-Federalists suggested that the new system would threaten liberties, and all freedom would be lost with the Constitution because of how much power it granted the federal government. The Federalists, on the other hand,

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists and the Anti federalists have a lot of arguments, and that is why America can be developed and become to more powerful in the world. First of all, the Federalists are the people who support the present relationship between the federal government and governments of the fifty states, which came into effect with the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787. On the other hand, the Anti federalists are those who oppose the current political structure. The tussle between these two groups can be traced back to the 18th century, when the committee which met to revise the Articles of Confederation concluded that its revision was not feasible and the entire constitution had to be rewritten. The Civil War was a fight to preserve the

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

2). Whereas The Anti-Federalists movement was led by Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, and Samuel Adams in which they strived to create a strong executive similar to a monarchy in which there were fewer limitations on popular participation. Then we had the Federalists, which consisted of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison,and John Jay. Together they created and strived for a set of beliefs that checks and balances could protect against abuse, ultimate protection of property rights, and stressed the weakness of articles; indicating that a strong government was needed to protect the nation and solve domestic

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Federalist party are people who strongly agree to the thought of the constitution and they argued to immediate ratification of the constitution. James Madison along with Alexander Hamilton favored the constitution and argued their case against the Anti Federalist which were people who wanted to keep a monarchy country. I stand strongly on the side of the Federalists. A strong central government has been exceptionally beneficial to our country. The Anti-Federalists wanted to keep a monarchy government when the Federalists wanted to see a change in our country.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views about the U.S. Constitution and how the government should have been organized. While the Federalists sought after a stronger national government and wanted to ratify the Constitution “as is”; the Anti-Federalists favored a stronger state government and a weaker national government. When the U.S. Constitution was presented to the Anti-Federalists, they were not necessarily against the U.S. Constitution, however, they wanted to incorporate a couple of additions to ensure that the national government would not gain too much power over the people. Due to the discourse between the two, they came up with a compromise and added the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. The Bill of Rights was

Read More
339 Words | 2 Pages

Question 3: “Federalist or Antifederalist? Pick one (or neither) and then defend your position.” Answer: After the passage of the Constitution in 1787, a fierce debate erupted between those who support a strong, national government, known as the Federalists, and those who opposed the creation of a central government that would have more power than the states, known as the Anti-Federalists. I chose the Federalist, and here’s why: In the Anti-Federalist view, the creation of a strong, national government would seem unreasonable.

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

One of the greatest conflicts between federalists and anti-federalists is the lack of Bill of Rights in order to hold limitation of power to the government. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton. The federalists were the first political party of the United States government. Federalists agree with the Constitution, and worked to convince the States to ratify it. The group of essays, known as the Federalist Papers were created in aid to gain encouragement of ratification by Alexander Hamilton as well as James Madison.

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

When it comes to the Constitution which our nation will follow for the years to come it is extremely important to make sure this government is set up the way we want it to be. The federalists believe in a central government which is then broken down into separate branches which will eventually be selected by the people. The anti-federalists wanted to have a weak government which we already tried through the articles of confederation and that was a absolute fail. They want it to be ran by the states and we know that will not work. the only good thing they could add to the conversation is the Bill of Rights.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

… (Madison, 1787)”. James Madison had been trying to defend the weaknesses of the constitution and clarify its strengths which were not strengths in the sight of the anti-federalists. Eventually, the federalists were able to persuade several of the anti-federalists too through their essays and papers. Among all the anti-federalist papers, Brutus 15 is a very important one. It is an antifederalist paper that hits on the weakness of the US constitution and the growing power of the government.

Read More

More about Difference Between Federalist And Anti Federalists

Open Document