ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

433 Words2 Pages

The Anti-federalist,didn't hate the federalist they just didn't agree with them in some points. They just were in favor of the states having more power than they did.Anti-federalist focused on the bill of rights and equality. They were worried that the constitution didn't equally divide power among the three branches of government.They were also concerned about giving the federal government power to regulate commerce. The anti-federalist wanted to improve the equality in the government this is clear with this quote "As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety". The anti-federalist believed that the constitution needs the bill of rights to protect people individual rights. The federalist were a strong central government .They wanted a strong leader and they wanted the separation of powers as stated in the federalist quote."It is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others."–Federalist No. 51 …show more content…

They wanted a more centralized government. They had an open mind and wanted people's voice to be heard.In federalism the power is constitutionally divided between a central government and that of states or provinces.Each level of the government has its’ own obligation and power.It's different from Confederations because it gives the federal systems the central authority some amount of control over its citizens, thus endowing it with a level of sovereignty. The anti federalist in the other hand wanted more rights for the states they believed in a strong state and a very minimalist federal government, they focused on the bill of rights whereas the federalist focused on the

Show More
Related

Explain What Objections To The Constitution Were Held By Such Anti Federalists

918 Words | 4 Pages

The Anti-Federalists thought that one specific set of rules for the whole population would not fully represent everyone’s rights. Furthermore, the Anti-Federalists thought that if a government took place far from the people, they would no longer represent

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Anti-Federalists

172 Words | 1 Pages

The federalist was all for changing the Articles of Confederation and creating a strong government while the Anti-federalist were against changing the system they wanted to fix the main problem. The anti-federalist believed that the states should continue to have power over the government. Both the federalist and the anti-federalist

Read More

Similarities Between Checks And Balances

423 Words | 2 Pages

They were passionate that the Constitution created a strong executive authority and that the president could easily become king by being reelected pver and over again. They also wanted a Bill of Rights specifically protecting citizens from the national government. Anti-federalists wanted fewer limits on political participation by all citizens. They didnt want the Constitution to go into effect, hoping that nine states wouldnt ratify it. Federalist and Anti-federalist depended on Virginia's vote since it was a big powerful state and smaller states would follow behind.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

744 Words | 3 Pages

(This goes before the main argument) The main Argument between the Anti-Federalist and the Federalist was about the amount of control/authority that the government should have. Though the people were now the governing body there was not much protection and liberties that they were entitled to. James Madison did not want to risk the constitution not being ratified; he drafted the Bill of Rights. Even though the Anti-Federalist Failed to prevent the ratification of the U.S. Constitution led to what we know as the Bill of Rights, the ten amendments that protected the

Read More

Federalism Vs Ratification Dbq

138 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong national government to provide order and protect the rights of the people. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists, which included many patriots, such as Patrick Henry and John Hancock, opposed ratification because the Constitution shifted the balance of power

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

1006 Words | 5 Pages

The anti-federalists feared a strong government because it posed a threat to the people rights and that the president could be a king. I find that the federalist camp more appealing because they realized the weakness of the Confederation and tried to improve it such as the Judicial court system. There was no system of courts in the national government, the courts were dependent on the other states. This also made it that the states can ignore the national law without any consequences because the Congress has no way to enforce its own law. But the constitution helps the Congress to establish a national court system.

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Lead To The Constitutional Convention

490 Words | 2 Pages

The differences between the federalists and the anti-federalists is the federalists like a central government while the anti-federalists like a small weak government. The constitutional convention was held and the federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation while the anti-federalists

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

Read More

Note On Speeches Debating The Consitution From The NY Ratification Convention

846 Words | 4 Pages

Overall, the British government was a tyrannical rule in which the ruling and decisions were all up to one person, King George III. Since the United States had previously already had to go through a terrifying event that was the British government, the Anti Federalists wanted to learn from their mistakes and avoid a government that would possess unmanageable power which would lead to corruption within the system and oppression for the people under the rule. Secondly, the Anti Federalists had also debated that there was a lacking of a Bill of Rights, which would protect the freedom of the people and make sure that the government would not overstep boundaries. With the current path that the Constitution was following the Anti Federalists feared the downfall of the United States, with all three of the branches of the new central government threatening all of the beliefs and ideals that the Anti Federalists had followed. Not only was there a lacking of power and representation for the people in the state there was also a lack of representation in the Central government for the people in order to speak out against the ratification of the constitution.

Read More

Comparing Views Of The Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

355 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti federalists wanted a Monarchy, but this would cause trouble. Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the same Monarchy government, this would cause trouble because it is proven that monarchy causes violence between government and people. In monarchy the people would have no say in their country on the higher class would have a say. Federalists were also against having an army. Brutus

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

706 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti-Federalists wanted the people to elect their representatives, because they believed that it would allow a sense of security for the people since the congress already had so much power over them. The people repeatedly told the state legislature that they would never submit to an authority that is not elected by themselves. They had the idea that the state legislature would elect subservient to their own desires, not the people's. If the elected representatives are representing the people, then the people should choose who they want to be represented by. The Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the state legislature to elect representatives because they believed that “politicians should elect politicians.”

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Arguments Against The Federalist Party

454 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalists were a group of people that wanted a national government to be all as one instead of states having their own government. The anti-federalists were the ones that disagreed with having a national government. They thought that the select state should have power over itself in everything they did. The Federalist Party was an important part of

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

649 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti- Federalists also believed that the United States should just stay with the Articles of Confederation and wanted to prevent creating a federal government that could develop into a very dominant and overpower individual’s rights. They were also afraid that the Constitution would create too much power in the

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

619 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists want a strong government and strong executive branch. The Anti-Federalist oppose the Constitution. They didn’t want to give up any of their state's’ power. The Articles of Confederation are a written document that establishes a function of the national government in the United States. The Constitution is saying that we people are guaranteed certain basic rights, have a national government and have fundamental laws.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

Open Document