Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation were in need of a change. The document was a failure because the United States weren't able to raise money and pay for troops. The founder’s ideas of how the country should be ran all varied. The biggest disagreement was the representation of big vs. small states, this introduced two plans, the New Jersey and Virginia Plan. The New Jersey Plan, which was supported by the Anti-Federalists, supported small states while the Virginia Plan, which was supported by the Federalists, supported big states. The Federalists were people who wanted to completely throw away the Articles of Confederation and write a new document whilst the Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation and amend it. The three debates

The Anti-Federalists wanted the people to elect their representatives, because they believed that it would allow a sense of security for the people since the congress already had so much power over them. The people repeatedly told the state legislature that they would never submit to an authority that is not elected by themselves. They had the idea that the state legislature would elect subservient to their own desires, not the people's. If the elected representatives are representing the people, then the people should choose who they want to be represented by. The Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the state legislature to elect representatives because they believed that “politicians should elect politicians.” The Federalists thought that the people may be tricked into voting against the common good because they were not politicians; this was pretty much their only argument. The Anti-Federalists had the most reasons and evidence as to why the people should elect their own representatives. To balance the power the people now had, being able to elect their own representatives, the Congress now elects the

Of course, the Federalists, who supported the Virginia Plan, wanted proportional representation while the Anti-Federalists, who supported the New Jersey Plan, wanted equal representation. The Federalists thought that an equal number of people should have an equal number of representatives while a different number of people should have a different number of representatives. They feared rule by minority. They also believed that no proper government could work on equal representation. The Anti-Federalists believed that if they were to have proportional representation that the small states would be “destroyed,” that the energy and stability of government would be in danger. Patterson said that it was “Striking at the existence of the lesser states”. In the end, proportional representation won because that was what everyone believed would be most fair to