ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

619 Words3 Pages

Did you know that the president doesn’t get to create anything that the Supreme Court doesn’t approve of? I am a Federalist. I am living in the 1700’s in the brand new United States of America. Federalist, like me, believe in different rights and different ways of life than an Anti-Federalist. A federalist is a person who supports the Constitution. The Federalists want a strong government and strong executive branch. The Anti-Federalist oppose the Constitution. They didn’t want to give up any of their state's’ power. The Articles of Confederation are a written document that establishes a function of the national government in the United States. The Constitution is saying that we people are guaranteed certain basic rights, have a national government and have fundamental laws. The federalist support the Constitution and not the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation had to be ratified by all 13 states. …show more content…

“Each State remains its sovereign, freedom, and independence and not expressly delegated to U.S.” (Articles of Confederation Worksheet, Author John Dickinson). This is a strength because the states now have rights. All the states have it, and it is not expressed to the U.S. in Congress. “The delegates annually appoint in manner as the legislature of each state will direct to meet with Congress in November, every year with the ability to recall its delegates anytime within the year”(Articles of Confederation Author John Dickinson). This is a weakness because, the bigger states base the electing off of wealth and population. So most of the delegates come from the bigger

Show More
Related
784 Words | 4 Pages

It is 1787, and the Framers of the Constitution have a daunting decision to make. The United States of America is a free nation, but a new system of government needs to be established. The first attempt has already failed; the Articles of Confederation has proven to be too weak to govern the nation and deal with its problems. This new government should be strong enough to rule over all the States while allowing each of the States to maintain sovereignty. Eventually, the Framers decide on a federal government, which divides power between the central government and regional governments.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

Article’s of Confederation Essay Article’s of Confederation Essay There are many problems with our government system. The Article’s of Confederation are poor, there are differences between governments; and the country does not have a constitution. What is happening to the United States of America right now? There are multiple problems with the Article’s of Confederation.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

When political leaders met in Philadelphia to figure out how they could strengthen the Articles of Confederation they soon realized that they needed to replace the entire thing with the US Constitution. Those that did not support the constitution were became known as the anti-federalist and those that supported it were known as the Federalists. The federalist wrote the Federalists Papers that were published in newspapers trying to gain support for the constitution. Two states, Massachusetts and South Carolina wrote up a resolution list to ratify the Constitution in order to get them to support it. Both states wanted “all Powers not expressly delegated by the aforesaid Constitution to be reserved to the several States to be by them exercised” (Avalon Project, 1788).

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

I am Jonathan Dayton, hailing from New Jersey, and I am a Federalist. I am here today at the Constitutional Convention to discuss the pros and cons of the our nation’s governing documents. I will be speaking in favor of a constitution rather than articles of confederation. Speaking as a Federalist, I see some flaws in the Articles of the Confederation. One feature of the Articles of Confederation is that the power of voting would be in the hands of the people.

Read More
1266 Words | 6 Pages

The Articles of Confederation guaranteed that the thirteen states kept its sovereignty, freedom, independence, power, and jurisdiction. But, the

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

As it applies to the Articles of Confederation there were many weaknesses in the way it went about governing the United States. For one, the loose federation of the states was too weak to act as a foundation to be considered or act as a central government. In addition the state legislatures had too much power and in turn had the ability to influence economic issues of all kinds. This strong legislature is the same one that allowed for mob ruling and actions by debtors. The Articles of confederation were also weak because the required congress to have all 13 colonies in agreement when a new tax was to be passed.

Read More
365 Words | 2 Pages

A perpetual, age old question: where does the power go? The debate of whether certain rights belong to the state or the federal government has been argued in America since its creation up to modern times. Out of necessity during the war, The Articles of Confederation were created, and shortly after that, The Constitution of the United States was written in light of the imperfections of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation originated the Federal versus states’ rights debate in America, giving the states large amounts of power, and congress almost none. The Constitution of the United States furthered the debate later on creating tensions between those who favored states’ rights and were against the ratification of the

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

 The federalists support the Constitution as presented by the convention delegates where as anti-federalists opposed the constitution and claimed that it gave the national government too much power, which erode states authority and endangered individual

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists favored an efficient government that could improve and protect their economic status. The Constitution promises a strong centralized government with a checks and balances system to even out

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists were known to support “loose construction” of the constitution which is defined by Oxford Dictionary as “A broad interpretation of a statute or document by a court.” Federalists believe that when making decisions in a court or when writing laws, they should be only based on the constitution rather than following the words of the constitution strictly. Due to the fact that the Constitution was signed in 1787, it would not be realistic years later to continue to completely and solely follow the constitution word by word because of our ever changing society and the Federalists realized this. I personally find that the Federalists were more realistic when choosing what to and not to

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

“Antifederalists” believe that there is no one to protect the rights of the people. Federalists, believe that the Constitution provides a perfect way to govern life in America. The constitution is a great document, and should ratified. The fundamental basic for government and law, is the concept of the social contract.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

These people are known as federalists and antifederalists. The federalists are the people that support the constitution. These people believe that the constitution is the best way for the country to prosper. It is the only way to make sure this country stays the way it is. On the other side of the argument are the anti-federalists.

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist’s belief to ratify the new proposed Constitution is the best position for our country because it would protect the safety and liberty of the citizens, and a new government needed to be established that had greater national-level powers. Before the new Constitution, states had their own governments, laws, and disciplinary tactics/actions. There was a national government, but it didn’t have nearly as much power or control over the states as it did after the Constitution was ratified. The Constitution gave the nation a sense of unity, because now all power was divided between the federal government and the many individual state governments. A strong central government was necessary if the states were going to band together to form

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

Open Document