ipl-logo

Process Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

430 Words2 Pages

The Ratification of the Constitution
The United States Constitution has been operative since 1789. Today, many question the relevancy of a document 222 years old to our society. The Founders created a government farmworker, guaranteed rights of people, and separated the powers. There was great controversy of whether the Constitution should be ratified. The “Federalists”, supporters of the Constitution, were up against a loosely organized group know as “Antifederalist.” “Antifederalists” believe that there is no one to protect the rights of the people. Federalists, believe that the Constitution provides a perfect way to govern life in America. The constitution is a great document, and should ratified. The fundamental basic for government and law, is the concept of the social contract. According to this, human beings live as individuals in a society, they must establish a contract whereby they agree …show more content…

Checks and balances ensure that limits are put on the government, and that rights will not be violated. The more of the people repersentented in government allows for more interest a more power given to people. Through separation of powers, three branches were created. The legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. The legislative branch makes the laws and provides for local interest. The executive branch enforces the laws, and provides for national interest. The last branch, the judicial branch interprets the laws and provides for the fundamental interest of America and its people. As Benjamin Franklin said, “For when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views.” When you bring these branches together, you have all parts of America

Show More
Related

Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

647 Words | 3 Pages

One of the ways that the United States guarded against cruel and oppressive government or rule was that they made the three branches of government. These three branches were the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. This helped guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because “they were separate and distinct powers.” (Doc B) This would help to guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because all of these powers were separated so there wasn’t one overpowering government.

Read More

Analysis Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

500 Words | 2 Pages

In document C, there is a very useful chart that shows one way that each of the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) holds a little bit of power over the others. This is good because it means that no one part of government is above or below the others in terms of power, and there is always a way for one of them to be “checked” if they are becoming too tyrannical. For example, the President (executive) can veto Congressional legislation, but Congress (legislative) can impeach the President if necessary. Being able to “check” each other is one of the ways that the Constitution kept one group from having too much power. Another benefit of having the checks and balances system is that none of the three branches is so far apart from each that they have no power over the others, but they are far enough apart to prevent the power from accumulating.

Read More

DBQ Essay: The United States Constitution

1159 Words | 5 Pages

DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal

Read More

Causes Of The 3/5 Compromise

570 Words | 3 Pages

The US Constitution was seen differently between two political parties. These two political parties were the Federalist and Anti-federalist. How much power the government had wasn't the same for these two groups. A Federalist was a group of people who supported the Constitution and the Anti-federalist was a group of people who opposed the ratification of the

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More

Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

882 Words | 4 Pages

The Executive branch executes laws and is the president. The Judicial branch judges laws and is the Supreme Court. The Legislative branch creates laws and is the House of Representatives and Senate. James Madison said in Federalist Paper #47 Document B, “the accumulation of all powers...in the same hands...may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This helps protect from tyranny because the Separation of Powers prevents all power from being in the same hands.

Read More

Checks And Balances On The Salem Witches Trial

1207 Words | 5 Pages

Braulio Escalera Professor Leon History 100 October 14, 2017 Midterm • Section 1: 50% of total grade 1. Identify and describe the importance of five (5) of the following terms: Salem Witches Trial: being a witch indicates that you have super natural or specific devil powers and you can use them against humans by hurting them in return of their soul or loyalty. The story of the Salem Trial witches began in the year 1692 after several young girls were accused for being witches in Salem village, Massachusetts. After the accusations some witches were hanged on June 1692. But the people that were accused of witchcraft were not only women, some of them were men too.

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More

Essay On How Does The Supreme Court Control Its Docket

2005 Words | 9 Pages

The idea of separation of powers is to have the government powers divided between numerous branches in order for abuse of power to be both less damaging, and less frequent. Checks and balances are a way to even further prevent abuse in our Government system. In this system of checks and balances each branch, those being the legislative, judicial, and executive branch, they each check and balance one another 's powers. Our government is designed this way so that one branch does not have too much power in their hands.

Read More

Essay On Ratifying The Constitution

457 Words | 2 Pages

Ratifying the Constitution Ratifying the Constitution has saved our country from being like England and from not falling apart. Before the constitution we had the articles and those weren’t working out at the time and we weren’t able to fight against rebellions and or against other countries when. We could act faster with the Constitution and we had a checks and balance system and also we had a checks and balances system. We could have acted faster with the constitution instead of wanting around for all states to agree on doing something.

Read More

Checks And Balances: The Differences Between The Executive Branch And Congress

967 Words | 4 Pages

When the United States gained their independence, the founders wanted the government to work successfully. As a result, the creators decided to separate the powers of Congress, the Executive, and the Courts and make them equally share power. The framers knew that although dividing the powers of these three branches would not be ideally, they decided to formalize the checks and balances. They originated a system of checks and balances to limit each branch of government from performing the functions and obligations of the other arms of government. In other words, the checks and balances help maintain each branch with limited power, it does not allow one branch to be more superior than the other.

Read More

Executive And Judicial Branch Analysis

498 Words | 2 Pages

Our United States government is composed of three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. These branches uphold checks and balances, as in each branch can check each other to keep the balance in power. For example, the Executive Branch can veto bills from the Legislative branch, and the Judicial branch can declare congress made laws unconstitutional. , The Legislative Branch can also check the Executive and Judicial Branches in many ways. These combined with other allowed checks keep the government balanced out and predominantly fair.

Read More

Us Constitution Relevant Today Essay

1561 Words | 7 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was formed 223 years ago. Since 1787, a lot has changed. We grew as a country, technology advanced, and we elected 43 different presidents. One of witch, being the first African-American President in history. Due to its age, some may argue that the Constitution is irrelevant to today’s problems.

Read More

How Did Federalist 51 Impact Today's Government

543 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, power has been justly distributed between each division of government. Checks and balances are yet another form of separation of powers in the government. As the Constitution was initially written, there were checks and balances preventing any one branch of becoming too powerful. Since we still follow the same Constitution (with a few amendments) those checks and balances are still used.

Read More

More about Process Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document