ipl-logo

Note On Speeches Debating The Consitution From The NY Ratification Convention

846 Words4 Pages

Jason Vo Professor Sanchez HIST&146 11 June 2023 Module 5 Essay: “Speeches Debating the Consitution from the NY Ratification Convention” The ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787 was an important event that started the conflict between the two factions, the Federalists and the Anti Federalists. This was one of the first significant walls the United States faced after they attained independence from the British government. The politicians of America had broken up into two major factions that were based on the views they had on the ratification of the Constitution. Both of the factions had hugely different ideals from one another with the Federalist's ideal that having a centralized government was important for the stability …show more content…

Overall, the British government was a tyrannical rule in which the ruling and decisions were all up to one person, King George III. Since the United States had previously already had to go through a terrifying event that was the British government, the Anti Federalists wanted to learn from their mistakes and avoid a government that would possess unmanageable power which would lead to corruption within the system and oppression for the people under the rule. Secondly, the Anti Federalists had also debated that there was a lacking of a Bill of Rights, which would protect the freedom of the people and make sure that the government would not overstep boundaries. With the current path that the Constitution was following the Anti Federalists feared the downfall of the United States, with all three of the branches of the new central government threatening all of the beliefs and ideals that the Anti Federalists had followed. Not only was there a lacking of power and representation for the people in the state there was also a lack of representation in the Central government for the people in order to speak out against the ratification of the constitution. Melancton Smith declared, “ The idea that naturally suggests itself to our minds, when we speak of representatives is, that they resemble those they represent; they should be a true picture of the people; possess the knowledge of their circumstances and their wants; sympathize in all their distresses, and be disposed to seek their true interests” (Smith, 123). This essentially is a jab at the idea of how scummy it was for the Federalists to attempt to rig the voting by having a lack of representation for the people in order to try to tip the tides in their favor. Ultimately, the Anti

Show More
Related
598 Words | 3 Pages

Answer: Massachusetts farmers opposed the Constitution in light of the fact that they felt it ensured exchange more than horticulture, the Federalist Papers were distributed there to pick up backing for it. Virginia and New York would not ratify until the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. In light of the opposition, John Hancock at the Massachusetts ratifying tradition suggested that a bill of rights be included as the first gathering of amendments to the Constitution. Ratification in Massachusetts and pretty much all whatever remains of the uncommitted states relied on upon the comprehension that receiving a bill of rights would be the new government's first request of business. There were the opposition which was made out of assorted

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

The authors claimed opposition “unnerves the aim of government” and “aids the enemy”, which is Great Britain in this case . By their statement that opposition in turn benefitted the British, the representatives called dissent as essentially against United States’ interests. The authors associate opposition as a threat to the union and thus, concludes opposition “will finally end in anarchy and rebellion” . The Democratic-Republican representatives cite European history as proof that opposition and division creates disunion, animosity and “distrust when confidence is required”. Additionally, they focus on Federalist opposition specifically and even state Federalists contradict themselves in a way that “Federalists called aloud for war and abused the government for not declaring it…but now...you are told the war is unjust” .

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

The book is a narrative that accounts the events of the convention and how the Constitution was drafted and created. The book emphasizes the process and thought behind all the compromises created for the Constitution to be ratified by all the delegates. Furthermore, the book outlines the four months it took to craft the Constitution and the intensity of the delegates at the convention. The Summer of 1787 also mentions almost all the delegates in extreme depth, such as Roger Sherman, Benjamin Franklin, John Dickenson, George Washington and other eminent politicians and lawyers. The book discloses what each delegate did at the convention, what their opinions were and what their beliefs

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

The ratification of the constitution occurred between 1787-1789. Just prior to this, the colonists had defeated the French and Indians in the Seven Years War (a.k.a. French and Indian War), and immediately following the victory the British ended their salutary neglect towards the colonies and began to tax the the colonists in order to pay for the war. These events sparked a chain reaction that saw the colonists declare independence and defeat the British in the Revolution. This brings us to the constitutional convention whose task was to design a government for the people, by the people.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

The Shay’s Rebellion, as well as economic depression in the United States, opened doors for protests and questions regarding the effectiveness of the Articles of Confederation. The question of whether a powerful central government was necessary to provide citizens fundamental rights caused deliberation among officials. After years of debate, the Articles of Confederation was overturned, resulting in the establishment of the United States Constitution. The Constitution, perceived as a supreme document, served as a solution to the defects of the Confederation. In 1787, the same year the Constitution was ratified, an essay was written, presumably by Robert Yates.

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

Madison states that the “The two great points of difference, between a democracy and a republic, are, first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended” (Madison, 154). Madison throughout the Federalist 10 papers mentions that he prefers a republic, where this is less representation. Warren believed that the representation proposed by the Constitution was insufficient. She mentions this in her eleventh reason, stating that “one representative to thirty thousand inhabitants is a very inadequate representation...interfering with any regulations for the time, places, and manner of choosing our own representatives” (Warren, 158). Because Mercy Warren preferred a stronger state government, she doesn’t feel as though the representation would represent well enough what they need and would give them less liberty to choose their

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

Disagreements about the appropriate framework for government were predominantly featured between the Federalists and the Anti-federalists. The Federalists proposed that America needed a constitution that promoted a stronger central government that also gave powers to the subnational governments of the states. According to them, this would create a more unified nation that would facilitate law and order. Conversely, the Anti-Federalists opposed the idea of having a stronger central government due to the perpetual fear that a central government could potentially expand its power and eventually take all the powers from the states. They wanted to avoid this kind of government as much as possible, as it reminded them of their experiences under the unitary British

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

That’s a huge difference between these two parties except they both created systems in order to ensure the government couldn’t possess too much power. The federalists created checks and balances which split the powers of the government equally therefore no one party had too much overbearing powers. Federalists created this to ensure the government couldn’t become tyrannous. On the other hand the Anti-Federalists fought for a bill of rights therefore ensuring their rights couldn’t be robbed by a tyrannous government. Both sides were scared to trust a government after the strict British rule while one was more willing to make a new government than the other.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Q2 Challenges Addressed at the Constitutional Convention The Constitutional Convention of 1787 sought to address several pressing challenges facing the newly formed United States, including the weakness of the central government and the conflicts over representation in the legislature. The Constitution, as ratified in 1788 and amended through the Bill of Rights in 1791, addressed many of these issues, though some would persist and evolve during the early decades of the nation's history. Two major challenges addressed at the Convention included the balance of power between the central government and the states, and the nature of representation in the legislature. It can be argued that while the Constitution made significant strides in addressing

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

Federalist 39, also outlines that this new form of government receive its power to govern from the people and for them to recognize that fact, so the populous recognizes that the government is not an aristocracy. Madison when talking about representation explains that

Read More
247 Words | 1 Pages

Assembling in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention were focused on ending the era of economic depression, social uncertainty, and leadership under an unhealthy central government that had followed independence (McKay, Crowston, Wiesner-Hanks, & Perry, 2017). Members permitted to discuss their differences without any consequences or retaliation while in attendance of the Constitutional Convention. These delegates were elected due to them being members of the social and educational elite, they were also young, wealthy, and desired to make the national government strong, while promoting economic and social stability (Schultz, 2013). The two main divisions at the Constitutional Convention were the large

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist and Republican Parties surfaced during George Washington’s term as President of the United States. During Washington’s term, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson’s opposing views helped with the creation of these parties. Both had the best intentions for the newly founded United States, but their thinking went in different directions. The disagreements centered on the amount of control the national government had and the capabilities of the American people to govern themselves. The Federalist Party believed there should be a strong central government at the expense of the states’ rights, the government should be run by wealthy, highly-educated people encouraging manufacturing and trade, and the Constitution should be used as a guide and interpreted loosely.

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Bringing it back to the conventions tied to Shay's rebellion, some were afraid to give people the power to elect their officials for representation. Hammering this point down is an article from 1849 on the Constitutional Convention: “all officers shall be elected by the people”. The day

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

The controversies over the ratification of the Constitution was taxation, too much power to the President, trading, and the lack of Bill of Rights. There were people who agreed to ratify the Constitution the way it is, which were called federalists. Federalists reasoned that Americans should ratify the Constitution because Americans are allowed to ask for additional amendments after they ratify the Constitution. The ability to be able to request additional amendments after supported the Federalist’s point of view because the Anti-federalists may ask for further amendments after which could happen after they ratify the Constitution.

Read More

More about Note On Speeches Debating The Consitution From The NY Ratification Convention

Open Document