ipl-logo

Difference Between Trial Court And Appellate Court

1148 Words5 Pages

Assignment #1
Question 1: What is judicial review? How and when was the power of judicial review established?

a) Judicial review is the function of the judicial branch of the government that gives them the power to review and interpret the laws and decide whether the actions taken by the other two branches, executive and legislative, are in accordance with the law.

Similarly speaking, while the legislative branch (congress) makes the laws and the executive branch (president and its administration) enforces the laws, the judicial branch (supreme court) gets to review, scrutinized, and determine that any actions taken by the other branches is legal under the constitution. Otherwise, it will be deemed not enforceable.

In recent time, Supreme Court did a judicial review of the Affordable …show more content…

The trial court is where the case is first heard before the judge and the jury. It is where each opposing party to the case gets to present evidence through witnesses, records, and other documentations supporting their claim. As such, the focus of the trial court is on facts presented and the governing law or laws that applies to the case upon which decisions are made to settle the dispute.
In contrast, the appellate court is the next step up to the trial court. If either of the party to the lawsuit is not happy with the outcome at the trial court level, they can appeal the decision to the appellate court, where all evidence and testimonies submitted during the trial are reviewed (by judges, no juries) as well as the applicable rules and laws used as basis for determination or the trial court’s decision. Thus, unlike the trial court, the focus of the appellate court is to review for errors and ensure that the trial court applied the laws fairly and correctly.
Question 4: a) What is discovery, and b) how does electronic discovery differ from

Show More
Related
1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

The judicial review strengthens the constitutional principle of checks and balances. In the 1789 judiciary act and Judiciary act of 1801 had the right to allow the writs of mandamus. Meaning that they court should have power and including the fact that they are forced to do something. John Marshall weakened the power of the supreme court by getting rid of the power. However he did improve the branch by creating the judicial review.

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

2. Explain how judicial review shaped the role of the federal courts. Judicial review is principle under the legislative and executive branch that are subject to review the judicial sayings. Federal Courts used judicial review, to override hundreds of laws that conflict with the United States Constitution. 3.

Read More
150 Words | 1 Pages

Specialty courts are formed in order to staff them with people who have a great deal of knowledge on whatever special type of cases that court handles. For instance: Juvenile courts handle only cases that involve the proper punishment and rehabilitation of youthful offenders. Probate courts handle disagreements among heirs concerning the dispersal of estates of deceased persons.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Accordingly, Judicial Review was born, it is the power of the courts to review laws, treaties, policies or executive orders relevant to cases before the court and overturn those that are found unconstitutional. However, some people thought the judicial review gives the Judicial branch unlimited power to do things that against the citizens since they are the las process of making laws, other court cannot overrule them. Also they have a whole life term being judge made them so independent from other branches. Due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role to make sure that each branch of government check and balance the limits of its own power. Also, Judicial review also protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

In response to arraignment, the accused is expected to enter a plea. In the Lindberg Baby Case, throughout the arraignment the defendant was charged with kidnapping and murder. Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation, including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved. In the last part of the adjudication process, the judge agrees on the ratio decidendi which is the ground or reason for a decision.

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

Under the Articles, if the first court found the accused guilty they were designated as guilty. The new Judicial branch made it so that the accused could appeal the court and receive a new hearing as many times as they would like. However, one the case got to the Supreme Court, whatever their ruling was is the final decision. This gave the people the right to a fair trial. That way, if they were innocent but deemed guilty, they could appeal and have the chance to be found innocent.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The judicial branch is the branch of government that interprets and applies laws to the states and includes the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, Adams Judicial Appointments, and the Marbury v. Madison final decision all supported

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

With this power, the judiciary has the ability to "check" the actions of their fellow branches, the executive and legislative branches. Judicial review was interpreted from the judges' understanding of the Constitution. This power impacts American citizens profoundly. Now, the courts have the right to overturn laws when they are presented in court. For example, in the case

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

This ability is a check and balance on the separation of powers. The courts with judicial review power is allowed to invalidate laws and decisions that may be incompatible with the higher authority or in this case a written constitution. Judicial review can be looked at two different ways separated by civil and common law they present different ideas on judicial review. Common law judges are capable of creating new legal principles and they can also reject invalid legal principles. In civil law the judges are those that will apply the law and they do not have the power to create nor destroy legal principles.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

Government, Constitution, and other federal laws (Court Role and Structure., n.d.). There are multiple different courts within the federal court system. There are 94 Federal District Court’s with the U.S. that serve as the primary trial courts within the federal system (Court Role and Structure., n.d.). There are other courts that hear different issues such as the Bankruptcy Courts and Article I Courts (Court Role and Structure., n.d.). Article I courts include U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and U.S. Tax Court (Court Role and Structure., n.d.).

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

She is Marnelli Bautista, a good friend since 2007. She grew up in Saudi Arabia, the reason for having good command of the English language. Pair it up with random thoughts… That was how she came up with her songs. Which I think is pretty amazing.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

The three levels within the federal courts are: the U.S. Magistrate Courts, the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The magistrate courts are the lowest level and as such are limited to trying misdemeanors, setting bail amounts and assisting the district courts. The U.S. District Courts are the federal branch of original jurisdiction courts. These are responsible for criminal trials and giving guilty or not guilty verdicts. The U.S. Courts of Appeals are responsible for all the appeals from U.S. district courts.

Read More

More about Difference Between Trial Court And Appellate Court

Related Topics

Open Document