ipl-logo

Discrimination Used By Reginald Rose: Confronting Bias In Twelve Angry Men

596 Words3 Pages

Title: Discrimination Unveiled: Confronting Bias in "Twelve Angry Men"

Introduction:
Reginald Rose's play "Twelve Angry Men" offers a thought-provoking exploration of discrimination and its corrosive effects on the pursuit of justice. Set within the confines of a jury room, the play presents a riveting examination of twelve jurors grappling with their biases as they deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murder. Through poignant dialogue and powerful quotes, Rose unveils the prevalence of discrimination in society and underscores the importance of confronting these biases. This essay will analyze the instances of discrimination portrayed in the play, shedding light on the destructive consequences of prejudice and the transformative potential of empathy and critical thinking.

Juror #10: Perpetuating Racial Stereotypes:
Juror #10 exemplifies the embodiment of discrimination rooted in racial stereotypes. His prejudiced beliefs are revealed through offensive remarks and derogatory language, exposing deep-seated racism and bigotry. When he dismissively labels the defendant as "one of them," he perpetuates negative stereotypes and undermines the objectivity of the jury. Juror #10's discriminatory mindset is evident in his assertion: "You know how 'these people' lie. It's born in them." This …show more content…

His strained relationship with his own son influences his judgment, causing him to project his unresolved emotions onto the defendant. This is evident when he declares, "The kid's a liar. I know it. I know all about them. They're born liars." Juror #3's inability to separate his personal grievances from the case blinds him to the possibility of reasonable doubt and obstructs his capacity to consider alternative viewpoints. It is through intense conflict and introspection that Juror #3 ultimately confronts his prejudice and reevaluates his

Show More
Related
466 Words | 2 Pages

Block 4 Prejudice is a big problem in today’s juries, as it can put an innocent person in jail, or worse. Twelve angry men by Reginald Rose is a great example of what can happen if jurors' minds are poisoned by prejudice and bias. The book is centered around Juror 8 who has the big job of showing a prejudiced jury that a kid who was alleged to have committed premeditated homicide was innocent. Reginald Rose uses the 3rd juror to develop the ideas of prejudice on juries by showing how personal experience can help feed into prejudice heavily, and how.

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” portrayed the theme of prejudice though several of the jurors base their opinions of the case on racist feelings toward the 16 year old boy. This is shown by; “The 4th Juror coldly states that people from slums are more likely to be violent, which offends the 5th Juror, who grew up in a slum. The 10th Juror makes racist statements throughout, and as the deliberation goes on” (Sparknotes) This is relevant to the

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Juror eight believes that the kid is innocent but the rest do not agree. He has to try to convince the others while they keep putting him down and telling him that it's obvious that the kid is guilty. Juror ten says, “Look, we’re all grown-ups here. We heard the facts, didn’t we?

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

(page 13). Instead of going in depth into whether the defendant is guilty or not, juror 7 states his own opinion, not openly caring about others. While juror 7 is putting almost no effort into the case, many of the other jurors are biased against the

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

In Reginald Rose's book "12 Angry Men," the author highlights how prejudice can lead to unfair trials. Rose's play revolves around a murder case in which twelve jurors must decide whether or not the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Throughout the play, Rose presents various arguments and evidence to support his claim that prejudice influences the decision-making process in trials, leading to unfair outcomes. In this essay, I will provide three pieces of evidence from the play to support this claim.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, we can see that prejudice gets in the way of truth. Many of the jurors that participated have let prejudice get in their way to see the truth and look at the real situation and facts, for example, Juror Three, who “is a very strong, very forceful, extremely opinionated man within whom can be detected a streak of sadism… is intolerant of opinions other than his own, and accustomed to forcing his wishes upon others.” He has a son that he identifies as a “tough guy”, which is one of the descriptions of the 19-year-old accused, Juror Three let the image of his own son be reflected on the boy and made him think unfairly. Getting to the bottom of a complex issue takes time and effort. At the beginning of the play, most jury members wanted to get over the case and go home as early as they could, but one of the jury members, Juror Eight, who was sure the boy was not guilty, took many hours to question the evidence and the case and murder itself, but he was not the only one as other jury members also spoke about what they thought in the past options, fairly quick, it was almost six in the evening and Juror Six wanted to leave to go to his family, it may have been more of an excuse to leave, but the jurors did not let him leave because they had gone far enough to decide where the trial was going

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt. When the first ballot is taken, 10 of his fellow jurors agree that defendant is guilty while there is only one Juror had different view that defendant is innocent. Juror No. 10 begins a racist rant. As he continues, one juror

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Maybe it serves 'em right." Juror 12 holds the opinion that an individual's childhood affects whether or not they develop criminal behaviours. However, regardless of the environment they were raised in, anyone could become a criminal. Juror 4's statement that "...the children who come out of slums are potential menaces to society," is another example of this. Here, he displays that he has a negative opinion of kids from underprivileged backgrounds.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

This process continues throughout the course of the movie, and each juror’s biases is slowly revealed. Earlier through the movie, it is already justifiable to label juror 10 as a bigoted racist as he reveals strong racist tendencies against the defendant, stating his only reason for voting guilty is the boy’s ethnicity and background. . Another interesting aspect of this 1957 film is the “reverse prejudice” portrayed by juror

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

In "twelve angry men," we can see how prejudice has its own way with the cloak of justice. Personal prejudice is most strongly evident in the characters of Juror #3 and Juror #10. At the beginning of story, Juror #3 immediately claimed that the case was simple and the defendant’s guilt was obvious. Although he was not a new juror and ought to be experienced

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Thesis: The events depicted in "12 Angry Men" serve as a reminder of the importance of impartiality, critical thinking, and the pursuit of truth in the justice system. To begin, let us consider the concept of impartiality. As jurors, we are called upon to set aside our personal prejudices and preconceptions and make a decision based solely on the evidence presented in court. The character of Juror 8 in "12 Angry Men" embodies this ideal, as he takes a stand against the majority of the jurors and advocates for a fair examination of the facts. It is imperative that we, as citizens, follow in his footsteps and strive for impartiality in our own lives and in the justice system.

Read More
1346 Words | 6 Pages

Juror 3 has his heart set that the boy is guilty, only because his own son left him years ago. In the movie he explains, I 've got a kid. When he was eight years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed, I told him right out, ‘I 'm gonna make a man out of you or I 'm gonna bust you up into little pieces trying.’

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Juror Ten announces his intentions very early in the play. He speaks loudly and forcefully from the beginning, clearly showing his racism and prejudice towards the boy. Juror 10 quickly votes guilty and asserts that the defendant cannot be believed because “they’re born liars”. Additionally, he claims that the “kids who crawl outa those places are real trash.”

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

His prejudice is clear when he says that “I’ve lived among ‘em all my life. You can’t believe a word they say” when speaking about the boy (16). Juror Ten’s prejudice causes him to disregard all of the facts that are presented to him by Juror Eight that can prove that the accused is not guilty. Juror 10 allows his prejudice to blind him of the truth. That is until he is called out by his fellow jurors.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

He thinks that the boy isn’t guilty just because he isn’t

Read More

More about Discrimination Used By Reginald Rose: Confronting Bias In Twelve Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document