I have chosen to compare Michigan?s judicial system with ours for this assignment. Missouri?s judicial system consists of three levels, the Circuit Court (trial court) which is the lowest level of the system, then the intermediate appellate courts which is known as the Court of Appeals and then the highest level of our judicial system, the Missouri Supreme Court, or the ?court of last resort.? Missouri?s Circuit Court contains 45 circuits with courts in each county that includes 134 circuit judges, 175 Associate Circuit Judges and 336 Municipal judges. The Circuit Courts include divisions, such as probate, juvenile, municipal, associate, family and circuit divisions.
The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.
Federalists believed the Constitution provided just the right mix of power and limitations. The federalists wanted to make sure the central government either had more or less power. The first government of the US was a one-house legislature with no executive. It couldn't raise money, it relied on the states for military power, and was generally seen as ineffective and weak. The US Constitution was written to remedy those weaknesses and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government.
The conditions in which the Supreme Court hears a case is on an appeal basis. What is the structure of a typical state court system?
The United States government, a simple yet advanced system with the goal of keeping the people safe, healthy, and wealthy. It’s a three branch system that equally divides the powers to create, enforce, and interpret laws. The branch with the power to interpret and/or override these laws from action is the Judicial branch. This branch has the power to deem laws unconstitutional. The Judicial branch also has the highest power in the court with it as the Supreme Court.
The government of the United States of America had its infrastructure set in stone in the span of the year 1787 (National Constitution Center, n.d.) when this country’s founding fathers put their futures into their own hands and laid down various ground rules for the government to follow by constructing the United States Constitution. Among the words written in the U.S. Constitution, Articles I, II, and III records the given powers of the United States Congress, President, and the three branches of the national government, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. These rules give many abilities to these parts of the government, but there are also restrictions given to them as well. Through the United States Constitution, the Congress is given
I disagree that U.S courts should follow a "hands-off" approach because inmates would have the most disadvantages. Correctional administrators and correctional officers have a common ground and would most likely to stick up to each other if an inmate gets into the bad side of officers and disciplining them inappriopriate ways such as the incident involving the nutraloaf. U.S courts could come up in way that is fair for the inmates and according to their offenses. In the context, the “deliberate indifference” would mean that the prison officials did not violated the Eighth Amendment rights and, therefore, did not put an inmate in harm by wthe continuous serving of nutraloafs. In my definition, deliberate indifference would favor an inmate's
That so interesting to hear and I think that since our founding of the nation, the Constitution can be referred to ask the "bible" of this country. The Founding Fathers worked so hard to be independent and create a nation that was different, but one that could work for many centuries. After two centuries and five decades it has seemed to work and it would be very hard to change something that so many of us are used, too. There are times when it may seem that our system is failing, much of the public doesn't blame the system when things go wrong, we tend to blame those who are in office or Congress. What makes our governmental system so different and unique is that people are more willing to go vote for the president and want their voice to
According to a poll conducted by Gallup, in just the past two decades, the percentage of people who approve of the way the Supreme Court conducts its job has declined from 62% to 40% (Supreme Court). The percentage of people who disapprove has increased from 29% to 58%. It is clear that many Americans today do not approve of the Supreme Court and its Justices. The changes in these percentages can be attributed to the widespread concern that Justices are not impartial. However, it is a fact that bias is within all of us, and we can not only blame the Justices.
The Texas and federal court systems are integral components of the American legal system, but they share both similarities and differences that distinguish them from one another. In this essay, I will discuss two similarities and two differences between these two court systems, examining their structures, method of selection, and types of cases heard. Firstly, the hierarchical structure is a fundamental similarity shared by both the Texas and federal court systems. Both systems employ a similar hierarchical structure that commences with trial courts and progresses through intermediate appellate courts to the highest court at the top.
Lyndon B. Johnson presidency began rapidly; he took no time to establish himself. He dedicated his presidency to the civil rights and social reforms. He started off with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which he had to push through Congress for. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 became a law on July 2. The law secured equal rights for all Americans, to end segregation of public places, and ban discrimination based on sex, race, or national origin.
Going up from there are the circuit courts, the district courts of appeal, and the supreme court. There are 67 county courts, one in each county. These courts are of limited jurisdiction and deal with only minor offenses. The circuit courts are the states courts of original jurisdiction and are courts of record. They also hear appeals from the county courts.
There are many advantages and disadvantages to electing judges. There are more disadvantages to electing judges then there are advantages. The few advantages are; the people get to choose the judge they feel will make the best decisions and everyone likes to be a part of democracy and judging running for election may spend more time in the community learning about the population. A judge should be a non-partisan individual who ensures that laws are upheld and fair evidence-based decisions are made. Having a judge campaign for reelection seems counterproductive, the judge could be put into a situation where they have to rule on a campaign supporter and how they would be able to make a non-biased ruling.
Specialized Courts Specialized courts are commonly known as the problem-solving courts that promote positive reinforcement, support behavior modification, decrease victimization, and reduce recidivism. Examples of specialized courts include drug court and mental health courts. A community might benefit from establishing a specialized court such as a drug court because it follows a comprehensive model that concentrates on reducing criminal actions through treatment and rehabilitation services with the focus being on substance abuse addiction and identifying the cause without jeopardizing public safety and due process (Specialized Courts, 2013).
Out of the three the courts are the most harmful to the criminal justice systems. Once the police have done their investigations and arrested all offenders involved it will be up to the court to decide whether the person is guilty or not. This is where the problem comes in. Many people have been judged wrongly in the courts.
