Division Of Labor: Difference Between Sacred And Secular Societies

Division of labor between sacred and secular In early 1500s, a sign of division of labor between sacred and secular institutions raised as gradually uniting of sacred realm and Europe becoming apparent. A division of labor and sacred creates a difference, and that difference generates a basic institutional division of sacred and secular. A division of labor increases the possibility of divorce and conflicting regulatory claims, and this is becoming true for secular societies where extremely religious societies. Regulatory claim such as family law can be controversial because religious institutions may take responsible for regulating the family in secular matter, and religions should not be engaged in this and law, legal issues concerning family

Religious politics or sometimes called application of religious values, often have a case to vote. For example, there are two different voters facing two different issues and times, specifically tax issue. There is a group of people who favors the low taxation, on the other hand, another group of people who oppose them, could be free people, non-religious people. Depending on the situation and the nature of the issue there, voter is going to vote quite differently. This is very important about religious politic that when religious people face the high intensity issues, they are going to act differently, and if they face low intensity, nothing particular movement or turmoil will occur, regardless of their faith. Decision of the vote from two different groups are heavily depend on religious belief because religious belief will define what high intensity of issue from stand point at that faith and what low intensity of issue from stand at that faith. Low intensity issue indicates low significant faith, high intensity issue indicates high significant faith. Therefore, religious belief does affect the political issues in

What it means is that deficiency of competitive incentives for innovation and adaptation. There were no reasons to be competitive when they have a guaranteed income, a member of state clergy, legal monopoly over many aspects of public life, and controlling what toleration will be. That was important to understand, because religions and politics began to disappear. Most of people in France claims themselves as catholic, but rarely attend to church since participation or having a membership is not mandatory. If a church is identified as a state church, and if government gets denounced, them both church and government get condemned as showing chain reaction. As professor Magagna stated on 26th January 2015 about left-right polarization of European, their political stance have to follow their movement since they are subordinate to the state and depend on their resources. Their permeant position will not harm themselves, but destroy the flexibility. The advantages of centralization must be weighed against the cost for the division of