More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy of special education
Topics in special education law
Educational philosophy for special education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
[Title Here, up to 12 Words, on One to Two Lines] The case, Florence County School District IV v. Shannon Carter, is about a student who is entering the 9th grade and diagnosed with ADHD (attention deficit hyperactive disorder) and Dyslexia. Prior to entering high school Shannon Carter did not have an IEP or a 504 plan. Her parents began the process in high school to help their daughter learn to read, at this time Shannon was diagnosed as she was functionally illiterate. Shannon’s family was upset that the school was doing more to help their daughter be able to perform on grade level. Shannon’s parents began a due process because they felt that the school was not doing enough to assure she was reading on grade level by graduation.
This case between Ronald G. Sandison and Craig M. Stanley, verse Michigan High School Athletic Association centers around two high school students who believe they are being discriminated against because of their learning disability. Ronald Sandison and Craig Stanley both suffered from learning disabilities and were therefore two grades behind other students their age. Both of these students were placed in a special learning school, but by the time high school came around, they were in normal classes with everyone else. Stanley attended Grosse Pointe North High school and Sandison attended Rochester Adams High School. Sandison and Stanley both ran track and field their first three years of high school but were not allowed to run their senior year due to turning 19 before September 1st, 1994.
The district argued that the expenditures of supplying offerings in the study room would be too excessive. The district argued that the expenditures of supplying offerings in the study room would be too excessive. Number three of The Basic Special Education Process under IDEA 2004 says a group of qualified professionals and the parents look at the child’s evaluation results. Together, they decide if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA.
(2000 ed. and Supp. IV). His parents, Jeff and Sandee Winkleman, worked together with the school system to develop and write and individualized education plan (IEP). They could not reach an agreement on the IEP and therefore requested a due process hearing per §1415(f)(1)(A) (2000 ed., Supp. IV).
Anyone should be able to make a complaint to the Department. For issues concerning the differing opinions among school districts, private schools, parents, and state agencies, the Bureau of Special Education Appeals should hold hearings to resolve any problems. A parent or school district may request a hearing at anytime concerning the special education of their child or student. Never can a school
In a similar fashion, the comments made by the principal of the board in the Ferris v. Special School District No. 1 (1973) were also found by the court to be insufficient enough to affect Ferris’ future employment opportunities. The court decided that since Brouillete was nontenured, he was not entitled to protection of procedural due process guaranteed by the Constitution. The board in this case, as well as the district in Ferris’ case, were not at fault and did not infringe upon the rights of the
Garrett F. (1999): The student who is paralyzed from the neck down is an intelligent young man whose mental capacity had been unaffected from a motorcycle accident, but needed physical care during school hours. The family requested that the school accept financial responsibilities they have health services provided for him while he was at school the district refuse. Relying on idea and Iowa law Garrett's mother requested administrative law judge hear the case. The administrative law judge determined that IDEA required the district to bare the financial responsibilities for the services or needed throughout the day for the student. The district challenged this decision and the case was brought to the federal district court.
From the website, Encyclopedia Britannica article Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, I found that the court case Board of Education vs. Rowley is about a deaf student named Amy Rowley who lived in New York and attended a public school. Her parents approached the administration in the school at the beginning of Rowley kindergarten year explaining that their daughter would need an aid to sign to her while the teacher was teaching. The school granted their request for a two-week period but determined that the interpreter was not necessary. A new IEP was written for her explaining that she would use hearing aids and her ability to read lips to learn in a regular classroom. In addition, she would have
Facts: In Moore v. British Columbia (2012), Jeffrey is a student suffered from severe dyslexia, which is a learning disabilities defined in difficulties in reading but it does not affect general inelegance. He was denied remedial help at the school but referred to a Diagnostic Centre, which was later closed due to financial issues. Jeffrey’s father transferred him to a private school and filed a complaint against the Province and the school district stating that his son was not allow to have an access to a service entitled to him under s.8 of the B.C. Human Rights Code. As such, the Province and District were found to have discriminated the student by the Tribunal. However, the Supreme Court of British Columbia overturned the decision of
In the review of the corporate level strategy, we can see many different competitive advantages branching from their use of corporate diversification and vertical integration. Going deeper into those strategies the three elements that allow for a competitive advantage for The Kroger Co. include operating into different markets, having a successful customer reward program, and by having many different locations nationwide under many different brand names. The VRIO analysis found that all three of these give Kroger’s a sustainable competitive advantage by being valuable, rare, costly to imitate and having the right organization structure business wide. In the review of the business level strategy, there were just as many different competitive
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed (Imber, p. 316, 1993). Justice William H. Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the court, in a 6-3 decision, reversing the lower court decisions. The Supreme Court held that the Act does not require a school to provide a sign language interpreter to a deaf student when she is otherwise receiving personalized instruction and an adequate education. School administrations are allowed to determine what is required to meet students’ individual needs with a disability. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote a special concurrence, expressing that no interpreter was required because Amy was given the opportunity to learn and participate in the classroom in a way that was substantially equal to her non-handicapped classmates.
1. In the broader context (not specific to Dollar General), what is KKR’s investment strategy? What are the challenges KKR will encounter to make its investment in Dollar General successful? How could KKR add value to Dollar General?
The article that I have chosen to review is entitled Equality in Education and a School Board’s Duty of Accommodation: Can Segregation be accommodation? This article looks a legal case that took place in 1997, where the parents of a special needs child had a disagreement with how the school board decided to handle the accommodations for their child. The child’s name was Emily Eaton. Emily had cerebral palsy and was unable to communicate effectively. The school had provided her with an educational assistant, but they felt that the accommodation was not working.
Since the lack of alignment between standard and alternate exams, students with disabilities are expected to meet the same standard as the standard student. Yet, this creates a serious consequence for student with disability. In “High-States Testing and Student With Disabilities,” Antonis Katsiyannis suggests, “By allegedly failing to take into account the needs of students with disabilities, the defendants had created a test that left more than 500 students with disabilities statewide with possible denial of a diploma in the spring of 2004” (198). Student with disabilities and the other disadvantage subgroups are the only few that are not making AYP. For student with disabilities, they come across the most challenging academic obstacles.
Kids with learning disabilities need to have a fair chance at grade promotion. Now, imagine your child walking down the halls of her school with confidence, not having to stress about her standardized test. That is a world we want to live
