Does It Make No Sense When Considering Real Physics Of Newton's Second Law Of Motion

In the two man scene, what does it make no sense when considering real physics was, there seem to be zero momentum or opposite reaction occurs on the person from firing the very powerful gun, and the unrealistic force that appear to knocks the person backward. To apply the scene using one of law of physic, using Newton’s third law of motion, the force (momentum) that is making the person flying backward, means the same force (recoil) should also act on the person who fired the gun and making him moving the opposite direction. However, if the bullet had such unrealistic momentum that is able to force the person who got hit by the bullet, flying backward, the bullet is more likely to pass through the person and keep on going, because the bullet

If we look at Newton’s third law of motion, the force that is being applied to the tank should equal to the force that the tank is applying to the superhero, because the tank has a much greater mass compare to the mass of the superhero, the superhero must be accelerated much greater force than the tank. Using the formula of the force, in order to change the motion of an object, the greater the amount of force need to applied to accelerate the object (F = M × A). I think in a more realistic scene the superhero should have massive mass, like Hulk, not your average human, like Batman, Bruce Wayne. And Hulk needs to apply much more force on the tank, in order to change its velocity and be able to “throw” the tank to the enemies. Another more realistic scenario would be using some sort of equipment, maybe a lever, and have Hulk to jump on or pushing the lever downward using as much force he is able to generate, with the help of the lever, which can reduce the force to lift the tank, the superhero is able to lift the tank upward. However, the superhero still have to apply much more force in order to lift the tank upward in the