Dollar Tree Prospector

349 Words2 Pages

According to Parnell, “Miles and Snow consider for strategic types: (1) prospectors, (2) defenders, (3) analyzers, and (4) reactors” (2014, pg. 196). Therefore, I believe the analysis for the Dollar Tree prospectors is instability. The reason why is because the Dollar Tree is constantly producing innovations, whereas their defenders aren’t. For instance, most of their defenders are seeking stability in order to control their operations, so they can achieve the highest efficiency (Parnell, 2014). Therefore, if an alignment is reached between organizational structure, then the strategy among prospectors, defenders, and analyzers will give Dollar Tree the possibility to become a strong competitor in the industry. However, if a non-alignment is reached between both strategy and structure, then the effect could cause the Dollar Tree to reveal itself as a reactor strategy, which is known for being an ineffective competitor among the industry (Parnell, 2014). …show more content…

Wal-Mart is known as the largest retailer in the world. As a matter of fact, Wal-Mart is successful because of their everyday low prices (Reuters, 2016) According to Reuters, Wal-Mart operates in three segments (2016). The first segment is Wal-Mart U.S., which has “six strategic merchandise units across several store formats, including supercenters, neighborhood markets, discount stores, Walmart.com, and other small store formats” (2016, para. 2). Next, is Wal-Mart International, which has “various formats, such as hypermarkets, supercenters, cash and carry, digital retail, and etc.” (Reuters, 2016, para. 3). Then, there’s the last segment known as Sam’s Club, which “segment operates membership-only warehouse clubs, as well as samsclub.com” (Reuters, 2016, para.