ipl-logo

Donald Dripps Model On The Contingent Suppression Order

475 Words2 Pages

Donald Dripps model on The Contingent Suppression Order creating a “hybrid model” which combined the exclusionary rule and damages would only work in the real world if there was an accurate compensatory model that would be appropriate to each charge. According to Dripps model, “The judge is offering to rescind one, purely deterrent, remedy if and only if the government submits to another remedy that deters equally and compensates better. I can see absolutely no plausible argument that such a contingent suppression order exceeds the judge’s authority relative to the government.” (Dripp, 2001, pg. 23) Dripps supports his model by pointing out the areas in which a judge could vindicate the constitution without freeing the guilty. Therefore, Dripp proposal makes it clear that the …show more content…

Dripp states that, “a billion dollars per violation would always opt for exclusion and at one dollar per violation the government would always opt for the damages.” (Dripp, 2001, pg. 25) The only way the Contingent Suppression Order could work is if the price was first figured out. A way to test this theory would be to establish the Contingent Suppression Order in small claims courts within different district regions. If the order proved to be successful, then policy makers could implement the same policies in higher levels such as state and federal courts. Ultimately, the order supports a compensation retributive model in America’s court system. A similar spiritual comparison is stated in one of the most popular verses in the Christian faith. In John 3:16 it says, “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life.” Due to our sinful nature, it was required for God to send his one and only son as a compensatory to relinquish us from our sin. The same method of requiring a compensation for the damage applies in Dripp’s

Show More
Related
860 Words | 4 Pages

Apprendi vs. New Jersey Apprendi vs. New Jersey landmarked United States Supreme Court decisions dealing with provoking factors in crimes. Furthermore, it was found that judges were prohibited to sentence beyond the maximum amount because of factors other than the ones found by the jury. Beyond a reasonable doubt was the key word in this case. This case decision has been the precedent for the rights of people in jury trials. This case set the tone for other trials where an increased prison term was questionable.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

Anthony Lewis’ narrative in Gideon’s Trumpet has served as one of the most important law related occurrences. The nonfiction book is written in the third person perspective in order to provide a detailed and thorough overview of the law practices during the time of the case. The book specially focuses on the Supreme Court’s thought of governing leading up to the case, Gideon vs Wainwright, as well as the case itself. The case involves Clarence Gideon’s fight for his right to have an attorney in order to defend him in court. This written recollection has given an overlying theme to the entire book: the right to justice.

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

The

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

In my personal opinion, Pat Robertson’s book Courting Disaster is a very informative book. The book seems to be well researched and written with a vast amount of understanding from a Christian viewpoint. From my observation, I do tend to believe that even though he has done phenomenal research on the topic his ideas are still very one-sided and opinionated. Pat Robertson’s opinions and religious education, paired with his law background gives us an interesting take on the American judicial problems. Having said this, I would have much preferred a bit more open-mindedness in his arguments and less close-minded writing.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

the

Read More
2273 Words | 10 Pages

the

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

The

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

"You must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between. This is a sharp time, now, a precise time-we live no longer in the dusky afternoon when evil mixed itself with good and befuddled the world. Now, by God's grace, the shining sun is up, and them that fear not light will surely praise it." First we must look into how the Salem Village lived at that point in time. Back in those days, the Salem village people all were expected to go to church.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King's purpose of the letter is to persuade his audience that segregation is immoral, and deprives them of their equal freedoms. In paragraph 24, he emphasizes the greatness of many individuals who sought out their beliefs such as he does. He portrays the use of many rhetorical devices to create a deeper interpretation and understanding for the word “extremist.” The individuals who he describes each have their belief that leads them to being an “extremist.”     Firstly, just by reading the paragraph, you can notice the repetition of “extremist” and “we will be”, they evoke that it's important to fight for that you know is fair.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Many advocates for felons regaining voting rights believe the disenfranchisement of these felons is because of their race. Hull (2006) states, “according to U.S. government statistics two-thirds of those imprisoned are members of racial and ethnic minorities” (para. 7). These statistics show that more minorities are incarcerated than Caucasian people, but that doesn’t mean that it’s because of their race. For example, statistics also show that more men are incarcerated than women, so does that mean that it’s because of their sex? Of course not, the fact of the matter is that men commit more crimes than women because men are typically more aggressive, the same reasoning applies to race.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

The

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

the

Read More
1798 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Crime, its punishment, and the legislation that decides the way in which they interact has long been a public policy concern that reaches everyone within a given society. It is the function of the judicial system to distribute punishment equitably and following the law. The four traditional goals of punishment, as defined by Connecticut General Assembly (2001), are: “deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation.” However, how legislature achieves and balances these goals has changed due to the implementation of responses to changing societal influences. Mandatory minimum sentences exemplify this shift.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

In February 2002, a missing person case became a heart-melting homicide investigation. This was a test of morals and patients. A Quebec man was arrested and charged in the 2002 death of Adrienne McColl; the 21-year-old's body was found on February 17 in a Alberta field,16 years ago. Recently Gatineau police arrested 49-year-old Stéphane Parent, he is facing a second-degree murder charge in McColl's death. The facts that is evident to the general public in terms of this case are that Parent was fired from his job at the bar just days before McColl’s death, the bar owner reported that someone stole $8,400 from the restaurant.

Read More

More about Donald Dripps Model On The Contingent Suppression Order

Open Document