Analysis of “Notes from Underground” In Relation To Crime Theories Name Institutional Affiliation Analysis of “Notes from Underground” in relation to crime theories To restrict the vice from spreading further various parties have joined hands to provide the most effective solution. The government has concentrated in implementing forms of punishments that will be instrumental in curbing these crimes. These forms of punishments tend to strike fear in the civilians into embracing values that comply with the law. On the other hand, theorists have established theories that discover the core reasons influencing a criminal to do such activities. Such theories often solve various crimes because they tend to evaluate the causes of criminal …show more content…
He does not believe in using formulas to achieve things. Moreover, he does not believe in existence of laws that have a place in guiding his morality. In fact, he believes in radical personal freedom. He cites the reason for his beliefs being that the world is filled with a number of uncertainties; therefore, one does not need formulas to solve issues. The formulas might fail one, if the problem occurs in contrast to the expectations. On the other hand, the existence of laws tend to make people to revolt against such decrees. Hence, people rebel against fate and prefer to do what they want to achieve at the expense of what others expect from them. He cites an example where we believe 2+2=4, instead he suggests that we have to make 2+2=5. In essence, people prefer free will at the expense of laws. They are ready to embrace their ideals even if the consequences are severe. Such acts tend to cement the claims presented by the classical theory that man knows what he does. Moreover, he weighs the consequences and the benefits. If it strongly supports the later then he will promptly undertake the act. Hence, in the society, one will encounter people who tend to revolt against the society morals just to show that he embraces free will. Besides man does not prefer ready things instead he makes his own things. Even if the free will is in contrast with the popular beliefs man will have the urge to continue in his quest. Another instance that seems to oppose the law of nature is when he suffers with his various ailments. He embraces this approach instead of visiting the medical practitioners who will help in curing the ailments that are torturing his body. Moreover, he asserts that someone has the sole responsibility of defining his own character. In essence, the government or gods cannot shape someone’s