Doublethink In 1984

572 Words3 Pages

1984 by George Orwell is controlled, including the most natural impulses of sex and love. The suppression of these innate urges is encouraged through a program instituted by various forms of media in society in 1984 by George Orwell that propagates mistrust so severe that even mothers and fathers cannot trust their own children in another supposedly natural bond and impulse. Throughout the novel there are many examples of oppression of natural reactions and they cause a number of problems, not just for the main characters, but for the society at large. For this essay, you could provide detailed examples of how natural impulses are stifled and what consequences there are.

In 1984 george orwell wrote this book to get the audience to put themselves …show more content…

It is wrong of big brother to try to control the society the way it does in the book, they try to control the way they live in life and the way they …show more content…

In Newspeak, Orwell invents a language that will make rebellion impossible, because the words to conceive of such an action cease to exist. doublethink in the novel represents the ability to maintain two contradictory ideas in one’s head simultaneously and believe them both to be true.

Emmanuel Goldstein’s manifesto even suggests that doublethink is strongest among the powerful Inner Party members who convince themselves that they act for Big Brother, even though they know that Big Brother is a myth. Only because double thinking is a powerful thing in this novel they try making the citizens avoid double thinking.

In 1984 Doublethink is equally crucial to Winston’s gradual conversion to loving Big Brother because it enables him to accept his torturers’ words as true, even though his own fading memories of the photograph of the three Party traitors. This novel written by a great writer and also gave great examples of what could or could have happened in the past. We could use this novel to give us ideas of what not to do the future, and that we must avoid potential danger with our

More about Doublethink In 1984