Dr Grimesby Roylott Research Paper

673 Words3 Pages

At the conclusion of this vivid literary work by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Dr. Grimesby Roylott dies after being bitten by a Swamp Adder, the most venomous snake in India. I believe that Sherlock Holmes was not accountable for the passing of Dr. Roylott and was entirely innocent. When Sherlock initially saw the deadly creature he knew he had to act swiftly and defend himself and Dr. Watson. Furthermore, Dr. Roylott knew the treacherous snake would return eventually; yet, he still sat in the chair which left him vulnerable. The most vital fact is that, how was Sherlock to know that Dr. Roylott was in a susceptible position in the next room? There are countless aspects that show Sherlock Holmes’s innocence. Sherlock and Doctor Watson were sitting in the dark when all of sudden, Sherlock lashed out with his cane. He bellowed to Watson asking if he could see the object that Sherlock was striking. Sherlock released the cane and ignited a match while watching the mysterious creature disappear; however, it went into the ventilator. Suddenly, there was a blood curdling cry from Dr. Roylott’s room. When the attack occurred, Sherlock’s main concern was keeping himself and Dr. Watson …show more content…

Grimesby Roylott; though, he was not responsible for it. Sherlock Holmes was a completely innocent man. He was terrified when first seeing the snake and felt the need to defend himself. Nevertheless, Dr. Roylott made an unwise decision of sitting in a chair, unguarded, while the Swamp Adder had free range of the two rooms. An extremely important question is how was Sherlock Holmes to know the exact location and status of Dr. Roylott at the time of the attack? The detective was not aware of the position of Dr. Roylott; but, he did know that the snake was highly agitated and likely to attack the first person it came in contact with. Sadly the person met with this cruel fate was Dr. Roylott, yet I doubt his death will cause much