ipl-logo

Dred Scott: A Struggle For Freedom

825 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The impact of the dred scott decision

Dred Scott was born into slavery in 1795 in South Hampton County, Virginia. He was owned by Peter Blow and his family who moved from Virginia to Alabama and then to St. Louis, Missouri in 1830. After moving to Missouri Peter Blow died. The Blow family had to sell Dred Scott because of money problems and he was sold to Dr. John Emerson an army surgeon. Dr. Emerson and Dred Scott moved from Missouri to Fort Armstrong, Illinois. Illinois was a free state where they lived for two years and a half years. Dred did not know he could sue for his freedom while he was living in the free state of Illinois. In 1836 Dred Scott met Harriet Robinson at Fort Snelling in the Wisconsin Territory. Harriet was owned by Major Lawrence Toliaferro. Major Taliaferro was also a justice of the peace and he married Harriet and Dred in 1836. Harriet was now the property of Dr. Emerson because of her marriage to Dred Scott. Dred could have sued for his freedom again while living in Fort Snelling because it was part of the Missouri Comprise of 1820, but he did not know that.
In 1838 Dr. Emerson married Eliza Irene Sanford and moved his family to Louisiana because of an army transfer. Harriet was pregnant with her first baby in 1838 and was moving again with Dred and Dr. Emerson when she gave birth to Eliza Scott on a steamboat called the …show more content…

Irene Emerson that Dred Scott and his family were free. On March 22, 1852 the Missouri Supreme Court reversed it. Dred Scott and his attorneys went to the Federal Court, the United States Supreme Court. On March 6, 1857 the court said that the Scott family would stay slaves. Chief Justice Roger Taney said that because the Scott’s were African Americans they were not citizens of the United States and could not sue for their freedom. He also said that even though Scott once lived in Illinois and Wisconsin that were free, he lived in Missouri now and had to follow Missouri

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

Summary of Source The editorial discloses the power that the Court adheres to and whether it should be accountable for the decision making of fugitive slaves. The writer had discussed that in no way did the verdict of the Dred Scott case follow an act of law, but was merely “nullity.” During the settlement, they decided that since Dred Scott’s master had brought him on free land in Missouri or of the United States without having a citizenship, which resulted in him having no case. It continues on to say that the jurisdiction of the case was influenced by opinion, which did not involve any legalities.

Read More
232 Words | 1 Pages

He later got married to Ida Saxton on January 25, 1871. Then they had their first daughter. She, Katherine, was born, on

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

In 1851 Charles Edmund LaBeaume hired the Scotts for the next seven years. Mrs. Emerson moved to Massachusetts and married Dr. Calvin Chaffee in November 1850. He was an abolitionist and was elected to congress shortly after he was married. He had no idea about his wife and the slavery

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

To first understand why Mr. Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom, we have to understand the prelude to his story. Even before Dred Scott was born a case in London was buzzing that would emancipate slaves and some historians believe the case contributed to increasing colonial support for separatism in the Thirteen Colonies of British North America, by parties on both sides of the slavery question who wanted to establish independent government and law (Britannica). The case was Somerset v. Stewart and it has been deemed one of the most important legal actions in the history of the antislavery movement (Weiner 71). The facts of the case were that James Somerset was a slave of Charles Stewart, an officer in the British colony of Boston in

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

The Results of Dred Scott v Sanford had different effects on American history. This also contributed to the start of the civil war. Dred Scott v Sanford was a court decision on if Dred Scott could sue for his freedom. " According to Supreme Court History, Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was not a citizen. " This was otherwise known as an illegal case.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Marriage on the plantations of Samuel Scott was a business decision. Ultimately, slave owner’s business interests were that the slave population increase. Large slave families create a large workforce and of course a larger profit margin for the slaveholder. Slaveholders determined which couple might produce more offspring.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

In 1857, an African American man named Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court. His owners brought him along on their trips across free states. Dred Scott failed in suing before his case was presented in the Supreme Court. Roger B. Taney was the fifth chief Justice of the United States when he wrote the Dred Scott vs Sandford decision. The Dred Scott vs Sandford case ended with the decision that African Americans, free and enslaved, had no rights and could not become citizens because they were property.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Dred Scott was born was a slave in the state of Virginia and was owned by Peter Blow, who died in 1832. Scott only had two masters after Blow’s death; one lived in Wisconsin and later Illinois, both of which prohibited slavery, yet, Scott didn’t petition for freedom. Instead he met his wife Harriet. The two met their new master in Louisiana, who did not grant them freedom, so Scott looked for legal action to escape his slavery. Over a period of seven years, he went through trial and retrial until he was denied his final freedom in 1854.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

I 'm Dred Scott I 've been fighting for my freedom for me and my family. Have you ever wondered what it 's like being a slave for your whole life and never got an education?Well I 'm going to tell you how I became free. I had no choice where I lived or where I went. We colored people were considered property to other people.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

She helped develop the underground railroad, which helped many slaves escape to freedom. Harriet was born into slavery in Maryland, her birth name was Araminta. Growing up, her life was full of physical violence and pain. Many of the injuries that she sustained caused permanent damage which haunted her

Read More
94 Words | 1 Pages

The end result of the Dred Scott decision was Chief Justice Roger Taney 's decision that Congress did not possess the jurisdiction to stop slavery from spreading into other territories, even if they were considered free. Even worse, any free Black could now be allowably forced into slavery. Being forced into slavery was also seen as being beneficial to the free Blacks. Instead of reaching a decision as President Buchanan had hoped, it had started a rapid expansion of the conflict. This rapid expansion over the issue of slavery eventually led to the Civil War.

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

She was born by the name Araminta "Minty" Ross, in 1822 in Dorchester County, Maryland with eight other siblings. Harriet Tubman was raised into slavery and when she grew old enough to work she was hired out to local farmers on her plantation. Growing up, her mother, Harriet, was a cook for the Brodess family. Her father Ben, worked on timber on the Thompson 's

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

Harriet Tubman is a larger than life icon and an American hero. Harriet was born into a family of eleven children who were born into slavery. Benjamin Ross and Harriet Greene were her parents, and lived on a plantation in Dorchester County, Maryland. Harriet was put to work by the age of five, and served as a maid and children’s nurse. At the age of six Araminta was taken from her parents to live with James Cook, whose wife was a weaver, to learn the skills of weaving.

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

The Dred Scott decision of 1865 consisted of several implications on the status of free blacks in the United States, as well as concept of popular sovereignty, and the future of slavery in America. however, I believe the implications of the Dred Scott decision was for the status of free blacks in the United States due to the impacts it caused and the questions it rose. First of all, Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man from Missouri who moved in with his master Peter Blow, in Illinois, a free state. Dred Scott unsuccessfully fought for his freedom by claiming that being a resident in a free state made him a free man. However, in supreme court it was ruled that because blacks can not be recognized as citizens, they did not have

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

Read More

More about Dred Scott: A Struggle For Freedom

Related Topics

Open Document