Dred Scott Vs. Sandford Decision And John Brown's Raid

876 Words4 Pages

The Unpreventable War Could the bloodiest war, in American history, be prevented if the events that lead up to it did not occur? Imagine you and your neighbor are going through conflict. Within the North and South, there were many types of conflicts. However, these conflicts were not preventable. Unfortunately, there was a variety of events that lead up to the civil war. For instance, some of the ‘trigger’ events included: The Compromise of 1850, Bleeding Kansas, the Dred Scott vs. Sandford decision, and John Brown's Raid. These conflicts were immensely deep. This shows that the American civil war was essentially inevitable.
Most importantly, one of the first major events that contributed to the onset of the civil war was the Compromise of 1850. …show more content…

According to Bricker Jason, “Dred Scott resided for several years with his owner in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory, both of which prohibited slavery. Scott later claimed that this made him a free man, and he sued his owner to gain his freedom. The court ruled, “That slaves are property not people, or citizens, and that the Missouri Compromise prohibition on slavery about 36° 30° degree is unconstitutional” ( Edward T 398). The foundation of the division was seemly breaking further because the north felt the decision was in favor of the south, as it furthered their pro-slavery ideology as slaves were seen as something other than humans. Those who opposed slavery called it, “willful perversion of the law.” (O'Donnell, Edward T 384). The northern abolitionists outrage ultimately led to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 who had a strong opposition against slavery. The South relied heavily on slavery as it was the heart of their economy, however, the north was not in favor of the Dred Scott decision because they wanted to free slaves from

More about Dred Scott Vs. Sandford Decision And John Brown's Raid