According to Davis, he explained how mentally unstable a child can become without proper and adequate care and the outcomes of it. It was a huge eye opener when he found the cases of Anna and Isabelle. There had been no intention of help for the development of Anna due to she had no stable home. As for Isabelle she faced similar problems that Anna faced, but she received the expert help needed to become stable. The author elaborates more about these two cases and, what the outcomes are in each case with a possible positive reaction for one of the girls. My reaction to this articles was jaw dropping, because I would never imagine at such a young age of weeks of barely being born Anna was not wanted and treated without much care. Yet for this to happen throughout most of her life having to live in many different places and being kept in …show more content…
For example, Anna missed out on main agent of socialization such as a family, going to school, making peers. Each in which have influences on socialization especially on becoming someone in society. While assessing both the situations in the case, being able to neglect a child from help that they need is extremely sickening and irresponsible. Despite what Anna had gone through, her resocialization of learning new norms and behavior showed progress in areas slowly. That showed the first element of personality that Sigmund Freud discussed that could have been interpreted as the Id an inborn drive. As for Isabelle she received the main agents of socialization being family, going to school, and making peers. She got the expert attention that Anna did not, but with that being said Isabelle was able to reach great measures within two years she reached a normal mentality. She also showed the inborn drive known as the Id. Reading the article made me relate to how people see one with a disability. Some people have yet, to realize that people