ipl-logo

Drug Courts Vs Traditional Drug Courts Essay

1190 Words5 Pages

Drug courts focus on dealing with substance abuse or cases involving alcohol (Patchin & Keveles, 2004). This method desires to effectively battle the drug and alcohol problem by specifying the type of treatment. The drug courts can center their attention on the addressed drug and alcohol problem faster than traditional courts, while providing offenders with the appropriate method of rehabilitation or treatment. Drug courts: require for offenders to participate in random drug tests, can reward or discipline the offender based on their progress or failure to not to drugs, are available to selected participants, and can help offenders avoid a guilty charge in court if they are successful in their participation in the programs. A useful example regarding drug courts involve individuals who are normal substance abusers, but the traditional courts have found that their methods have not helped the offenders stay out of jail. Instead of going back to a traditional court, the drug courts can take their case and identify the specific treatment needed for the offender. By discovering the proper treatment, the offender can rehabilitate from their normal habitats and gain support to find better ways to be a productive member of society, while …show more content…

The program focuses on higher-risk offenders and the goal is to make sure the offenders are participating in specific treatment programs. For example, a person involved in a drug cartel could be forced into intensive supervision probation to ensure they are succeeding in their community and avoiding crime. Although research has shown in specific cases that intensive supervision can be slightly more cost effective compared to regular probation, it has also displayed the offenders are more likely to break their regulations because of how intensely they are being

Show More
Related
977 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, the decision underscores the crucial need for a legal process that prioritizes rehabilitation and treatment for individuals struggling with substance abuse and mental health issues, rather than relying solely on punitive measures. In essence, this ruling promotes a fairer justice system that respects constitutional rights and ensures that the imposition of criminal liability aligns with the presence of intent and voluntary

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

The justice system has to take a new approach to enforce law that place minor drug offenses in jail for long periods of time and actually

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Using juvenile drug court as an alternative to incarceration to decrease the rapidly increasing number of young offenders is a policy that includes various key concepts that one must understand. To start, juvenile drug courts are mostly voluntary. While some juvenile drug courts are mandated, this aspect has not motivated a vast majority of these courts to follow suit. Therefore, these programs are designed to keep youth from using any type of substance. These juveniles are obviously involved in this type of program due to their substance use/abuse issues.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, there is typically a focus on rehabilitation, treatment, and providing resources in these courts. Regardless, there is a lack of systemic changes in these courts because they do not find and address root causes for such type of criminal behavior. Some systemic inequalities and biases make it difficult for some people to access services. Finally, the decriminalization model is applied to these courts to separate these crimes and provide alternative approaches to appropriate criminalization. With that being said, overcriminalization and over-incarceration are viewed as common structural issues for nonviolent offenders.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

(NADCP, n.d.) Drug Courts were created to provide an alternative for non-violent drug offense in order for the courts to reduce substance abuse through rehabilitation and future recidivism possibilities through probation monitoring efforts and treatment facilities and other therapeutic services. Drug courts specialize in specific issues to reach goals of non-violent drug offenders through screening and assessments to evaluate the risk, treatment, and how the offender will respond to the efforts. Drug courts also employ the efforts of monitoring and drug testing through probation, as well as outpatient and

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

The prisoners that have struggled with drugs are place in a pre-released program to prepare them for their release. I think the justice system hands are tied a little bit to maintain the prisons and community well

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

The creation of drug courts has had many positive effects on millions of lives and has helped with keeping certain familiar faces out of court. Though due to are countries fiscal crisis many programs have been cut or expansion has ceased. The criminal justice systems cost roughly 70 billion annual on the corrections system which is because of over reliance on incarceration. Instead of spending so much to increate people the courts could be sending them to reform programs that end

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

The first drug court was established in Miami-Dade, Florida in 1989. Drug courts were established because of the “revolving door of drug use” and increasing recidivism rates. Drug courts have the ability to change a person’s life for the better by teaching them how to beat their addictions while providing the proper treatments for each offender. As a result, of the ongoing development of drug courts it is unfair to expect the system to be indefectible. Still, there are many benefits in participating in the drug court system.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

On April 20 of this year I attended the drug court which is located in the Erie County Courthouse. The Drug Court is intended to promote healthy and law-abiding behavior for its participants. It acts as an alternative for jail and an individual is free to live in the community as long he or she participates in all services, along with being subject to random drug testing.

Read More
1157 Words | 5 Pages

The publication by Christina M. Gaudio is critical of the War on Drugs and focuses on its effects on juveniles. She takes time to outline the issues that are present with our current system, and specifically how the system is particularly unjust to juveniles. Gaudio details how the juvenile justice system operates state and federally, then she gives a brief history of the Drug War, the Drug Wars effect on Juveniles, its overall effectiveness, and possible solutions to what she sees as the problem. The Drug War is extremely costly to the taxpayer and is in many respects failing.

Read More
1728 Words | 7 Pages

The Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program is another attempt to provide better treatment for people who are convicted. The study showed that drug offenders who underwent a treatment program outside of prison had a 26 percent less rate of re-arrest after two years than a control group that was sent to prison (Justice Policy Institute, 2010). Rehabilitative programs like the Second Chance Act and the Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program has shown to growth and positive

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

This model focuses on the individual needs of the offender and in doing so increases their chance of living sober once they reenter society. For example, indeterminate sentencing allows offenders who exhibit good behavior and participate in prison substance abuse programs to be paroled closer to the minimum sentencing term. This means the offender can be released from prison based on conditions set forth by the court. If the offender violates parole by committing another crime or failing to continue substance abuse treatment, they can be returned to prison. Furthermore, offering indeterminate sentencing for offenders who meet the criteria creates prison space thus helping with the ongoing problem of prison overcrowding (Seiter,

Read More
1230 Words | 5 Pages

Rehabilitation gives the person a chance to learn about his/her problems and offers them to learn how to change their behavior in order to not commit crime while incarceration puts the offender in a cell in order for one to think about the crime he/she committed. Rehab is suppose to help ease the offender 's reentry. Unlike rehabilitation, punishment does not offer one help, unless one is in the process of rehabilitation or other alternative programs while “behind bars.” Incarceration is widely used in the adult system, while rehabilitation is a selective program which is not always offered to all or at specific locations. It is possible that rehabilitation can be related to drugs such as drug addiction rehab, alcohol addiction rehab, violent behavior rehab, gambling addiction rehab, and even many more.

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

Another specialized court that a community might benefit from establishing is a mental health court. The aim of mental health courts is to connect people with mental illness, that display deviant behavior, to mental health resources and social services that can better deal with cases such as these as an option for individuals who need to be treated more than they need to be imprisoned (A Promising Alternative, 2011). One good reason to creating drug and mental health courts in a community is their goal to problem solve rather than just push defendants through the conveyor belt or revolving door

Read More
2078 Words | 9 Pages

This leads to the question of whether the justice system is doing an adequate job of dealing with drug addiction. Instead of incarcerating people for drug abuse, an alternative is treating victims by rehab and treatment. This paper will exam why treatment is the superior option for

Read More

More about Drug Courts Vs Traditional Drug Courts Essay

Related Topics

Open Document