Drug Courts Vs Traditional Drug Courts Essay

Drug courts focus on dealing with substance abuse or cases involving alcohol (Patchin & Keveles, 2004). This method desires to effectively battle the drug and alcohol problem by specifying the type of treatment. The drug courts can center their attention on the addressed drug and alcohol problem faster than traditional courts, while providing offenders with the appropriate method of rehabilitation or treatment. Drug courts: require for offenders to participate in random drug tests, can reward or discipline the offender based on their progress or failure to not to drugs, are available to selected participants, and can help offenders avoid a guilty charge in court if they are successful in their participation in the programs. A useful example regarding drug courts involve individuals who are normal substance abusers, but the traditional courts have found that their methods have not helped the offenders stay out of jail. Instead of going back to a traditional court, the drug courts can take their case and identify the specific treatment needed for the offender. By discovering the proper treatment, the offender can rehabilitate from their normal habitats and gain support to find better ways to be a productive member of society, while

The program focuses on higher-risk offenders and the goal is to make sure the offenders are participating in specific treatment programs. For example, a person involved in a drug cartel could be forced into intensive supervision probation to ensure they are succeeding in their community and avoiding crime. Although research has shown in specific cases that intensive supervision can be slightly more cost effective compared to regular probation, it has also displayed the offenders are more likely to break their regulations because of how intensely they are being