ipl-logo

Eat Animals The Nice Way Analysis

751 Words4 Pages

You could save an animal from drowning, but you could save a person from drowning too; the choice is difficult. You could protest for animals to have rights and not be tortured at slaughterhouses and still eat them from factories that do things like kill them in an abusive way. Animal rights, animals should have some rights with some limitations. I have issues involving this topic about animal rights because i have mixed emotions about how we can experiment and torture animals but still have them as pets. In articles by Jeff McMahan, “Eat Animals The Nice Way”, and by Maureen Nandi Mitra, “Animals Are Persons, too”, they talk from two different positions where we should eat animals and another where we shouldn’t experiment on them and let them be. The both sides of this topic are very controversial because there are many opinions about this and in this essay i will explain the both sides and in between of the argument. Between the arguments of animals being experimented on and animals being people who are our pets; there is a major controversial conflict about it. In the article, “Eating Animals the Nice Way.” by Jeff McMahan, he states, “Many people are opposed to factory farming because of the terrible suffering it inflicts on animals, yet see no …show more content…

Many of us can have different opinions on what animal rights mean and what it is. We can have two sides on it, one is where we should stop the cruelty and stop many factories from brutalizing the animals they have, and another side where we could just don’t do anything and leave them be and accept the fact that we eat them. I know if someone can stop any industries it’s us because we have the mindset to do it and accomplish it, carpe diem. Lastly, we should have animal rights with some limitations and taking some things under

Show More
Related
155 Words | 1 Pages

It is basically survival of the fittest. Giving animal’s rights should be necessary only if they are being abused. For example, forcing dogs to fight other dogs till one is dead. If the animals are killed for our basic human needs than it should not be wrong. I agree with Bob Stevens in his letter to Rifkins when he mentions the fact that pigs would get toys even though there are human beings in the world who do not have such things.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

For vegetarians, animal rights should trump human rights. In “Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights,” Tom Regan defines animal rights as “the natural right to life” (307). Similar to Regan, many vegetarians believe that animals have rights and deserve to have their best interests taken into consideration, regardless of whether they are useful to humans. By switching to a plant-base diet, people will be able to alleviate the needless suffering and deaths of countless animals. Besides, in the same article, Regan also suggests “to treat animals in a more humane manner” (308).

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals is a book about persuasion. Foer seeks to convince his readers to take any step in reducing what he believes is the injustice of harming animals. To achieve this, Foer employs many persuasion techniques and often changes his approach when he targets specific groups. His strategies include establishing himself as an ethical authority and appealing to his readers’ emotions, morals, and reason.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Animals having rights will change medical research, for example, If we do not have animals to experiment on to cure cancer, positive medicine for illness or disease then the death rate will go up. Testable Samaniego 1 products that a person uses on a daily bases such as, make-up, skin products, hair products, etc. Experiments can also be a good use to animals, “a 300 pound gorilla named koko was taught sign language and has mastered more than 1,000 signs and understands several thousand english words.” That being said, animals can be a helpful use for many things, making the world a better place.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

How animals are treated can also affect daily human life. Animal rights are rights given to animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse and enumerates further rights for laboratory animals, farm animals, companion animals, and wildlife. Some animals should have a Bill of Rights. This law does go against centuries of human culture. This law would increase the cost of food.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Gary Steiner writes “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable” to address the questions around animal treatment. Steiner essay originally appeared in the New York Times in 2009. He wrote this essay in hopes to communicate with the general public. This is clear because it was published in a newspaper article which is intended for a variety of readers due to the company large audience. Steiner’s main claim that he is trying to make is “most people just don’t care about the lives or fortunes of animals” (771).

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The biggest arguments can be condensed down into if an animal is considered to be apart of the moral community or not. Often times if we considered them a member of the moral community it is wrong to hurt them, or use them, and if they are not apart of the member of the moral community it would be okay to hurt and use them. This is an abstract way of looking at the potential arguments and ideas for animal rights. A more indepth view of animal rights can be taken from Peter Singer’s Utilitarian Arguments. These essentially say that doing moral things makes you happy, and acting immoral causes pain, and animals can clearly feel pain, therefore animals are apart of the moral community.

Read More
1401 Words | 6 Pages

Animals carry an important role throughout human lives every day. Humans look to animals for numerous things such as: pets, a means of production, food, entertainment, experimental means, etc. Many animals carry human like traits, which raises many arguments and different positions on the subject of whether animals deserve rights while others feel that animals are simply animals, but may have certain interests that humans are obligated to respect. The issue is that many people confuse the terms animal rights and animal welfare when there is a fundamental difference between the two that revolves around the rights that humans have to use animals. There are many animal rights organizations including but not limited to: Best Friend’s Animal Society, The Humane Society of the United States, and the largest animal’s rights movement, People for Ethical

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

I think that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, but I still find it morally wrong to abuse an animal or cause unnecessary pain. I do not believe in animal rights, but I do believe in the animal welfare philosophy,

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

"Humans act immorally often enough, but only they-not wolves or moneys- can discern, by applying some moral to the facts of a case, that a given act ought or ought not to be performed" argues Carl Cohen in his book Arguing about Bioethics (208). The animal rights movement has been active since 1822, although it was not known as "the animal rights movement," it was still a prominent issue (Walls). Animals should be protected, but rights do not equal obligation and animals are not moral agents. Animals should not have rights.

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

As a society there should be a continuation of proceeding to develop new laws. Animals have rights that are not being protected or considered when they are not given the chance to live without suffering or harm. Additionally animal rights are violated when they are used as products for experimentation. Animal experimentations

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

Another agreement on should animals have rights debate anonymous user ‘’ Why should animals have the right to make it hard to get food and mess with research and testing’’. I strongly agree with this statement because it's hard enough for the government to keep everyone in under control why would we try and waste money to keep animals under control. On the other hand people hurting animals and making it public does not help out going against the statement ’’animals need rights’’so why can't we just leave it as it is and live our lives and according to the film blackfish a trainer at seaworld stated “why should people capture animals for entertainment” i see what the trainer is saying but the U.S needs money and the way we make it doesn't

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

I Believe some animals should receive some bill of rights. And we can change that we can make them happy by respecting them loving them and treating them right. We have to watch out for them as if they were a friend of

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand there are some people who believe animals should not have basic human rights. Perhaps they don 't deserve it because animals don 't know right from wrong when their natural instinct is to survive. You can 't punish a animal for killing another animal the way you can punish a human for murder. Humans understand right from wrong. Giving animals basic human rights is also not a good idea because giving animals human rights would mean not being able to test on animals.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Animals Should Have Rights The issue on animal rights can be approached from a variety of perspectives. Animal rights is the belief that animals have an intrinsic value separate from any value they have to humans, and are worthy or moral consideration (About, 2014). The argument on an animal’s interest isn’t derived from elevating their rights to that equal of humans, nor giving them more rights. The real question is whether or not animals should have interests and to what capacity.

Read More

More about Eat Animals The Nice Way Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document