The Electoral College is the election of the president and vice president where for over a hundred years the electors were equired to be chosen by the voters with the exception of Members of Cogress. When each state votes, “the voters cast a single vote for their preferred candidates, they are actually voting for the slate of electors in their state pledged to those candidates” (Neale 2017, p.1) so the people have a voice, but their are knowledgeable electors who have the final say. It is also very possible with this set up that the winner of the electoral votes does not always get the popular vote (Posner, 2012). Madison believed that the Electoral College would “keep the states involved, but retain the role of the people” (Ornstein 2001, …show more content…
The smaller states are weighted to give them more electoral votes, but because of the popular vote the larger states still have a bigger pay off in the end.
No states has enough electoral votes to elect a president and by a president focusing on a specific region of the US, they gain little to no power because the other states that are excluded, majority of the time will not vote for that candidate based off of the fact they do not believe they would benefit from their vote (Posner, 2012).
Swing States are the ones that pay most attention to the election knowing they are the difference and will recieve the most attention from the candidates. This makes the people of those swing state very causcious in their desicions and should be one of the greater impacts of the elections (Posner, 2012).
Cons
In an election reform, elections are underfunded and need to save money for proper equipment and trained personnel to keep uniformed ballots for federal elections, and universaol poll-closing time (Ornstein 2001, p. 16). By not having enough finances, the technology for the ballots are not always updated and there should only have one easy ballot with the same exact choices while having times for ballots opening and closing at the same time according to time