ipl-logo

Eminent Domain And Its Effects On Native Americans

533 Words3 Pages

From a cultural lens, eminent domain has resulted in blunt acts of racism and warped the perception of culture to those at the short end of the stick. People who are pro-eminent domain use it as a way to justify their racism and hatred for immigrants. Eminent domain has affected the way of life for people, especially minorities. Being a minority in cases where eminent domain is involved will most likely lead to the government winning, and getting its way. The government’s intervention in the lives of people can cause a shift in their norms that can lead to irreversible damage that they must endure. Future generations will have no connection or knowledge of their ancestral history, only knowing what happened after the acts of eminent domain. After the amalgamation of …show more content…

Rather than never having to hear the end of it, Native Americans began to resent their culture and encouraged fellow tribe members to do the same. They thought that it would be best for them in the long run, to look out for their family. Those who chose to continue practicing their culture were treated very poorly by both other natives and white people. The Europeans had implemented this way of thinking that everything and everyone should be the same, that they should all live the same lifestyle -- that anything that was against the majority, was wrong, into the minds of several Native Americans. Their desire to control the lives and property of others spread from one another like rapid fire. Others could care less about the well-being of the natives, regardless if they were converted, they wanted their

Show More
Related
448 Words | 2 Pages

The Native Americans do not have the ability to give land to Americans and Americans cannot obtain it from them. Judgment The judgment was affirmed.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

“The settler colonial logic of elimination in its crudest form, a violent rejection of all things Indian, was transformed into a paternalistic mode of governmentality which, though still sanctioned by state violence, came to focus on assimilation rather than rejection.” –Patrick Wolfe, After the Frontier: Separation and Absorption in US Indian Policy, 13 Wolfe’s statement illustrates how the US government put more emphasis on legalized absorption of Indians into the White society rather than using forceful and violent methods to acquire the Natives’ land. After the colonization of the westward land and the end of the Frontier era, the US government’s method of assimilation of the Indians started revolving around allotment and blood quanta. With no place to further push the Natives away, the established Bureau of Indian Affairs and the government took action to eliminate the Natives culturally and spiritually instead of physically.

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

During the Gilded Age one of the most “ferocious battles for control” for America’s resources took place and is referred to in Edwards’ New Spirits as a “war of incorporation.” In the midst of these battles for corporate power many, if not all, of America’s minorities were used as pawns; most notably the Native Americans who, as a result of the incorporation, lost nearly all of their land and cultural identity. The Native Americans were targeted by the American government and its people because of their land. Edwards describes the process of wrestling the land from its rightful inhabitants as “bloody, complicated, and costly.”

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

We are ‘settlers’. We take up land that belongs to us, American citizens, by paying the government price for it.” (Burton 238). This comment on a deeper context was the view and beliefs of American in 1848. Additionally, the social hierarchy is apparent and supports Alamar’s comment that there is inequality and prejudices within the U.S. government.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The existence of tribal sovereignty over hundreds of years has sparked the assimilation that the doctrine of American Indians is not only a lawful perception, but also an essential component that defines the evolution of our country. Tribal sovereignty addresses the right for tribes to govern themselves (Internet citation) and for them to mandate their property and their land’s decisions, but if so is the case, why have infinite number of tribes been removed from their territories? Without a doubt, this paper will explore and argue how our country has been affected because of unfair laws and policies that have unreasonably been established to tribes. In order to justify this argument, I will discuss the concerns revolving the Doctrine Discovery,

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

What if someone had come to your home and told you that you and your family had to relocate to a new place? This had been the home you grew up in, your parents grew up in, and your grandparents had grown up in; and the property your home sat on had been in your family for generations. How would you deal with federal officers telling you that you had to leave the only home that you had ever known? Imagine how the Indians felt when the Indian Removal Act was passed. Native Americans were pressured to negotiate treaties for relocation from their homelands in the East to Indian Territory in the West; so that the white settlers could expand their colonies.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

As white settlers moved in, Native American tribes were slowly forced out through laws and treaties. They were treated with little respect, moved from their homes onto smaller strips of land called reservations, and having their culture stripped from them by being forcibly assimilated into American culture. The Homestead Act is unfair towards Native Americans and takes away their rightful homes.

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

When the settlers of Europe first came to the new world, they were introduced to the Native Americans. The settlers wanted the Natives to follow their culture and its benefits such as education, religion, and the usage of the environment. The Native Americans refused the request, stating they have their own type of culture, believing it to be the most superior; as a result, the Natives’ statement angered the ethnocentric settlers. Consequently, this caused a conflict between the two groups because of their culture differences. Firstly, the main culture difference consists of religion, tradition, and way of living.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

Rural area residents and Indigenous communities will face repercussions amidst the expansion of businesses in Austin. Expansion may include overtaking of rural land and building on property that is deemed Indigenous land. This raises an ethical dilemma the city of Austin faces about the importance of the preservation of historical structures in the city. A feasible course of action that could be taken to counteract this problem is the passing of Austin legislation that would allow policymakers to protect sacred lands and historical properties against new development. Lastly, the expansion of AI technology into Austin raises concerns and problems regarding Austin’s local businesses.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

Due to Westward Expansion in the late 1800s, the Native American's land was taken away by the U.S. government. The U.S. government made the wrong decision to take Native American land and give it to the settlers. Native Americans had the land first. However, people who disagree say the U.S. had a growing population and they needed a place to live and farm. The government’s decision to take Native American’s land was an atrocity.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

With the arrival of Anglo-Americans, Native Americans lost much more than just their land. Tribes were forced onto reservations, stripped of their culture, wealth and place in society, with no hope of regaining what they owned unless by complete assimilation. For the latter half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, many Anglo-Americans continually pushed for Native Americans to abandon their cultures and “savage” ways. However, despite the many attempts to force Natives into Anglo-American culture, many Native Americans found ways to negotiate with the demands of the Anglo-Americans through mainly social, economic and legal means.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

When the Europeans began colonizing the New World, they had a problematic relationship with the Native Americans. The Europeans sought to control a land that the Natives inhabited all their lives. They came and decided to take whatever they wanted regardless of how it affected the Native Americans. They legislated several laws, such as the Indian Removal Act, to establish their authority. The Indian Removal Act had a negative impact on the Native Americans because they were driven away from their ancestral homes, forced to adopt a different lifestyle, and their journey westwards caused the deaths of many Native Americans.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Native Americans flourished in North America, but over time white settlers came and started invading their territory. Native Americans were constantly being thrown and pushed off their land. Sorrowfully this continued as the Americans looked for new opportunities and land in the West. When the whites came to the west, it changed the Native American’s lives forever. The Native Americans had to adapt to the whites, which was difficult for them.

Read More
1296 Words | 6 Pages

Whenever a group of people moves into another area, problems arise between the different cultures. Both sides stereotyped one another and used violence to gain revenge against anyone that looked like the enemy-even if they were innocent of any injustices against that side. Americans responded to the violence that occurred between tribes by forming reservations with the intent to control the tribes and assimilate them. Native Americans were sent through school systems that did not have competent teachers or grant good housing opportunities; that lack of space allowed for measles and smallpox to spread quickly and kill many Native Americans (Pease PowerPoint 13 Gospel of

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

My name is Camila Anderson and I believe human experimentation is ethical. Human experimentation has been going on for hundreds of years, with a lot of knowledge learned, with lives saved. Thanks to human experimentation, the human lifespan has increased, infant deaths dropped by 75%, and diseases believed incurable are cured. Human experimentation has given us more knowledge about our bodies that animals nor technology could ever provide. One group of people can save an entire population.

Read More

More about Eminent Domain And Its Effects On Native Americans

Related Topics

Open Document