ipl-logo

Ernesto Miranda Legal Brief

1061 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The case miranda v. arizona 1966 essay

Legal Brief (About 2 pages)
Case Name:
Case Number:

If you like you can copy/paste this for your notes:
“Quotation”
In Text Citation:
Works Cited citation
Why this is important/Why I want to use it:

Paragraph #1: Facts of the case
Ernesto Miranda was born in March (1940) in Mesa, Arizona, he skipped class, often went to a

prison for teens after burgering, then later he went to California to join the army and start a new

life. On “March 2, 1963”, he pushed an 18 year old woman into the backseat of his car. He drove

her for 20 minutes, then he sexually assaulted her and robbed his victim as he did with 3 others.

He drove 20 blocks from her house and let her free. She ran home where her sister found her and

called the police. …show more content…

Later he got 20 to 30 years in prison for assaulting and armed robbery. Later his

lawyer appealed to the United States Supreme Court of Arizona asking if he was given the rights

while being arrested. On June 13, 1966 their appeal was accepted and the court agreed on hearing

him because as it turns out he was interrogated for 2 hours without knowing that he has the right

to remain silent (5th Amendment) (United States Courts, 2017), and the right for a lawyer (6th

Amendment). “Miranda v. Arizona” was called that because the police made a mistake and it

was the police of Arizona which made it go farther to the Supreme Court which is bigger that's

why the state counts. (United States Courts, 2014).This is why the case began.

Paragraph #2: The Law and Legal Questions
The Fifth Amendment is “No person told you held To answer for a capital, or otherwise Infamous

crime”. It means that no person can be forced to speak whatsoever. When Miranda was arrested

the police were supposed to inform him about his two rights (Right to keep quiet and write for a

lawyer) (United States Courts, 2017) he didn't have a choice and he was asked questions for 2

hours. He wrote his confession and three women that he assaulted gave the majority …show more content…

(n.d.-b). {{Meta.siteName}}. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759#:~:text=majority%20opinion%20by%20Earl%20Warren
Google Drive: Sign-in. (n.d.). Accounts.google.com. Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/16QNlgiwMeKIoD6viO74z2gVF-x64l_iu/view
History.com Editors. (2009, November 9). Miranda Rights. HISTORY. https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/miranda-rights mcbride. (2005). The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Miranda v. Arizona (1966) | PBS. Thirteen.org. https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_miranda.html
Public Reaction. (n.d.). Miranda v. Arizona: Rebalancing Rights and Responsibilities. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from http://76307797.weebly.com/public-reaction.html#:~:text=The%20sudden%20introduction%20of%20Miranda
United States Courts. (2014). Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona. United States Courts. https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-miranda-v-arizona
United States Courts. (2017). United States Courts.

Show More
Related

Summary Of Miranda V Arizona 384 US 436

529 Words | 3 Pages

Can the confession Miranda gave be used in trial against him? In a 5-4 decision, the court determined that in order for an interrogation and the statements made on behalf of the defendant to be considered as evidence, and in order to protect the accused, the accused needs to be aware of the fact that he/she has the right to an attorney, aware of self incrimination, and will need to voluntarily give up their right to these things if they choose to do so. In this case it was decided that it was not acceptable to use the confession Miranda made against him, and his rights were violated. If any of these criteria are not met, any statements made during an interrogation cannot be used against the defendant, otherwise their rights would be violated. This case is very significant because it changed the way officers perform their duties, and all accused must be read their miranda

Read More

Forensic Science: The Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

712 Words | 3 Pages

Rachel Ortiz- Wynne Ms. Bonner Forensic Science Date assigned: 4 October 2017 Date due: 17 October 2017 Miranda v. Arizona The case of Miranda versus the state of Arizona started out when Ernesto Miranda was arrested. The crime committed was an armed robbery, kidnap and rape of an 18 year old girl.

Read More

Assignment 2: Briefing Of Miranda V. Arizona

783 Words | 4 Pages

The arguments in the case began when the defense, who was representing Miranda, made an objection to allowing into evidence the written confession due to Miranda not being properly informed of his constitutional rights. This particular argument originates from the fact that officers had admitted that they did not read Miranda his right to an attorney; they also read his right to a voluntary confession out loud before receiving an oral confession. The State of Arizona then presented their argument that because he did not specifically ask for an attorney, none of his rights were violated. The purpose of their argument was to make certain that the written confession was applied as evidence to charge him with the

Read More

Summary Of Miranda Vs Arizona Case Brief

531 Words | 3 Pages

Case Brief Case: Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Facts: The Miranda warning, which informs criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to an attorney while they are in police custody or being questioned in a detention facility, was created by the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966). It was brought by Ernesto Miranda, who was detained under the charges of rape, kidnapping and robbery. He wasn't told of his right to an attorney or the right to remain silent before being questioned by the police, so Miranda admitted to the crimes while being interviewed. The confession was admitted into evidence during the trial, and Miranda was found guilty. Procedural History: After Miranda was convicted, he appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court who reaffirmed his rights had not been violated.

Read More

Miranda Vs Arizona Case Summary

734 Words | 3 Pages

The Miranda v. Arizona Case of 1966 The Miranda v. Arizona case was a Supreme court case that was caused by an arrest that happened on March 13th, 1963. A man by the name of Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his home for sexual assault and kidnapping and brought into the police station for questioning. The interrogation went on for two hours when finally, police got a written confession by Miranda that he did these crimes. After police got his confession, it was later realized that Miranda wrote this confession without being informed of the right to have an attorney present while being questioned. It was ruled that Ernesto was guilty of the crimes and an appeal by the Supreme Court concluded that his rights were not violated because he did not

Read More

Essay On The Civil Rights Case Of Anders Vs Texas

1386 Words | 6 Pages

Pete Hernandez had been tried in Jackson County, Texas.  Local attorneys Gus Garcia caught wind of Pete’s unfair, and frankly unconstitutional, ruling and decided to take the case into his own hands for an appell. Gus Garcia saw this case as an opportunity to extend the constitutional rights of Mexican Americans. Garcia teamed up with other brilliant attorneys and “they challenged the state’s systematic exclusion of persons of Mexican origin from all types of jury duty. ”(1)

Read More

Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

682 Words | 3 Pages

Although Miranda wrote on a paper stating that he was aware of his legal rights. His lawyers are claiming that he was not in fact fully aware of his legal rights so his confession should not be deemed valid to be used against him in

Read More

A Very Popular Criminal Case: Miranda V. Arizona

94 Words | 1 Pages

Miranda v. Arizona is a very popular criminal case, it occurred in 1966. Miranda v. Arizona is a case where a man, Ernesto Miranda, was charged for rape, kidnapping and robbery. When he was sent to interrogation the police officers did not advise him about his rights as criminal. Thanks to Ernesto Miranda, officers must say the rights we have when being arrested, these rights are called The Miranda Rights. However, Ernesto Miranda was an eighth grade dropout, at the age of 22 he kidnapped and raped a mildly retarded 18 year old

Read More

Miranda Vs Arizona Dbq

528 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the 1900s, the critical motion of the Civil Rights Movement greatly influenced society. The various cases that were introduced in courts impacted the fight for equality as well as the creation of stronger laws. A powerful case in this era was Miranda v. Arizona. In this case, a man that confessed to accusations was set free because he was not advised of his rights to remain silent and request a lawyer. The ruling of this case shows the fulfillment of the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination by showing the importance of the Fifth Amendment, the signifcance of the right to an attorney, and that under the law, you are innocent until proven guilty.

Read More

Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

879 Words | 4 Pages

Miranda vs. Arizona (1966) Miranda v. State of Arizona; Westover v. United States; Vignera v. State of New York; State of California v. Stewart 384 U.S. 436 86 S. Ct. 1602; 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2817; 10 A.L.R.3d 974. This case involves the fifth and sixth amendments of the US constitution, as well as the grand jury indictment clause of the fourteenth amendment. The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. In each of these cases, the defendant was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world. In none of these cases was the defendant given a full and effective warning of his

Read More

Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

587 Words | 3 Pages

David Joseph Solis Prof. Richard Manderfield WRA 115, Section 001 October 7 2015 Miranda v. Arizona, a Spark of Democracy In 1966, a Supreme Court ruling became one of the most important cases that are studied in today’s history classes. Miranda v. Arizona, a case that began when Ernesto Miranda confessed to the authorities that he indeed, raped a teenage female. Even though Miranda did not know his rights nor was he informed of them, he signed a confession where it stated that he knew his rights. The Miranda v. Arizona case did not only establish the Miranda rights, but became a symbol of democracy; an important cultural value in the United States.

Read More

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

744 Words | 3 Pages

“Miranda written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty ("Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona," n.d.). Miranda v. Arizona: After Miranda's conviction was revoked by the Supreme Court, the State of Arizona retried him. At the second trial, Miranda's admission was not brought into evidence. Miranda was indeed indicted and condemned to 20-30 years in jail.

Read More

Alito's Attack On Miranda Warnings Is Worse Than It Seems By Mark Stern

1486 Words | 6 Pages

Through the disclosure of rights and encouragement of legal counsel, Miranda warnings provide a suspect with the opportunity to have legal representation to help protect them from unintentional or involuntary confessions. Legal representatives can provide protection against deceitful interrogation and potential violations of their rights. The second reason I support the argument is that Miranda V. Arizona prevents susceptible individuals from being influenced by forceful or deceitful interrogation tactics that aim to manipulate suspects into providing information or confessions. In many situations, police officers and other law enforcement officials will attempt to lie and manipulate a detainee into providing information.

Read More

Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

713 Words | 3 Pages

Supreme Court decided the historic case of Miranda v. Arizona, stating that when a person is taken into police custody, before being interrogated he or she must be told of the Fifth Amendment right not to make any self-incriminating statement (Criminal.findlaw.com, 2017). When in the police custody they have to tell you the four things before being questioned about anything. Having to be questioned a suspect in custody devoid of having given the Miranda warning, any statement or confession made is supposed to be involuntary, and cannot be used against the suspect in any criminal case. The law requires that officers read Miranda rights to a suspect in custody prior to their questioning or interrogation (Criminal.findlaw.com, 2017).For saying the Miranda rights it informs the suspect that he/she have the right to remain silent, that anything he

Read More

Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

861 Words | 4 Pages

There were a lot of amendments that were looked into during this case but the couple that mostly stood out were fifth and sixth amendments because they supported Miranda’s attorney and had not been told to Miranda while the whole integration period or before that time. The court made his final decision by ruling the case unconstitutional because it violated miranda’s

Read More

More about Ernesto Miranda Legal Brief

Related Topics

Open Document