The Play Macbeth provided a unique experience to fully appreciate what I have learned in class because of all the aspects taught to me being in, and, out of the play. Albeit, I appreciated much of what I learned not because of its clear representation in the play, but rather the lack of it. Unlike the other plays I watched, this play needed some improvement over how they relayed their information. Other than that, many of the aspects taught in the speech were attributed in the play. The play Macbeth had good transitions, body language, and expressions. But I also lacked many things, such as the tone of the actors (in some instances only), a badly presented flow of the plot, and most of all the speed at which the actors were talking, which made …show more content…
I did not see one moment when they were unsure of doing something required of them from the play. They were always in character, even during mistakes and did not give up their attention. Through body language, they were able to portray the mood of the characters. Body language is important to project an image in the viewer's mind that will decide how they feel the character is feeling. And with every scene, the actors showed how they felt instead of telling. Which really delve us into the character and its emotions. Transitions were important to this play due to the number of different scenes that were present. Even with so many changes in the setting, the play kept the viewer connected to the plot. The actors created transitions which their acting complemented – creating a single stream of thought. Being an actor also requires confidence, if not in real life, at least when acting. And the actors no doubt were present with it when they were performing. In times of anger, they portrayed their best versions of anger. Yet it only showed how the character felt and not how the audience should feel about them. Sympathy created through text was marginal and the actors had a very big