People in power should have full responsibility to select the most beneficial charities and philanthropies to receive donations; they should do all they can to successfully make a change. Individuals in positions of power are those who appear to be at the top of their food chains and have more advantages. People who give just enough to appear charitable but not enough to put themselves in an uncomfortable position. Individuals who are so wealthy that they can support numerous charities while still wearing the newest fashions and living in the largest homes. These individuals refuse to use their increased status and opportunities to donate for their selfish pleasure. Giving to charities and philanthropies is generally less effective when individuals …show more content…
One article that demonstrates the significance of helping those less fortunate is Andrew Carnegie's The Gospel of Wealth. In spite of his disapproval of contributing directly to the poor out of concern about financial mismanagement, Carnegie is trying to convey a common message. We must give in order to better our society. One quote that shows this ideal is ¨In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves; to provide part of the means which by those who desire to improve may do so; to give those who desire to rise the aids by which they may rise ; to assist, but rarely or never to do all.¨(Carnegie Paragraph 2). Some articles like LifeBoat Ethics by Garret Hardin state that giving is not needed and it wont make a difference. In reality, giving is one of the most important parts of society. The world depends on people supporting and uplifting and developing one another. Both charities and philanthropies might expand and become even more beneficial while advancing our society with a little rearrangement and more people in positions of authority taking