ipl-logo

Essay On Authoritarian Government

1407 Words6 Pages

In the Authoritarian style of government on the other hand, has many benefits, advantages and like any other type of government, has its own disadvantages and weaknesses. I remember in our previous discussions, we talked about Hobbes’ state of nature which states that a person is naturally selfish and that without a government, there would be total chaos so in result, man agrees to be a part of a government. In this sense, man would agree to be under that government and would agree to be served. It is not assured that there would not be chaos if one joins a government but through this form of government, war would be lessened – and it could be render void. Under this type of government, there are benefits and advantages as well as restrictions. …show more content…

Since the leader has all the power to himself, people then resign their general will to the government. Corruption could be lessened – or better yet, eliminated – since the power is limited when it comes to those who are in a lower position. Also, processing laws are implemented faster and easier unlike the process they do in democracy wherein two or three branches have to discuss it which then takes months and even worse – years. In this type of government, protection of the people is assured wherein laws that would be better for the common good are implemented. The only problem that would be bad for this is if the dictator seated is an extreme leader who would see violence as the best way to bring peace and stability to the country. If the leader does not have the public’s interest on his side, it would be hard to maintain his power and stability of ruling in that certain nation. In times of crisis, this type of government would be a good resort in order to bring back a good government to the country. Since we are facing so many dilemmas now, this is a good type of government for

Show More
Related
476 Words | 2 Pages

How did the constitution guard against tyranny? In May 1787 55 individuals responded to the call for the constitutional convention. They were mostly wealthy and white males. Tyranny is the “accumulation of all powers in the same hands weather one, a few, or many.” This was written by James Madison.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Do you know the real way the U.S constitution guarded against tyranny? Well look no further than right here. First a few facts about the U.S constitution. It was written in 1776, in Philadelphia. The men who wrote it were actually supposed to be revising the articles of confederation( first government of the u.s) but instead they created a whole new constitution.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

In May of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, 55 white men gathered together and created the document we know today as the Constitution. So how is it that a document made made over 200 years ago has managed to overcome the ruling of tyranny? Tyranny is the harsh and absolute power in the hands of an individual. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways: federalism, the separation of powers, the checks and balances system, and large v. small states.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

What if there was a government that has one ruler making many unjust laws. For example, if someone was put into prison for years for only doing one small crime. Or maybe, if a particular religion or race did not have the same rights as others. This took place in the 1700s in an act called tyranny, or rule by a dictator or strong group that results when the ruler(s) have too much power. The existing government of the Articles Of Confederation was too weak, so the plan was to build a new government that prevented tyranny.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Tyranny can come in many different forms. It could only be one person ruling everything, or it could be any group of people. Tyranny means a cruel or oppressive government rule, which is usually started by someone with too much power, and they become corrupt. For this reason, In Philadelphia, 1787, 55 men met up for the Constitutional Convention. This convention aimed to fix all problems with the Articles of Confederation.

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

This is referred to as “Consent of the Government” and plays a big role in determining what the government does. In reality, the people run the country and it would be smart for the government to take full recognition of this. The consent of the government states that the authority of a government should depend on the consent of the people (Document C). When the government chooses not to take this into account, there can sometimes be negative consequences. An example of this would be in 1989 in Tiananmen Square in China.

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

The effect of government delegation in a republic is that the views of the public are “refined and enlarged” to a certain extent by being passed through the citizens whom they elected to govern them. This causes the voice of the public to become more concerned with the public good rather than if the people were ruling themselves as is done in a democracy. However, this action can also backfire if people are elected who do not have the best interest of the people as their first priority and corrupt the system by “betraying the interests of the people” they are representing.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Have You Ever Wondered How The Constitution Guarded Against Tyranny? Have you ever wondered how the constitution guarded against tyranny? This was the main question facing the 55 delegates at the constitutional convention held in philadelphia in 1787. Their job was to “frame a government that was strong enough to serve the needs of the new nation, and yet did not create any kind of tyranny.” , (Background Essay).

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

This means that even though if the dictator wants to do something, they should make sure that they have any reasons that would help the nation. Another ideology, communism is different from absolutism. In communism point of view, there should be no class separation between people, and all people are equal. This is the biggest difference between absolutism and communism, as absolutism suggests that there is an absolute monarch that has been chosen by the god to rule over the state. This directly denies the class concept of communism.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

INTRODUCTION. This assignment focuses mainly on the generally utilized meaning of Totalitarian is "An administration sort that allows no individual flexibility" while, Liberal Democracy is characterized as "A majority rules system in light of the acknowledgment of individual rights and opportunity". Liberal Democracy characteristics it is essential to consider the benefits and demerits of both the types of governments. Majority rules system and Totalitarianism are two ideas that contrast from each other as it were.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

In order to compare and contrast varying types of government within two or more countries, one must have a clear definition of Government and know the purposes it serves. Therefore, I did some research and I have established that Government is a group that exercises dominant power over a nation, state, society or other body of people. Governments are commonly responsible for constructing and implementing laws, handling money, and defending the general population from external threats, and may have other obligations or privileges. All over the world, there are many different types of government within countries. Each kind has its advantages as well as disadvantages regarding the general well-being of its peoples and economy.

Read More
2875 Words | 12 Pages

TUNRADA W. 5504641993 Democracy and Corruption Does democracy produces or reduces corruption and how The question whether democracy produces or reduces corruption has been raised in the past decade observing the mixed evidences occurred across the world. Some democratic states tend to successfully overcome the problem of corruption, some in contrary faces with the more dramatic trouble than before. In the some unsuccessful, discourses were made blaming democracy as a tool for greedy agencies to take advantage from the people of the country.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

There might be less corruption when having a monarchy since if you risk corruption you will serve the consequences and when you know your position lasts a lifetime then you will be aware of the consequences being more cautious while other elected leaders that last a few years might take advantage of it knowing they’re position will only last a couple of years.

Read More
1040 Words | 5 Pages

But, imagine your government falling apart. You then realize that the people and country are affected. Some people do not know that having a good government is mainly for a person living in that country. Good governed countries keep people from doing criminal acts in their towns.

Read More

More about Essay On Authoritarian Government

Related Topics

Open Document