ipl-logo

Democrat Pros And Cons

1109 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cons of the democratic party

The Federalist Papers are some of the most important words that have been written in this history of the United States and were written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison who is responsible for Number 10. Madison focuses Number 10 on factions, their causes, and the result of their existence. Madison beings by stating the capability of the Constitution to control the outcome of factions, such as violence or damage and goes on to state the causes of factions and the solutions to their existence. Madison’s main focus in his paper is factions and their outcomes; a faction is simply a group of people with a common interest, either the “majority or minority of the whole.” Factions originate when people divide themselves over …show more content…

The effect of government delegation in a republic is that the views of the public are “refined and enlarged” to a certain extent by being passed through the citizens whom they elected to govern them. This causes the voice of the public to become more concerned with the public good rather than if the people were ruling themselves as is done in a democracy. However, this action can also backfire if people are elected who do not have the best interest of the people as their first priority and corrupt the system by “betraying the interests of the people” they are representing. There was debate over whether a small or large republic was more favorable for the well being of the people and the evidence is greatly in favor of a large …show more content…

A large republic government prevails over small republic or democracy when controlling factions because there are more people to divide into the factions and therefore there is less unification among the members of the factions. Also, if there is a large republic in which Senators are elected, it is easier to hold the leaders accountable for their actions due to the amount of people because the leaders need to stay on good terms in order to continue receiving votes. In contrast, a small republic allows the citizens to be easily manipulated by factions and leaders. A large republic protects the minority because factions will exist for as long as there is freedom. If there is a common interest or, passion, it will be felt by the all of the people who make up the majority. A “majority” faction is dangerous because it can become so strong that is overpowers the standing national government and results in upheaval and possibly wars such as the Civil War, which is primarily why the early United States should be concerned with

Show More
Related
243 Words | 1 Pages

Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

A faction is best defined as group of people who are associated by a belief or idea. These people are often connected by their concern for the rights of individuals in their community, as well as the future of their society. Madison believed a constitution was necessary for a unified form of government. On the other hand, Madison looked deeper into the democratic form of government and how it would influence the community. By utilizing the principle of majority rule, he thought it would change the factions and enable the government to work together more often.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

Without a large republic not only are you going to have the tyranny of the majority, but you are not going to have a unified country. If we become factionalized to the point where every person represents their own views we are going to be headed towards civil war quickly, and we are going to break up as a nation. By having a large republic and by having all of these voices silenced in their factions we can stay coherent. Madison comes to the conclusion we are not going to have a large enough faction to tear the nation apart, but he is wrong because different opinions will always exist as long as people are free and self-love exist. These factions are inevitably going to tear the nation apart.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

He believes that a large republic would work out well for the States, because a larger government causes less negative impacts on the people, even though all of the people won’t be known, the government won’t be too centralized and only focused on the

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

The final way the constitution guards against tyranny is through big states vs. small states. Big states vs. small states compromise meant that in the House of Representatives, representation was determined by the population of each state whereas the senate representation was equal. In the house “representatives shall be appointed according to population,” and “the U.S. Senate shall be composed of two senators from each state” (Constitution of The United States, 1787). Big states vs. small states is the final way the constitution guards against

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Madison talks about how a small republic has less diversity in thought and choice. Which can be true with smaller groups there is more people so with more people comes more ideas. For example Vatican city which has a very small population and very similar ideas vs America, a country full of many ideas people and political parties. A large republic overall brings out more diversity because of larger numbers the more likelihood of more ideas and cultural influence. Madison also talked about how there is a smaller chance of electing a “bad” candidate.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison starts this most popular of the Federalist papers by explaining that one of the toughest arguments in favor of the constitution is the principal that it establishes a government able to control the disturbance and damage made by factions. James Madison describes factions as groups of individuals in communities who gather around together in unity to promote and protect their special economic interests as well as political opinions. Even though these factions exhibit differences as well as distinguishing marks that separate them from each other, they constantly and continue work towards the public interest which gains support from inhabitants within those factions. And at times might infringe upon the social and communal rights

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

In a large republic, the weaker parts of government are strengthened and the stronger parts of the government are weakened. Due to the fact of the legislative branch inherently being the most powerful, the Constitution imposed this branch being separated to the Senate and the House of Representatives with each separation having different criteria. These branches are also separated from each other because they all have different election methods. The executive branch has its elections differently from that of the legislative branch which includes the Senate and House of Representatives. The judicial branch and the Supreme Court are also

Read More
1745 Words | 7 Pages

This makes it extremely troublesome for one gathering to rule or debilitate the minority bunches. Equity is the reason pf government and common society. It government permits or urges solid gatherings to consolidate together against the powerless, freedom will be lost and rebellion will come about. Also the state of rebellion entices even solid people and gatherings to submit to any structure of government, regardless of how awful, which they trust will secure them as the frail.

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

Accordingly, the 2016 elections proved how increasingly irrelevant the Democratic Party finds itself in large swaths of the country. Likewise, more than a third of all House Democrats come from just three states: California, Massachusetts, and New York. This recently exacerbated problem was relayed by Congressman Ryan on an appearance of NBC’s “Meet the Press”. “It’s time to do something about it, not just talk about it,” he continued. “Because now we’re not even the national party.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

It states, “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” In simpler terms a faction is another term for an interest group, a group of people with a common interest, such as a political

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

A republic differs from a democracy in that every citizen is expected to participate actively in state governance. This paper discusses the circumstances that led to the establishment of the republic, some of the elements that made it democratic, and some of the

Read More

More about Democrat Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document