Essay On Civil Asset Forfeiture

417 Words2 Pages

Many people see civil asset forfeiture as a defective tactic used by the government. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal tool that allows law enforcement officials to seize property that they assert has been involved in certain criminal activity. In Conor Friedersdorfs article, “The Injustice of Civil Asset Forfeiture”, it is clearly stated that he is anti civil asset forfeiture and is looking for a reform in this tactic. Freidersdorf uses the story of a young man named Joseph Rivers for evidence to back up his claims on. Joseph Rivers had a large sum of “on hand cash” confiscated from him, by the the federal government, via civil-asset forfeiture because the money was assumed suspicious of criminal activity. In this article civil-asset forfeiture is depicted as an “execrable tactic”, used by the government, that is constantly victimizing innocent people. In reality, civil-asset forfeiture is a completely credible tool in the law enforcement world and has employed against all manner of criminals and criminal organizations.
One of civil-asset forfeiture greatest attributes is that it …show more content…

Asset forfeiture makes communities safer by enhancing critical law enforcement efforts and supporting regional law enforcement task forces. This tactic keeps criminals at bay by reducing the criminals source of trade. By taking away that sources, whether it be drugs, illegal weapons, etc…, there will be a decrease in the chance of that contraband ending up in the streets of our communities. Civil-asset forfeiture also assists with the drug problem in the United States, by allowing law enforcement agencies to confiscate any illegal drug from the criminal, to prevent it ending up in innocent communities. By keeping drugs and organized crime at bay, civil-asset forfeiture is able to decrease the amount of criminal activity which will allow the youth to be less susceptible to

More about Essay On Civil Asset Forfeiture