Some say that the Constitution guards against tyranny proficiently, and others claim that it does not. Merriam Webster defines tyranny as oppressive power, especially that is exerted by the government. A sure sign of tyranny is a two-tier system of government. When I think of tyranny, I picture one power-hungry despot taking control. However, tyranny can also be demonstrated by a few powerful government figures, or the whole majority! With the knowledge of what a tyranny is, we are now faced with a pressing question about our own government. Does the Constitution guard against tyranny, and if so, how? After the research has been made, I can conclude that the framers of the Constitution did protect against tyranny by creating the Separation …show more content…
For example, in article 1, section 1 of the Constitution, it affirms that the Legislative Branch will be established and split into the House of Representatives and Congress. In addition, article 2, section 1, clause 1 demonstrates the Executive branch (the President and Vice President) being set in place. Furthermore, article 3, section 1 creates the Judicial Branch, consisting of the Supreme Court and inferior courts.These pieces of evidence support my claim by demonstrating the Separation of Powers between the three branches of government. When the power is spread out to different branches, this prevents tyranny because a two- tier system of government is a sure sign of tyranny. The Separation of powers creates a three tier system. Some may dispute this evidence, saying that two of the branches could become more powerful than the third, but this cannot happen because of the Checks and Balances …show more content…
To illustrate, the federal government gets the power to establish relationships with other countries, while the state government is involved in state issues, such as local government. In addition, the Federal government makes immigration laws for foreigners, while the state makes marriage and divorce laws for the state. Finally, the Federal government prints/coins money for the country, while the state government sets up local governments. With the evidence given, it can be concluded that Federalism is a guard against tyranny because it keeps both the federal and state governments from acquiring power over the other. Our government may be a tyranny if there was only a federal government or only a state