Argumentative Paper on Inclusive Design Introduction Accessibility’s aim is to ensure buildings and products bear people with scientifically identified disabilities in mind. However, accessibility has its flaws from the mere fact that is only considered those with clinically accepted disabilities. Therefore, accessibility can never be perfect, because its designs only cater to certain people. On the other hand, inclusive design’s goal is to ensure buildings and products work for all people, while being mindful of those with a recognized disability. This may sound like a sight different, but in principle and practice, the difference is profound. Accessibility is framed around the concept of disabled versus able-bodied. Unfortunately, this causes …show more content…
The fact remains, a mass solution will never work well, conversely, specialized or separate solution will also not work due not only the technical difficulty to achieve this, but also the high cost to do so. Instead, inclusive design should start with product design, and focus on how to maximize a particular design through targeting appropriate markets for inclusiveness. This may indeed be a challenge, however personalized, adaptable or flexible designs and configurations should be considered. It is easy to stand in opposition when not personally facing these challenge, however, when seen through the eyes or those facing these challenges, this should be motivation enough to consider inclusive design. Moreover, what may be appropriate for an airport or shopping centers where the greatest diversity exists, may not be appropriate for a small business with a limited clientele. Nevertheless, not only is specialized design not sustainable, but it also does not serve the needs of the individual, therefore, inclusive design is not only required, but should be