Over the past 120 years, inequality in Australia has become more recognised and prevalent in society with many Australians struggling to support themselves based on their income and wealth. This is frequently connected to the unfair allocation of assets, social standing, legal rights, and opportunities based on the quantifiable phenomena of inequality. The practice of grouping people into divisions in society based on both actual and perceived distinctions in social and economic standing is known as class, and it is a great illustration of income and wealth inequality in Australia. Wealth has not been distributed according to how hard an individual works as income and wealth distribution has increased inequality over the past 120 years despite …show more content…
According to Perry (2018), there are three categories of chances, experiences, and results may be used to analyse educational inequality. These categories illustrate how students with higher social standing are more favoured than those with lower social standing. This is common; pupils who don't have access to teachers who are competent and experienced are more likely to have poorer educational achievements than those who do (Perry, 2018). By looking into the notable performance discrepancy between the top and bottom students, this is further investigated. By comprehending how persons with low socioeconomic backgrounds and Indigenous ancestry are associated with educational inequity and low achievement (Douglas et al., 2014). According to Douglas et al. (2014), this is because Australians with a postgraduate degree earn twice as much as those with a Year 11 or lower education. This is especially true for people who are less fortunate economically and have lower incomes and wealth. Due to greater networking, it is believed that those who were born into higher levels of wealth are given more employment possibilities, increasing inequality in Australian society (Douglas et al., 2014). This relates to the reality that inequality in …show more content…
A person's ability to support themselves financially is crucial in daily life since it serves as both a key social indicator and a fundamental need for survival (Markham & Biddle, 2016). This is especially common among Indigenous Australian households because, in comparison to non-Indigenous households, individuals with lower incomes spend a larger percentage of their incomes on basics of life (Markham & Biddle, 2016). The employment rates of Indigenous Australians are significantly lower than those of non-Indigenous Australians, which provides further evidence of how income disparity links to race (Borland & Coelli, 2016). Due to their poorer socioeconomic level and worse health, Indigenous Australians live in places with fewer work prospects and have lower educational attainment (Borland & Coelli, 2016). Further evaluation of this occurs in the employment market, where Indigenous Australians do poorer than non-Indigenous Australians for a variety of reasons, resulting in a wider wage disparity in society (Birch & Marshall, 2017). Compared to 76.4 percent of non-Indigenous Australians, it was shown that just 55.9 percent of Indigenous Australians participate in the labour market (Birch & Marshall, 2017). The combination of factors showed that Indigenous Australians