ipl-logo

Essay On Kansas Vs Hendricks

756 Words4 Pages

Kansas v. Hendricks is a Case that went through Kansas Supreme Court's 1n 1997. The case involved Hendricks a sex offender. In a narrative I will be talking about the case. I will give facts, issues, and court holdings about the case.
The facts of the case. Leroy Hendricks and Tim Quinn had histories of molesting kids. Hendricks was convicted in November 1984 for taking indecent liberties with two thrteen year old boys.Hendricks had gotten a plea deal, So he plead guilty. Hendricks was sentence 5 to 20 years, but he only served 10 years in prison.They both had served most of their sentence, and they was ready for release. Hendricks was scheduled to be released to a halfway house in September of 1994.The State of Kansas filed a petition to …show more content…

The Act said a small group of predators exist who do not have a mental disease or defect that rendered the offender appropriately for involuntary treatment. Short term treatment is provided for person with mental disability Hendricks and Quinn Challenged the Kansas Courts. The men testified own their behalf, and they both agreed with the psychologist. They both said they suffered from pediophilla and they still have thes sexual desires.The jury decide they were sexual predators. The courts decided to civilly commit Hendricks because of his mental abnormality, but they did not criminal commit them. Hendricks appeal the decision claiming the state was unconstitutional using ex post facto and double jeopardy laws. The State Supreme of Kansas said nothing about Hendricks claim of double jeopardy and ex post facto, but they found that the act was invalid because metal abnormality did …show more content…

In a 5 to 4 decision the courts ruled against Hendricks. The Supreme Courts agreed with the act the definition of mental abnormal is a condition that affects the emotions, and this predispose the person to commit sexual violent acts. This makes the person a menace to society affecting the safety and health of others. Also, the courts said the act was not a criminal proceeding, so double jeopardy and ex post facto is not a factor. Involuntary confinement was not a form of punishment, But The supreme court if agreed that the act made by Kansas would limited offenders eligible for confinements to those that can not control their dangerous situations. The court ruled that it does not violate a person's rights in trying to confine them to deter them from antisocial behavior. Antisocial behavior lack consideration for others well being. The courts said that the pedphillas would more than likely repeat again and that was the reason for involuntary

Show More
Related

Essay On State Vs Mayfield Trial

853 Words | 4 Pages

State vs. Mayfield Trial On December 27th, 1989, State Police Officer Edward Mayfield pulled over Donna Nugent to a shady area where he strangled her and threw her body off of a bridge. We don’t know why he pulled her over. He then proceeded to strangle her with a rope. I believe State Police Officer Edward Mayfield is guilty of murder in the first degree because he had and hid the murder weapon, pulling over specifically blonde women, and he changed the activity log.

Read More

Steven Vail Case

731 Words | 3 Pages

All of his time was accounted from his alibi, and he had witnesses to vouch. He was sentenced to 32 years in prison without a chance for parole, never admitting guilt because he did not commit the crime. Meanwhile Gregory Allen was freely out in Wisconsin, violently raping and assaulting women. At the time of his last rape in 1995, he was 57 years old. Steven and his wife Lori divorced while he was in prison.

Read More

Palko V. Connecticut Supreme Court Case Study

628 Words | 3 Pages

Today marks the 80th anniversary of the devastating Supreme Court case of Palko v. Connecticut[1] in which the Supreme Court held that the 5th amendment right against Double Jeopardy did not apply to state courts. While Palko[2] was eventually overturned by the landmark case of Benton v. Maryland[3], Palko stood for 32 years as an impediment to peoples Constitutional rights. The Case[4] The case behind Palko perhaps explains the Courts dim view. Late one evening in 1935, Frank Palko[5] broke into a music store in Fairfield County Connecticut[6] , stole a phonograph and fled the scene on foot. Mr. Palko was quickly cornered by a police officer who he shot and killed.

Read More

Texas Vs Johnson Case Summary

640 Words | 3 Pages

The Texas versus Johnson case is a case where the state of Texas is arguing that Johnson should be charged and reconvicted. Johnson was a criminal, and he was wrong in his actions. Texas understands that, and they are going to argue the side of justice. Johnson should’ve turned himself over while he had the chance, but he decided to fight his side of the case. He has those rights.

Read More

R. V. Schoenborn Case Study

1344 Words | 6 Pages

There is also an inclination to believe that if he had not suffered from this state, then the offence would not have been committed, specially not in the barbaric way it was done. Thus, it cannot be concluded that the accused willfully preformed the act, nor that the mens rea and the actus reus coincided while he was not in a psychotic state. (Roach, 113) Related to this finding is another element that supports the verdict of the Honorable Judge, which is the Principle of Fundamental Justice that states that no one should be “punished for morally involuntary actions.” (Roach, 82) A person who successfully raises the mental disorder defence is considered to be morally innocent of the act because they were not acting freely, in this case, free from psychotic ideations.

Read More

Texas Vs Johnson Pros And Cons

1872 Words | 8 Pages

Texas v. Johnson (1989) centers around the issue of whether burning the American flag should be considered expressive conduct that is protected by the First Amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted of the desecration of a venerated object when he burned a flag outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in protest of President Ronald Reagan's policies. There was a Texas statute in place which prohibited the intentional desecration of a venerated object, considered to be public monuments, places of worship or burial, and state or national flags.

Read More

Texas Vs. Johnson Majority Opinion By Barbara Jordan And Jim Wright

813 Words | 4 Pages

Texas’ government pushed for his punishment, but Johnson appealed against the decision (Beers et. al, 2016, 15). Finally, Supreme Court’s

Read More

Houston Vs Lamar Essay

612 Words | 3 Pages

Cierra Moreno Government 2306 Extra Credit A difference in policy Both Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar are known as former president’s of the Republic of Texas. They share many similarities, but mostly differ in policy towards Native American’s. For example, many of their differences have nothing to do with their views but of the way they act a certain way.

Read More

Roper V. Simmons Essay

872 Words | 4 Pages

In Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.

Read More

Stanford Vs Kentucky Essay

772 Words | 4 Pages

The United States Supreme Court case Stanford vs. Kentucky was a national debate that permitted the hypocrisy of the death penalty, which at the time stated that all offenders who were of the age sixteen years or older at the time of their crime would receive the punishment of execution. The case took place on the day of March 27, 1989, and was officially decided on June 26, 1989. The argument began when Kevin Stanford, who was seventeen years old at the time, shot and killed twenty year old Barbel Poore on January 7, 1981. Stanford’s was trialed as an adult and was convicted of murder, first-degree robbery, and first-degree sodomy, and as a result received 45 years in prison as a punishment. Stanford declared that “he has the constitutional

Read More

How Did Dorothea Dix Treat Women In Jail

754 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine being trapped in a damp, dark, cage as a form of punishment for something that seems completely out of your grasp. Prisons were understaffed and as barbaric as it gets the people charged with crimes were whipped. The primary cause for their creation was to keep the crooks from harming any people right? Everyone in solitary confinement is treated the same way but not everyone came for the same reason. In fact, mentally ill people were considered to be harsh maniacs which did not receive treatment for a long time.

Read More

Bleeding Kansas Essay

280 Words | 2 Pages

“Bleeding Kansas” involved Northern and Southern settlers, Border Ruffians, and John Brown and it affected Kansas. Bleeding Kansas was a sequence of violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces to decide whether Kansas should be a free or slave state. Northerners often sided towards the belief of anti-slavery. Tempers flared in Kansas over impending decision of it being admitted as a free or slave state; a large population of Northerners entered Kansas to sway the decision. This led to brutal conflict between people who believed in continuing slavery in the new territories.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens

548 Words | 3 Pages

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.

Read More

Estelle V. Gamble Case Study

375 Words | 2 Pages

In that case, the Supreme Court held that prison staff (whether doctors or officers or any others) violated the Eighth Amendment if they were deliberately indifferent to the serious medical needs of prisoners.

Read More

Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act

2076 Words | 9 Pages

1. Topic 1 The Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act was established like in many other states shortly after the 1994 rape and murder of Megan Kanka, a seven-year-old from New Jersey. Within the registry offenders are separated into two separate categories, non-aggravated offenders and aggravated offenders solely based off of the gravity of the offense(s) committed. AS 12.63.010.

Read More

More about Essay On Kansas Vs Hendricks

Related Topics

Open Document