Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Southern colonys
When Brown was 55 he moved with his sons to Kansas territory after the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 overrode the Missouri Compromise, which resulted in the strict ban of slavery above a certain latitude. This was a huge deal to both pro-slavery and anti-slavery fighters for before this act was passed the United States only consisted of twenty-two states which were divided among the two groups of fighters. Winning this territory for slavery, or for those against it, could really make a statement. During the settling of Kansas the events of violent acts that occurred during the period (1855) is referred to as “Bleeding Kansas”. Violence pursued throughout the year 1855.
One key issue between the two parts of the country was whether or not slavery would expand westward to any newly acquired territories. This had been an issue for a long time and ultimately after failing to reach a compromise the country fell back on popular sovereignty or letting people in the new territories decide whether or not they wanted slaver. This however provided no solution as can be seen in the incident “Bleeding Kansas”. This was a series of violent acts in Kansas between those who were for and against slaver.
John Brown was involved in the Pottawatomie massacre during the vents of “Bleeding Kansas.” Brown and his sons had traveled to Kansas and attempt to make Kansas a free state, when the massacre occurred. The position of Kansas as either a free or slave state was dependent upon the people living in it, because this would be decided by popular sovereignty. The Pottawatomie massacre led
DBQ: Political Disputes 1820-1860 For forty-four years, the United States of America was a thriving country. We had won our independence from Great Britain and we had started to create a country that would change the world. Yet, in the year 1860, a joined country and political agreement between all states seemed utterly impossible. People fought with each other so deeply about slavery, the country was divided between slave and free states. By the time of 1820 through 1860, political disagreement grew so large, there had been only one answer.
WE belive that when the vote to decide the outcome of Kansas is taken, there will be a flood of people from boardering states comeing in Many people from the neighboring slave state Missouri could possibly come in. This could sway the vote from the real residents of Kansas. They could also come in and try to pressure the true residents of Kansas with violence(2). Imagine going to the polling place and having a gun held to your head, this would make you want to change your vote to the opinion of the gun man. Tensions between the north and the south are already high, popular sovergnty could be the last straw before something worse happens between the north and the south.
Republicans from the North such as Abraham Lincoln were against the spread of slavery, and so Sen. Stephen Douglas made a symbolic move against the North, the territories which would have been unlikely candidates for slave-holding states were stormed by slaveholders from Missouri, and brief fighting broke out in Kansas. The North was struck again with the effect of the Dred Scott v. Stanford case, which ruled that slavery could not be banned in the United States. This was a setback to anti-slavery Northerners, who though fighting to keep slavery out of their states, were told that slavery must be allowed universally. Dred Scott v. Stanford ensured that the Northerners felt their values were being attacked, and began to rise defensively as they began to sense compromise would not work in their
Bleeding Kansas led to many tragic things like over 60 deaths, but it was also an important part of American history. During Bleeding Kansas there were many people fighting for what the believed in. Back during the time when Bleeding Kansas took place many people believed slavery was right and should be legal and some people disagreed completely. Now most people believe slavery is wrong is slavery is illegal in
This contributed to the Civil War. The result of the Kansas/Nebraska Act was Bleeding Kansas. The violence displayed that people were willing to go to complete extremes for their sides, even killing each other so that their way of life would have more power. Bleeding Kansas showed the divide between the regions because it was the first bloodshed in this conflict. Next was the Dred Scott Case where Roger Tany stated that black people were property, and property was property everywhere, meaning there were no free states.
DBQ #3: Civil War and Reconstruction In the decade preceding the Civil War, tensions between the North and the South intensified. The Compromise of 1850, which freed California, implemented a more rigorous version of the Fugitive Slave Act, and made several other points was the last true attempt to peaceably resolve the tensions revolving around slavery. Starting in about 1854, the South began to accuse the North of refusing to comply with the Fugitive Slave Act, and at one point the Act was ruled unconstitutional by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 also contributed greatly towards the Civil War, as it triggered what later would become known as “Bleeding Kansas”.
The men doing so were Franklin Pierce, Senator Stephen A. Douglass, James Buchanan, and senator Lewis Cass, they were the main contributors to the problems in the Union. Created in 1856 Straightforward image An outbreak of conflict had emerged resulting from the passage of the Kansas Nebraska Act under the principle of popular sovereignty but the main issue of the doctrine was the faith of the outcome. In Kansas free-soilers prompted to control the government. John Brown a more violent abolitionist fought a war with pro-slavery forces.
It also raised tensions between the North and the South and created a violent atmosphere in Kansas. Pro-slavery and antislavery forces formed in Kansas when the vote for slavery was taking place. Those forces transformed Kansas into a state divided by two separate governments. Kansas had its own civil war that was a strong indication for a future war over slavery throughout the whole country. Next was the Dred
The first instance of violence came when abolitionist newcomers, including the infamous New England Emigrant Aid Company, in Kentucky carried rifles nicknamed “Beecher’s Bibles” chanting comments like “Ho for Kansas” out to make both new territories free states. Southerners, at the time of the newcomers arrival, had thought there was an unspoken understanding that Kansas would become a slave state and Nebraska a free state raising new feelings of betrayal. Bullets between the two disagreeing groups began to be shot. The turning point of Bleeding Kansas, however, came in 1856 when proslavery raiders burned and shot up a free-soil town called Lawrence. These violent explosions largely contributed to the effects of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of
As expected these people did not get along together and the tension led to fighting between antislavery “Jayhawks” and proslavery Missouri “Ruffians” known as “Bleeding Kansas” (Lecture). The sacking of free-state settlements in Kansas included forced evacuation of the town of Leavenworth and the burning of the small city of Lawrence (Napier, 28). All of these debates over slavery during 19th century, whether in Missouri, Texas, or Kansas were the result of westward expansion by the United States and were showing that compromise was becoming harder and harder and that violence was bound to erupt over the idea of slavery. This violence culminated into the Civil War which saw the debate over slavery ended with America’s bloodiest conflict. While it is undoubted that the main cause of the Civil War was slavery, the expansion westward brought the question of slavery’s expansion to a nation debate and can be seen as a dramatic shifter in the course of American
Lawrence, Kansas was looted and burned by pro-slavery settlers. In response, John Brown and his anti-slavery followers captured and brutally hacked five pro-slavery men to death. Again, the pro-slavery settlers won and anti-slavery settlers charged them with fraud a second time. At the end of the third election, anti-slavery settlers outnumbered the pro-slavery settlers and Kansas was admitted to the Union as a free state.
One of whom was John Brown, an abolitionist who led several men to kill proslavery settlers in Laurence, Kansas in 1856. The brutality and severe deaths of this massacre became known as “Bleeding Kansas” (Lapansky-Werner336). Three years later, Brown attempted to lead a slave revolt in Harper’s Ferry. Although he suspected that this would inspire many slaves, his revolt was a failure due to the lack of abolitionists willing to fight beside him. Despite the fact that Brown’s life ended in execution, he did influence others that agreed with the fact that slavery would not come to an end “without very much bloodshed” (Lapansky-Werner344-345).