ipl-logo

Kansas Nebraska Act Research Paper

618 Words3 Pages

I am a senator representing the state of New Hampshire in regards to the debate of the Kansas-Nebraska act. The state of New Hampshire believes that the Kansas Nebraska Act shall not be ratified as presented to the senate on this day, 30 May , 1854. Many years ago this country put the Missouri Compromise into effect. That has been the governing decider as to whether a state was free or not when it applied for statehood. Why does this suddenly not matter any longer? There are many reasons as to why we do not support the idea of popular sovergnty. One of the biggest reasons was getting a real vote that was true to the residents of Kansas. Another reason is because we do not choose to support slavery, as we are a free state. The biggest reason that we in the state of New Hampshire belive popular …show more content…

WE belive that when the vote to decide the outcome of Kansas is taken, there will be a flood of people from boardering states comeing in Many people from the neighboring slave state Missouri could possibly come in. This could sway the vote from the real residents of Kansas. They could also come in and try to pressure the true residents of Kansas with violence(2). Imagine going to the polling place and having a gun held to your head, this would make you want to change your vote to the opinion of the gun man. Tensions between the north and the south are already high, popular sovergnty could be the last straw before something worse happens between the north and the south. We belive that putting popular sovergnty into effect could possibly lead to bloody fighting. Another reson popular sovergnty is a bad idea in the state of Kansas is because is repeals the Missouri compromise(3). The Missouri compromise has set the precident for the decision of slave states for the past 30 years.What will happen wen that no longer applies? Will we have this disagreement again down the road? When something isn’t broken, why should you

Show More
Related
154 Words | 1 Pages

Last month, we learned the Missouri Compromise, the Monroe Doctrine and American System. These three events were important for me to review against, I deem. The Missouri Compromise was worked out in 1820. The Congress had a serious problem about balance. Missouri became one thing that could break this balance.

Read More
1891 Words | 8 Pages

Congress just did not have the power that they were meant to have. Congress simply could not establish anything as they simply did not have the authority to enact such things. But after the Missouri compromise congress saw themselves get a large boost in their authority to enact laws and acts upon states. You can see the increase in their power in the events that took place after the compromise. Congress was able to take authority in admitting california as a free state, congress also was able to deal with the Kansas Nebraska act in the way that they wished to do it.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was created to link the east and west coasts of America together to form the transcontinental railroad. America had growing interests in trading with Asian countries, and this railroad was the key. Throughout the 1850s America purchased over $10 million worth of land to build said railroad. After the Kansas-Nebraska act passed, Kansas became the center of attention. Due to building tension between the abolitionists and the pro-slavery parties Kansas turned into a very violent place.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

We cannot claim that this was a bad decision for if one had gotten even one state more, the other would have had a reason to go to war. The other decision that took place, and which had a direct effect on the outcome of events in the period, was the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that once again preserved the balance

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

The Missouri Compromise did not extend this far west; the issue over slave and free states quickly arose and drove tensions between the North and South to an all time high. Thus, Stephen A Douglas, a Northern Democrat from Illinois advocated for the idea of popular sovereignty. This was a major shift in the process by which states were to become slave or free states-radical even. The right for a state to be a free or slave state would be determined by a state legislature. This not only upset the crucial balance, but created the “Bleeding Kansas”

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Prior to the events of Bleeding Kansas that begun in 1854, the United States followed a strict policy of compromise in regards to it’s political decisions. Being a relatively newly founded country a great deal of care was given towards pleasing the citizens of the United States, through compromise, in order to maintain a stable society. This is specifically evident in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Compromise of 1850. These events helped to maintain the stability of American society for a time. However, as the nation developed further there became apparent divides on many matters, but mainly over slavery.

Read More
250 Words | 1 Pages

Imagine a being in line to vote for non-slavery in the newly established state, Kansas, right before the voting house became overfilled with southern voters voting on slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed the people of the Kansas and the Nebraska Territories to vote on whether the state is a non-slave or a slave state. The Kansas Nebraska act should have never happened because it overturned the Missouri compromise, violence broke out in kansas, and southern voters illegally voted in the kansas voting. One of the main reason why the Kansas-Nebraska act should have never happened is because it overturned the Missouri Compromise which was made official in 1820. For example, “To win southern support, Douglas proposed that slavery in the new

Read More
135 Words | 1 Pages

Esmeralda, great post! The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that ordered "famous sovereignty"– enabling pioneers of a domain to choose whether subjugation would be permitted inside another state's fringes. Proposed by Stephen A. Douglas– Abraham Lincoln's rival in the powerful Lincoln-Douglas debates– the bill toppled the Missouri Compromise's utilization of scope as the limit amongst slave and free an area. The contentions that emerged between master bondage and abolitionist subjection pioneers in the fallout of the demonstration's section prompted the time of brutality known as Bleeding Kansas and helped made ready for the American Civil War (1861-65). This 1854 bill to sort out western domains turned out to be a piece of the political

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

Before the events of Bleeding Kansas happened, Congress had to pass the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The second draft of the act championed by Stephen Douglas passed because it allowed popular sovereignty to decide if slavery would be permitted in the new territories. When understanding the events of Bleeding Kansas, it is best to follow the four distinct constitutions drawn up by the settlers. The first attempt at a constitution came from free-staters in Topeka. While the Topeka constitution prohibited slavery, it “clearly compromised the varied attitudes on race…” (75).

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, after the Kansas Nebraska Act was passed, wealthy people wanted to take advantage and build a transcontinental railroad that run through Kansas, However, in order to build the railroad they need slaves. The Supreme Court in case Dred Scoot v Sandford declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, letting others states in the west to be either a free state or a

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state or a free state, which threatened to upset the balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress orchestrated a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas. The north’s reaction towards the MIssouri Compromise was that they condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Several compromises were made over the issue of slavery between the Three-Fifths Compromise in the Constitution and the Civil War. Most of these compromises were made in the hope of avoiding a civil war between the North and the South, but they just prolonged the inevitable battle. The Missouri Compromise was one of the first federal laws that focused solely on slavery, including the balance of slave and free states in the federal government. When Missouri applied for statehood in 1817, there was a balance in the Senate of 11 slave states and 11 free states. Debate broke out in Congress, owing to the fact that if Missouri was added as a free state or slave state, it would tip the balance towards that side with two more votes in the Senate.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

The South did not like the Missouri Compromise, though. They did not like it due to the fact that Congress would now have the power to make or change any rules dealing with slavery if they felt that they needed to (Forbes

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Why break something that does not need

Read More

More about Kansas Nebraska Act Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document