I am a senator representing the state of New Hampshire in regards to the debate of the Kansas-Nebraska act. The state of New Hampshire believes that the Kansas Nebraska Act shall not be ratified as presented to the senate on this day, 30 May , 1854. Many years ago this country put the Missouri Compromise into effect. That has been the governing decider as to whether a state was free or not when it applied for statehood. Why does this suddenly not matter any longer? There are many reasons as to why we do not support the idea of popular sovergnty. One of the biggest reasons was getting a real vote that was true to the residents of Kansas. Another reason is because we do not choose to support slavery, as we are a free state. The biggest reason that we in the state of New Hampshire belive popular …show more content…
WE belive that when the vote to decide the outcome of Kansas is taken, there will be a flood of people from boardering states comeing in Many people from the neighboring slave state Missouri could possibly come in. This could sway the vote from the real residents of Kansas. They could also come in and try to pressure the true residents of Kansas with violence(2). Imagine going to the polling place and having a gun held to your head, this would make you want to change your vote to the opinion of the gun man. Tensions between the north and the south are already high, popular sovergnty could be the last straw before something worse happens between the north and the south. We belive that putting popular sovergnty into effect could possibly lead to bloody fighting. Another reson popular sovergnty is a bad idea in the state of Kansas is because is repeals the Missouri compromise(3). The Missouri compromise has set the precident for the decision of slave states for the past 30 years.What will happen wen that no longer applies? Will we have this disagreement again down the road? When something isn’t broken, why should you