Essay On Presidential Nominating Conventions

1433 Words6 Pages

Presidential nominating conventions take place in the summer of an election year. The main task is to select the party’s presidential nominee, even that in all recent contests one candidate has already emerged from the nomination process with a clear majority of delegates and wins the nomination on the first ballot.

To get the nomination, a candidate needs the support of a majority of the delegates, and if no candidate receives a majority after the first round of voting at the convention, the voting has to continue until someone does. After the delegates nominate a presidential candidate, he chooses a vice-presidential nominee, who has to be ratified by the delegates. The normal performance of the nominations used to have a pattern, in which there is a frontrunner that is leader in the early public opinion polls and has raised a large amount of money, and goes on to win the nomination. In a less common scenario, the leader falters and is replaced by another candidate, and in third place it could happen that in the political party, there is no clear frontrunner but in fact, a number of more contenders vying for the nomination. In another variant, it happens that two strong candidates may battle it out over the entire course of the presidential primaries and caucuses.

The final purpose of a convention is to attract public attention, to make it a …show more content…

They also have experience in campaigning and a prior experience in governing and being good at choosing a proper presidential candidate. Governors in the last elections were most successful than senators because senators often have a lengthy voting record that may be turned against them, creating long lists with a lot of mediocre candidates, while governors focus their interest in candidacies more