ipl-logo

Differences Between Texas And The Plural Executive

668 Words3 Pages

During the Constitution of the Reconstruction in 1869, Texas had its first governor named Edmund Jackson Davis. He was able to manipulate laws and the government, in a way that gave him a great amount of power. His time in office led to the creation of a law that limited governors to only a four-year term. The plural executive was later implemented in the Constitution of 1876, within article IV section 1 you can find where it explains the plural executive, hopes of this never happening again. The plural executive was developed to prevent an individual from having too much power within the government. The plural executive distributes powers among different officials. In Texas these officials are the governor Rick Perry is the current governor, …show more content…

Yet, they are different, even though the powers are divided in both they are set up differently. For example, in the executive branch of the United States the power is mostly given to the president, currently that person is Barack Obama. In the plural executive there is people added to evade giving too much power to the governor. This certainly shows how the amount of power has been handed out differently. One thing that is different between the governor of Texas and the president is their veto power. While the president can veto an entire bill the governor only has the power to veto a part of the bill. Another thing is that the governor cannot form cabinet and the president can. Yet governors still play an important role after all the restrictions. “But despite having fewer resources and more limitations, modern governors can be successful in implementing their priorities and policies.” (Texas Politics- The Executive Branch) On the other hand the executive branch is made up of several individuals just like the Texas plural executive; this was done to serve the same purpose of not letting an individual gain to much

Open Document