ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast California's Model Compared To The Federal Government

1185 Words5 Pages

The United States uses many different governance styles. California’s style has much diversity and a very large size. The size has led California to a more complex system. The California government has had many issues in their healthcare, transportation etc. This leads to California's model being more complex than any other state. California’s model is different from the federal model in many ways. The progressives during their time in power transformed California’s political landscape. I will offer 6 significant differences between California’s model compared to the federal model and discuss the progressive's goals. I will also examine the 4th branch of government in this essay.

California's size and scope is much larger, and complex compared …show more content…

California’s power is divided across multiple officials that were voted for and the governor is the head of the executive branch. California’s style has many more roles than the federal government has. The federal government models' power is more focused on the president. Although the vice president and other agencies have power as well. They usually report to the president as he makes the bigger decisions. In California it is much more complicated since their power is much more spread throughout multiple individuals. California’s model of plural executives has more freedom than the federal government since the president carries most of the power although his decisions must also pass congress, but it is much simpler than California's …show more content…

They wanted the government to be held accountable for their actions and they promoted social welfare. They promoted direct democracy to the people to bring them power and used many different techniques like advocating for initiatives and recalls which gave citizens the power to bring in ideas for new laws and gave them voting power. The progressives aimed for as much power as possible and brought power to the people another way by promoting government reforms. They created agencies to protect the people while they were pushing for reforms in the political

Show More
Related

How California Became Unforgivable Summary

709 Words | 3 Pages

In the article, “How California Became Unforgivable” by Jerry Roberts and Phil Trounstine, they basically describe six key factors that made California impossible to govern. They claim that California wields a "power with the damaged machinery of a patchwork government system that lacks accountability, encourages stalemate and drifts but cannot be steered." Basically, elected representatives in California have no authority, yet still hold responsibility. The six factors mentioned earlier include Proposition 13, budget initiatives, gerrymandering, term limits, boom or bust taxation, and the two-thirds vote. But how do these factors make California impossible to govern?

Read More

Case 4.1 California Government In Crisis

517 Words | 3 Pages

First, the population is changing overtime, which is causing the demand of new schools, buildings, and transportations. These feature projects requires a lot funds, which the government doesn’t have. Secondly, Most of the budget in California comes from income taxes, which are used to pay the interest debt leaving the state with nothing. Thirdly, we have the interest groups that are more engaged into political than us the people. We should get involve more in public policies and affairs that will affect us.

Read More

California Rising The Life And Times Of Pat Brown Summary

1065 Words | 5 Pages

Rarick states that this is the turning point of what the American experience is, New York being the old and California being the new. Through the story of the life and times of Pat Brown we witness an extraordinary period that changed the entire country’s view of itself and its most famous state. Pat Brown was the perfect person to serve as California governor (1959-1965) during a period of both booming population and economic growth. Brown served as the city’s district attorney in San Francisco and the state’s attorney general before being elected governor. Brown was a natural politician.

Read More

Similarities Between California And Us Constitution

279 Words | 2 Pages

The California and United States Constitution are similar and different in many ways, an example that manifests this is in California’s constitution where the Governor has the power to “line veto” a bill, meaning that he has the power to address some parts of a bill with still the availability of ignoring certain fragments. While in the United States, the president can “pocket veto” a law but cannot pick which sections he’d wish to keep or get rid of. However if he does not act within ten days of receiving the bill it can become a law without the presidential signature. Some similarities that reside between the two can be found in article three of the California Constitution, which divides the state government into three branches Legislative,

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between The Constitutions Of California And Oregon

158 Words | 1 Pages

1. The US Constitution, along with the Constitutions of both California and Oregon seem to be arranged in similar fashion. All contain a preamble followed by Articles and Sections, but the similarities between them seemingly end here. In the Constitutions of both California and Oregon, the Bill of Rights can be found within Article I. Whereas in our Us Constitution the Bill of Rights is not seen until the first 10 Amendments have been added presumably nearly two years after. It is evident that while writing the US Constitution, our forefathers were most concerned with the presumption of power by the government.

Read More

Ap Human Geography Chapter 4 Essay

671 Words | 3 Pages

1- The State of California currently has 53 Representatives, in the U.S House. 2- The State of California have 39 democrats and 14 republicans in the house of representative. 3- The current Governor of the State of California is Governor Jerry Brown, his political party is the Democratic Party.

Read More

Examples Of How The Constitution Blocks Tyranny

1041 Words | 5 Pages

“James Madison’s idea of the division of power between central and state governments is known as federalism.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788) The state governments have the power to make local decisions such as establishing schools, passing marriage and divorce laws, and to hold elections. Whereas the central government has the power to make decisions that affect the country such as, to provide an army and navy, set up post offices, and regulate trade. As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”

Read More

Differences Between Texas And The Plural Executive

668 Words | 3 Pages

Yet, they are different, even though the powers are divided in both they are set up differently. For example, in the executive branch of the United States the power is mostly given to the president, currently that person is Barack Obama. In the plural executive there is people added to evade giving too much power to the governor. This certainly shows how the amount of power has been handed out differently. One thing that is different between the governor of Texas and the president is their veto power.

Read More

Essay On Nevada Government

851 Words | 4 Pages

Nevadan Government, while bound by federal policy, is different in many ways. The definitions and powers of branches of government as well as amendment processes, in their differences to federal equals, define much of Nevadan politics and state governance. Most of the important differences either protect voters through more stringent legislative requirements or give more democratic power to the majority through the elective and legislative process. The Nevada Constitution, adopted in 1864, is much longer and more in depth than the US Constitution ratified 76 years before.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Constitution And Texas Constitution

1401 Words | 6 Pages

The President has the concentrated power of the executive along with a host of other powers that make the US executive branch fairly strong. The Texas constitution, when chartered, was designed to do the exact opposite so it created what is called a plural executive. This takes executive power and spreads it across multiple people stopping one person or elected office from having too much power or consolidated power. It essentially ensured the governor, unlike the president, was weak. One major difference with the executive office, one I particularly like about Texas, is how each chief executive vetoes bills.

Read More

What Are The Conditions That Led To The Calling Of The Convention In 1849

920 Words | 4 Pages

In 1849, California was a territory of the United States, and its leaders were faced with the daunting task of drafting a state constitution that would guide its government once it was granted statehood. This led to the calling of the constitutional convention in Monterey, where delegates from across the territory came together to draft a new constitution. This essay will explore the conditions that led to the calling of the convention, examine the backgrounds of the delegates, look at the major issues at the convention and how they were resolved, and discuss the important characteristics of the government created by the 1849 convention. There were many factors present when the Monterey constitutional conference was called in 1849. California saw a population explosion as a result of the huge influx of people that followed the finding of gold there in 1848.

Read More

The Three Branches Of Government In The United States

1052 Words | 5 Pages

There are state levels and federal levels of the executive branch, at state level the executive branch includes governors and also their staff and at the federal level the executive branch includes the President, the vice President, staffs of appointed advisors and a few other departments and agencies that may seem familiar such as the central intelligence agency and the federal bureau of investigation even the post office. The executive branch does many things, such as appointing federal judges and they deal in the nations domestic and foreign policies. Checks and balances are in place to limit the power of the executive branch. The limitations and accountability within the executive branch are through electorate and congress by both impeachment and over ride of executive

Read More

Redistricting In California

713 Words | 3 Pages

Thousands of bills pass in the California legislature every year. Just later is responsible for tackling the state 's problems big and small. The legislature does not act in policymaking vacuum rather him a share power with the other branches of government. 40% approved with the legislate tiff branch and 44% disapprove of the legislative branch in a survey taken in 2013. Structurally numerically much for today 's state legislature parallels its original design intent.

Read More

How Did Federalist 51 Impact Today's Government

543 Words | 3 Pages

Not only is there a federal government, but there are also state and local governments. Furthermore, there are forms of government that function on a higher basis than local governments, but on a lower basis than state governments. Although the federal government has overall control on how the country functions, the other forms of government have a considerable impact on the laws of each area. All states have varying laws that lie along the same lines. For instance, the age to get a Driver’s license is not the same from state to state, but they are around the same age.

Read More

Argumentative Essay Federalism

944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast California's Model Compared To The Federal Government

Related Topics

Open Document