In Chapter 9 of the book “Major Problems in California History” the authors use the key term “Hollywood” which is known as the “film colony” where movie stars lived and played. The author uses the term “Hollywood” as life in a movie by stating, “The existence of “Hollywood” as a residential community proved that the kind of life depicted on the silver screen could be found in reality.” Also, the author uses the key term “Hollywood” as a glamorous version of the American Dream by stating, “Ordinary people became acquainted with the movie stars’ opulent lifestyle through stories and photographs in fan magazines. Another way the key term “Hollywood” could be considered is as a resort city also named “Hollywood” located in southeastern Florida.
The Ohio Constitution complements the federal structure of government in the United States very well. Both the Ohio Constitution and US Constitution share very similar structures, powers, and relationships. This should be no surprise as state and federal governments are ran somewhat similarly. The basic principle of federalism expresses that there is a system of government in which the powers of government are divided between a central government and several local governments. The US Constitution represents central or federal government, and the Ohio Constitution represents local or state government.
Question 5 The primary differences between the California State Constitution of 1849 and 1879 was that the first constitution supported a limited government that protected the people’s right and their common wealth. The second constitution contained social class struggles, anti-immigration laws and encouraged the development of the constitution we have today. California constitution was initially developed because the governor at the time wanted California to be a state. After the Gold Rush California was seen as a rich land and very capable of being its own states.
The Rule Book of Our Land The U.S. Constitution and the Oregon Constitution are quite similar, however, they have varying laws that add diversity and create a strong leadership that can act upon the many conflicts that arise. Oregon is a state that lies within the nation. It's leading structure has many concepts that can be found with in the U.S. Constitution. For example, each share a preamble, which is an opening line stating the main concepts of both of their constitutions.
One of the most noticeable differences between Arizona State’s Constitution and that of the United States would be the length of the document itself. When states joined the union they submitted themselves to the United States Constitution. Article One, Section eight of the United States Constitution established the expressed powers which the federal government solely holds (U.S. Const. Article 1). While the Tenth Amendment stipulates the reserved powers that each individual state retains (U.S. Const.
The California State Capitol I am doing the State Capitol of California. The California State Capitol is where the government's office is and all the other representatives work. It is located in Downtown Sacramento. It was built with neoclassical style with many features found on ancient Greek and Roman buildings. The Monterey Capital was the State Capitol of California from 1848-1849.
8. Why did southerners object to California’s admission as a free state? The southerners objected to California’s admission as a free state because it would destroy the delicate equilibrium in the senate, perhaps forever. Potential slave territory under the American flag was running short and agitation had already developed in the territories of New Mexico and Utah for admission as non-slave states. The fate of California might well establish a precedent for the rest of the Mexican Cession territory, an area purchased largely with Southern blood.
However significantly differences in both constitution is Arizona allowing persons to have access by changing legislation through ballot initiatives, and recall of judges. Additionally, a differences is the U.S. constitution has rights that pertains
The U.S constitution and NYS constitution are similar regarding separation of powers divided among the executive, legislation and judicial and were the intention of establishing local authorities to protect people ’s right. As Bowman state, state constitution represents the fundamental laws of that state, which provide a set of rules, regulations, and procedures (Bowman 47-48). These constitutions were designed similar to the US, therefore transferring over its strengths and weakness. In NYS constitution, the legislation lies with the senate and assembly, the governor holds the executive power, but it does not specify it judicial roles, except for the court systems (Pecorella and Stonecash 106 and 113).
To begin a constitution is the fundamental laws of a state which sets out how that state will be organized and the powers and authorities of government between different political units and citizens. The United States Constitution was created to overcome the Articles of Confederation weaknesses, to offer centralization, and to have more power in the government. Where in the Texas Constitution they wanted to try to avoid and reverse some of the things that were happening and going on. Which goes to show that these two constitutions have many differences that could be used to overpower the similarities. Some of them can be pointed out in the amending process, the bill of rights, the executive branch, and also the different salaries of each.
and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both represent the principles of representative democratic government, in which power originated from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement, both provide for two branches of legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate and both request a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. They also both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government.
The Texas and Maine state constitution are both used to govern their respective states. They both limit government, separation of powers, and also they both have bill of rights that protect the rights of the people. But, in various ways, the documents have key differences that distinguishes one from
State constitutions grant powers that are no limited where the U.S. constitution’s main purpose was to limit powers. State constitutions often have longer documents, as said above; the U.S. constitution is a basic outline, where the state constitution has a more specific outline that acquires more documentation. The U.S. constitution has changed only 27 times over the past two centuries, where the state constitution has room for improvement and is always changing. The U.S. has a representative democracy system that rejects direct democracy as a form of government. The states however believed that those types of constitutional arrangements were simply obsolete and wanted to give the chance for citizens to have a chance to participate in the creating of laws.
My Coke Bottle I have been lucky enough to live a very privileged life. My parents both work hard to provide an upper middle class lifestyle for me and my siblings. We live in a spacious house in a quiet suburban neighborhood. I have attended private school my entire life.
Let’s begin with the very beginning The Preamble. The Missouri Constitution and United State Constitution start off with the preamble, explaining the people’s rights, as well as providing guidelines on how the government will be run. Both constitutions contain the bill of rights. The United States constitution Bill of Rights contain the first ten amendments, whereas Missouri has thirty-four sections. Together they have in common an executive, judicial, and legislative section.
