Essay On The Hunger Games Catching Fire

2092 Words9 Pages

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire Introdustion to Political Science : Movie Review Anggun Dewi Astuty The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is the second movie of The Hunger Games series. The background of the story is dystopian future, where a totalitarian country named Panem was created from post-revolution of North America . Early in the history, there are 13 districts, but District 13 led a rebellion against the Capitol (Panem Government) and lost. It led to the destruction of District 13, and punishment to all of its allies . The punishment comes in a form of oppression and limitation. It also led to the creation of an annual event called, “The Hunger Games” where every district has to send 2 representatives to fight against each other in a specific …show more content…

This method actually can be advantageous to use as a way to ward off any revolutions. However, just like double-edged sword, inflicting too much fear can result in public hatred toward the government. If that happened, then it would be no surprise if the people would organize a rebellion This principle goes hand in hand with what Machiavelli wrote in his book, The Prince. Taken from chapter XVII, He said: “(…)a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred;(…)” I think this is where the Panem government went wrong with its strategies. The fact that the cruelty inflicted upon the people by the government is way past its limit that the people could not help but think that this is enough. If only the Panem government did not overdo its deterrence politic, lessen its rigidity and cruelty or even show a bit mercy, it can brought back, possibly not trust, but at least tolerance from its people. These could lead into the preservation of power held by the government. After all, as it is wise to think that mercy should be given once in a while to win its