ipl-logo

Essay On Truth In Sentencing

1001 Words5 Pages

Why is it that the amount of time that offenders serve is shorter than what they were sentenced to? Why are some prisoners entitled to parole while others must stay in prison to serve their sentence? Well thats because prison crowding, good-time reductions, and earned-time incentives lead to early release of prisoners. Many States have responded by enacting restrictions on early release. In result “truth-in-sentencing” laws were created, so that it could make it a requirement for offenders to serve a good portion of their sentence imposed by the court before becoming eligible for parole or release.

The first law that had required truth-in-sentencing in the United States was passed by Washington in 1984. In 1994, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act created the Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth in Sentencing program.

Truth-in-sentencing is defined as policies and legislation that look to abolish or set aside parole so that convicts must serve the period to which they were sentenced to. Truth-in-sentencing had gained momentum in the 1990s. To provide States with incentives to pass truth-in-sentencing laws, the U.S. Congress authorized …show more content…

Eleven States embraced truth-in-sentencing laws in 1995. According to an article on genfkd.org in 2002 a study was directed while states were receiving truth-in-sentencing changes to perceive how the laws would influence jail population. The study found that prison sentences for violent offenders increased in every state that passed TIS legislation. Most States target violent offenders under truth-in-sentencing laws. However, the definition of truth-in-sentencing varies among the States, as do both the percentage of the sentence that must be served, and the crimes covered by the laws. In most states they require that at least 50 to 100 percent of a minimum sentence be

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Sentencing Reform Act Of 1984

461 Words | 2 Pages

“The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984” The article, “The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984” (2015), written by Eric Girault, persuades the audience that the enactment of the law did not reduce crime in societies, but was misappropriated, which caused a negative impact on families and their communities. Girault describes this by sharing his personal anecdote on receiving a harsh prison sentence for a non-violent crime as a first time offender. He uses trustworthy resources in order to substantiate his claim. Girault’s intended audience for this piece of writing is the general public, specifically those that lack knowledge of the law and its due process.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Indeter Eliminate Sentencing

377 Words | 2 Pages

In past times, the process of sentencing offenders generally only involved judicial determination, know as indeterminate sentencing. Within the last two decades, there has been a decline in this form of sentencing due to various concerns. Prior to the establishment of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (1987), judges decided criminal sentences by evaluating facts of the case such as the particular offense and the offender’s past history. The judge would determine a “fair” sentence, with the only requirement that the sentence was within a statutory range. Issues started to arise such as the fact that the ranges would quite broad, such as not more than fives years, not more than twenty years, etc.

Read More

Three-Strikes Law

1149 Words | 5 Pages

Three-Strikes Law It is my intention to establish a relationship between the three strikes law and retention rates of prisoners incarcerated for low level offenses. Before I begin to discuss the three-strikes law, it is imperative that I give some background information on sentencing guidelines. During the 1970 's the incarceration sentences imposed were indeterminate, meaning the judge had the discretion to sentence an offender on a case by case basis and sentencing a person to state prison or county jail was supposed to be to rehabilitate that person so he/she could re-enter society. Often time’s prisoners were sentenced to different amounts of time for similar offenses.

Read More

Why Prison Industrial Complex Is Unfair

692 Words | 3 Pages

This connects back to the claim because , this is unfair , people are getting sentences as if they committed murders and other violent charges. Imagine if you stole from the store and got 40 years without parole

Read More

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Essay

1434 Words | 6 Pages

 Mandatory minimum sentencing policies were set into action with good intentions, but the law did not turn out as expected. The mandatory minimum sentencing acts were created to provide equality that every offender of the particular crime will serve the same punishment. This ensures that there will be no bias. They were expected to lower crime rates, because people will possibly think twice before committing a crime if the mandatory minimum sentence is five year or if they have been convicted before, they will not want to be incarcerated again for double the time. Judges cannot change the sentence.

Read More

Sentencing Guidelines In The Criminal Justice System

1427 Words | 6 Pages

Sentencing Guidelines are a set of rules used by judges in the criminal justice system in the United States. The sentencing guidelines were first established in Massachusetts in 1994. When the sentencing guidelines were established, its main goal was to "promote truth in sentencing by developing a set of guidelines that was appropriate in consideration to the crime the individual had committed." (Massachusetts Sentencing Guidelines, February 1998, the Honorable Robert A. Mulligan, Chairman). There are ten steps that are included in the sentencing guidelines.

Read More

Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Sentencing Essay

945 Words | 4 Pages

Evaluate the effectiveness of sentencing and punishment as a means of achieving justice. The Australian criminal justice system is moderately effective in relation to sentencing and punishment as a means of achieving justice for offenders, victims and society. Sentencing and punishment is a key process utilised to enforce legislation, resolving and deterring criminal actions. Its effectiveness in upholding the interests of society is determined by the ability of enforcement to consider specific and general deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and incapacitation.

Read More

Truth In Sentencing

1102 Words | 5 Pages

Previous policies which reduced the amount of time an offender served on a sentence, such as good behavior, earned-time and parole board release, are restricted or eliminated under truth-in-sentencing laws. The definition of truth in sentencing varies among the States, as do the percent of sentence required to be served and the crimes covered by the laws. Most States have targeted violent offenders under truth in sentencing law. A few States, such as Florida, Mississippi, and Ohio, require all offenders to serve a substantial amount of their sentence before they can be eligible for

Read More

Essay On Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

1798 Words | 8 Pages

Defined as a public policy that imposes an outlined amount of prison time based on the crime committed and the defendant’s criminal history, these sentences dictate that a judge must enact a statutory fixed penalty on individuals convicted of certain crimes, regardless of extenuating circumstances. Such laws have removed discretionary sentencing power from judges, instead focusing on severe punishments in line with national drug and crime concerns. While the original goal of mandatory minimum sentences was to deter potential criminals, reduce drug use, control judicial prudence, the policy has had extreme consequences such as sentencing imbalances and

Read More

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Essay

701 Words | 3 Pages

Offenders also have an opportunity to get time reduced off their conviction by participating in educational programs and community services. Second, indeterminate sentencing is enforced through releasing an incarcerated offender by a parole board that can be revoked for violating those conditions. In indeterminate sentencing, punishments are generally fit the criminal rather than the crime they are committed are convicted of. Third, the mandatory sentences are those that are required by law under certain circumstances such as conviction of a specified crime or of a series of offenses. By 1994, all 50 states had authorized several mandatory minimum sentencing laws.

Read More

Essay On Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

493 Words | 2 Pages

The minimum mandatory sentencing guidelines do not provide the opportunity for plea bargaining or allow for the separation of the offense into different degrees of the crime. Age of the defendant, the first time being in trouble with the law, entering into rehabilitation or other surrounding circumstances cannot be part of the sentencing factors. The result is an increasing prison population creating higher costs without solving the underlying

Read More

Fair Sentencing Argumentative Essay

918 Words | 4 Pages

Since crack cocaine and powder cocaine were undistinguishable prior to the enactment of the act and with no research to show one is worse than the other, the decision to label crack cocaine “the worst” of the two was based off of the pretence of “fixing” a rising drug problem. It seemed to be a “Band-Aid” fix meant to deter individuals from committing crimes involving crack cocaine by setting absurd sentences and using those individuals as the “poster” children for the law. Unfortunately, it seemed to have fallen on deaf ears and into the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” mind frame within Congress and amongst politicians for far to long. The Fair Sentencing Act seems to be derived using the enlightenment model.

Read More

Sociological Perspectives On Deviance

1122 Words | 5 Pages

Adding impetus to this belief is the idea of revenge; revenge against those who would dare violate the norms of society. Politicians, recognized the popularity of the Public’s desire for vengeance, are encouraged to promote tougher sentencing programs. Adding to the desire for longer prison sentences is the feeling that people are safer from criminals while the latter are in prison. Thus, the increase in the number of persons in prison is a reflection of tougher sentencing laws and not, as the public may believe, of increasing crime rates. Yet when one considers the high rates of repeated criminal behavior despite severe punishment, it must be concluded that there is little or no relationship between incarceration and crime reduction.

Read More

Mandatory Drug Laws Pros And Cons

992 Words | 4 Pages

In the United States during the 1980’s, crime rates were at an all time high. To combat this, many states passed Mandatory Minimum Sentencing laws. These laws have been the object of an astronomical amount of criticism for almost the past three decades. A majority of these laws are unjust, but few can be beneficial to our society. Originally created to be a deterrent against crime, Mandatory Minimum Sentences are now a powerful representative of the United States prejudice justice system.

Read More

Goals Of Sentencing Essay

1306 Words | 6 Pages

There’s a reason there isn’t chaos running in our streets. That’s because as society we have rules you must follow and if these rules are broken there are punishments. Sentencing is act declaring a punishment that is usually decided by a sentencing authority, such as a judge. As society we have goals when sentencing offenders. There are many goals with sentencing, but the three important ones are punishment, making sure that an offender understand there are consequences when breaking the law, incapacitation to make sure the offender doesn’t re-offend and rehabilitation, to try and change the offender and make a law-abiding person.

Read More

More about Essay On Truth In Sentencing

Related Topics

Open Document