Victoring Schools
(Three Analyst of victoring schools uses hard times and Jane Erie)
Is Victoring Schools a good thing or bad thing? I think in both Hard Times and Jane Erie they don’t let them use creativity. They also have a school that is strict on rules and they don’t want wonder they want facts and it’s not the best school to go to. It’s also a story about being trained or most being slaves to only learn one thing. In the books of Hard Times and Jane Erie there are three analyst in both of the stories.
Now the first analyst in both of these stories is going to be no creativity is allowed. Victoring schools are schools that use no creativity and these stories show it because everything is demanding and no creativity is allowed. In Hard Times it says that “In this life, we want nothing but facts, sir; nothing but Facts!” and in Jane Erie Charlotte says “Burns, I insist on your holding your head up: I will not have you before me in that attitude.” Now as you see they don’t want you to do what you want to do, you do what they say and straight forward. For creativity it’s bad in these stories but now the next thing about these stories is they have strict rules and stuff you have to do.
…show more content…
These stories might not have creativity in them but the next worse thing is going to be, strict rules. In this two story’s they show a lot of rules they have to obey like for instance, in Hard times they say “We don’t want to know anything about that, here. You mustn’t tell us about that, here. Your father breaks horses, don’t he?” In the Jane Erie story she says “Hardened Girl! Exclaimed Miss Scatcherd, nothing can correct you or your slatternly habits: carry the rod away”. Now strict rules aren’t bad because some rules are to help you other rules that are too much, like be home before 5 like really. Now after strict rules the next one is going to be, being train or slaves kind