ipl-logo

Essay On Washington Dc Statehood

1036 Words5 Pages

Washington D.C. Statehood
In January of 2021, Delaware Senator Tom Carper reintroduced a bill that, if passed, would have admitted D.C. as the 51st state of the United States. The United States is divided on this topic. Some people think that it should become a state because they should have rights, while others think it is unconstitutional and, many people believe that it would cause more problems than it would solve, but the weight of the conflicts are not even. On one side of the scale there is loss of rights and taxation without representation, and on the other side of the scale there is time and work? That does not seem fair. Washington D.C. is struggling every day to get their voices heard, …show more content…

pays more in taxes than a group c of the 50 states of the United States. Yet, they still do not have representation. Statehood.DC.gov states that, “Washington’s residents pay more taxes than residents in 22 states and pay more per capita to the federal government than any state—yet they have no votes in Congress” (statehood.dc.gov 22). D.C pays more taxes than residents in 22 states; yet, those 22 states have a vote in congress and D.C. does not. Washington D.C. funds a great deal of the government, and they do not receive the benefits to the extent that the 50 states do. If D.C. is not receiving basic rights, why should they have to pay taxes? The United States is built on a democracy, which means that it is a government of the people. If it truly is a government of the people, residents of D.C. would have a say. This is taxation without representation. James Otis once said, “taxation without representation is tyranny”. Tyranny is when the government has absolute power. The government is not allowing Washington D.C. to have proper representation, which in turn is leaving residents paying taxes that they had no vote on. Long ago what is now the United States, was under British control; colonists were taxed without a vote on the taxation, and they fought for their rights. By allowing D.C. to be taxed without a vote, the government is following in the footsteps of those who wronged them. However, taxation without representation is not the only reason that …show more content…

has a population that is greater than or equal to those of states who receive representation. According to the ranking of the states population in 2020 organized by infoplease.com, The District of Columbia has a population that is greater than both Vermont and Wyoming. Yet, both of those states receive a vote in Congress and D.C. does not. As of 2020, Washington D.C. had a population of 689,545 people. Meanwhile, Vermont had a population of 643,077 and Wyoming had a population of 576,851 people.This proves that The District of Columbia has enough people to become a state. D.C. is home to over 689,545 people who all have jobs that all work towards making the United States a better country. Whether this is healthcare, education, retail, food, hospitality, manufacturing, construction, or other services , they are all contributing to the success of our nation. Washington D.C. has a population great enough for a state and allowing it to become a state would grant many benefits. By not allowing D.C. to become a state, those 689,545 people are not getting heard. Based on the information from census.gov, Washington D.C.’s black or African-American community makes up 45.8% of the district's total population. By not allowing these voices and this community to be heard the United States is taking major steps back from equality. If the District of Columbia became a state, these voices would be heard and the United States would be on its way towards a country with more

Show More
Related
823 Words | 4 Pages

They argued that as a sovereign state they could tax and control business inside their borders. Also they claimed that taxing banks was necessary to control and prevent any possible financial abuses. Furthermore, they argued that if the federal government had regulations on state banks Maryland could have regulations on the federal banks. Lastly, they argued that there was no authority included in the Constitution to charter a national bank, causing the Bank of the United States to be unconstitutional. Maryland imposed a tax on all the banks not chartered by the state.

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

Also, each state had one vote in the national Congress regardless of the state’s population. Even

Read More
1240 Words | 5 Pages

D.C constituents do not have any representation the U.S Senate and only has a delegate that is not allowed to vote on the House floor,

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

The United States’ Constitution follows federalism, which is the division of power between state governments and the national government. Federalism is important to the Constitution because it helps prevent centralized power and allows the states flexibility to solve issues within their own states. Within federalism the states have been referred to as “Laboratories of democracy.” This term was coined by Justice Louis D. Brandeis in the New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann Supreme court case in 1932. His term made the states seem like a laboratory to experiment different policies that would have no effect on the whole country.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution has provided Article 1, Section 2 that states, Representatives… shall be appointed… according to… (population)…. The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative; and until (a census is taken within three years) the state of New Hampshire shall be entitled to three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode Island… one, Connecticut five, New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three. ”(Source: Constitution of the United States of America, 1787.)

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the writing of “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau often referred back to his idea that he supported which was “That government is best which governs not at all.” (Thoreau) In the passage, Thoreau believed that the government does not have a conscience. He talked about not wanting to pay the government poll tax, which in result, caused him to be thrown into jail. A poll tax is just a tax on a person for existing, therefore, everyone had to pay the same amount regardless of the value of their possessions.

Read More
188 Words | 1 Pages

Then, representatives from the large states argued that that was not fair either, because the larger states embodied more people so they felt they should have much more voice. During this time, there was a lot of back and forth because of conflicting terms. Finally, a conclusion was made by Roger Sherman that for the

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

One state, big or small, would only have one vote to decide. I believe this is fair in these circumstances because that way the smaller states could not be outvoted by the larger, seemingly more powerful states. Lastly, the Congress is checked and balanced by the states and people. The states were afraid of a strong national government, because the congress might be able to control the people. To ensure their protection, they made Congress weak, with little

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Booker T. Washington believed that in order to eventually achieve racial equality African

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

Alanna Bowers July 12, 2017 Chapter 5 "The Equality of Innocence: Washington, D.C.," When thinking of Washington DC, you tend to picture historical buildings. In chapter 5 it goes into a lot of various aspects. “How can we achieve more equity in education in America?” I personally think America is not the place where it strives to be. We have so many drop outs, kids being left behind etc.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

That was one of the main things that the founding fathers argued about, weather we should have a strong central, make the constitution, or make the states keep most of the power. This caused them to separate into two groups the federalist and the anti federalist which argued to how the country should be ran. The Federalist believed they should have a strong central government one way of doing that is taxing the public, while the anti federalists wanted to keep power in the state and the local government. Both sides did provide good arguments, but without the federalist wouldn't have taxes. Many people think we should not have taxes, but their couldn't be a worse idea then these.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Smaller states are greatly favored by The Electoral College which is unjust. It shows a clear amount of bias which goes against The Electoral College’s point of equality and correctness. It directly undermines bigger states and stops democracy from being fully

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Washington appears to make some compromises in his argument. His speech is actually called the "Atlanta Compromise." He says that "in no way have the value and manhood of the American Negro

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

In Document D, we are shown an example in which we can visually see how one citizens vote weighs more heavily than others depending on the state. While Illinois has a larger population than all twelve states and D.C. depicted

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

In Document D, it says, “The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand but each state shall have at least one representative… The Senate of the United States shall be composed by the legislatures thereof for six years, and each

Read More

More about Essay On Washington Dc Statehood

Related Topics

Open Document