The prospect of the atomic bomb was considered to be problematic in the face of Judeo-Christian morality. What were some rationales for religious or moral opposition for the bombs? What influence did the possibilities of nuclear war have on religion and morality? Many Americans were celebrating the days’ after war was ended but not all American’s were proud about the outcome of the war. Fred Eastman of the Chicago Theological in Seminary was one of these people. Eastman thought about the innocent’s people especially the children’s who were killed during the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The poet Randall Jarrell felt rotten of how America’s reverberation of the bombings at the cities of Japan. He mentioned to his friend that he was …show more content…
The early bombing in 1946 was the birth of “religious awakening” and a reaffirmation of Christian values” that will span aside the fallacy, pragmatism, and political radicalism of the prewar years. Catholic moral corresponded that no matter what the result of the war, at the end of the day killing innocent people during the bomber will always going to be murder. The atomic attack on civilian population would fall under the terror bombing. Catholic and Protestant drew back a classify moral judgmental use of atomic bombs under any circumstances. Enemy must be targeted not civilians under morally defensible situation only. The cautious awe bombing of civilians, and the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had drawn back clear-cut accusation of the atomic bomb as instrument of war, and accept moral legitimacy to the disciplinary use of atomic weapons under positive conditions. This leads to the agreement and policies for the future generations. The harrowed of the atomic era when it comes to values and attitudes were still in a very sensitive stage, the American leaders failed to deliver a fair and absolute no to these new instrument of mass