ipl-logo

Ethan Couch Should Be Tried As Adults

574 Words3 Pages

Imagine you were on the side of the road and a car ran into you. In 2013, ‘affluenza’ teenage, Ethan Couch was sentenced to a drunk driving accident by killing four people on the side of the road. Ethan Couch should be tried as an adult with a lower sentence and therapy because of the severity of the crime, their mental health, and it is in best interest for them and society.

Ethan Couch should be tried as an adult with a lower sentence and therapy because of the severity of the crime. (Hanna 1). “2013 drunk-driving crash that killed four people and seriously injured two others.” This states Ethan Couch was drunk and killed four people that were on the side of the road fixing their car. Second, “Three hours after the crash, tests showed Couch had a blood alcohol content of 0.24, three times the legal limit.” Couch was really drunk and should not have been driving that night. Couch was under the legal age and it was three times higher. In conclusion, Couch should be tried as an adult because of the severity of the crime. …show more content…

(Kasperkevic 2). “The Texas teen who used the now infamous ‘affluenza’ defense after killing four people in a drunk driving car accident will serve nearly two year in jail.” This says that Couch was drunk so did not know what he was thinking. He was also over by 3 times the legal drinking limit. Next, “After his defense team argued that he suffered from ‘affluenza.’ This means he was very wealthy and his parents never taught him responsibility and the difference of what is right and wrong. As a result, Couch should be tried as an adult because of their mental

Open Document