ipl-logo

Ethical Dilemmas: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

1990 Words8 Pages

The Decision to Drop the Bomb

In the Battle of Okinawa 1941, Japanese Kamikaze suicide pilots targeted the US in Hawaii’s Pearl Harbor. Over 2,400 American and British lives were taken from this world, an additional 1,178 wounded. The President of the United States, Harry Truman, was faced with an ethical dilemma of whether to use the atomic bomb against Japan that could end WWII. My goal is to try to answer this moral question using the philosophical views on the morality of Held, Kant, Aristotle, and Mill. I will also explain why I believe Kant’s theory is the most appropriate theory when answering moral questions in general.

I believe that, although difficult, President Truman made the correct decision in deploying the atomic bomb on Japan. My opinion falls in line with Mill’s moral theory of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory that focuses on the use of maximizing one’s utility for the best consequences for the …show more content…

Aristotle, like Kant, believed pleasure or happiness should not be the motivating force behind moral actions. Aristotle believed happiness is only acquired through one’s virtue. He believes that “virtue is a mean between two vices, the one involving excess, the other deficiency”(140). Aristotle’s meaning of extreme is to overcompensate by taking excessive measures to fix a certain situation. To be deficient, would be either not do anything at all or the least possible action that would produce little or no result. Vice is that action in the middle that is rational and through which produces the greatest results. However, I do not see how this could undermine my answer. I believe doing nothing would have been deficient as it would not have prevented the attack from happening again. To be extreme would be to continue fighting after the enemy as already given up as this would no longer be

Show More
Related
882 Words | 4 Pages

The United States and Japan fought in World War II during 1941 to 1945. Japan planned to expand their land and gain resources- which led them to invade China whom was an ally of the U.S. In result, the United States cut off the supply of oil to Japan. On December 7th 1941, Japan’s air force did a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor because that is where their military base is located.

Read More
1086 Words | 5 Pages

Harry S. Truman and His Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Harry S. Truman once said, “Carry the battle to them. Don’t let them bring it to you.” In World War II, that is exactly what he did. While Japan was breaking treaties and fighting with allied countries, the United States was developing a powerful weapon that would cripple Japan and end World War II.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Evaluate and discuss President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan during World War II, which ultimately killed ten of thousands of Japanese citizens. I researched the different views that people have dealt with this subject. On August 6, 1945, American bomber Colonel Paul Tibbets dropped more than a 9,000-pound uranium-235 bomb known as “Little Boy” on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Within seconds, the bomb killed 80,000 people, with tens of thousands dying weeks afterwards due to wounds obtained from the blast and radiation poisoning.

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

I believe Truman was right in his actions of commencing the dropping of weapons of mass destruction against the Empire of Japan. While morally it may have been carried out in a better way, that's a debate for a different time. There are three reasons I would like to clarify to show why I believe it was the right decision. The Japanese did not believe in surrender.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

In an attempt to get Japan to surrender to the Allies, in August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the nation. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. Although these bombs did contribute to Japan’s surrender and the end of the war, the use of this atomic weapon was an irrational and horrible decision. The United States should have abstained from using the two atomic bombs on Japan for the sake of civilian lives and possible alternatives to their decision. These bombs not only had detrimental effects on Japan, they also led to an arms race amongst several nations.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

On the morning of April 6th, 1945, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, America dropped a bomb developed to destroy homes on Hiroshima, Japan. Instantly, 18,000 people were killed, and around 400,000 more died from radiation effects afterward. Nine days later, on April 15th, Japan surrendered and the war between Japan and America ended. With many American people questioning if the bomb was needed to end the war, America released an article stating that the bomb was a necessary evil. But, many still wonder whether or not America should have dropped the atomic bomb.

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

Aristotle does not have a true ideal of happiness. However, excellence in life is a state of being happy most of the time. Therefore if we strive to be excellent, happiness should follow. Aristotle also has ideals about balance. To not over do things and to keep ideals in check.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

As I began reading Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant claims that the NLF of the CI tests for moral worth. In the second section of the book, Kant begins to explain the categorical imperative as the opposite of as hypothetical imperative identifying situations for which each imperative would fall. Explaining that a hypothetical imperative is only followed in certain situations as a means to something else while the CI is followed unconditionally no matter the situation “as good in itself” and to its own end. In this paper, I intend to show what the NLF has to do with testing moral worth and how the criteria are a formidable way to judge morality. I plan on completing this by quoting and analyzing relative information on the

Read More
136 Words | 1 Pages

If we accept these as the principles underlying ethical review, then it follows that ethical review must be applied to all types of research, beyond just those which contain human or animal participants. This is because the aim of a research project can be harmful to mankind even if that project has no need of human or animal participation in its testing. For example, consider the Manhattan project. This was a research project centred around mathematics, advanced physics and engineering.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

As all the world has known, the biggest atomic bomb in warfare history by the end of World War 2 is the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima that hit on August 9th, 1945 by the direct order of our 33rd president of The United States Of America; Harry S. Truman. He thought this bomb would bring a close ending of the war (World War 2) and it definitely did but it was too much to handle afterwards when it hit. There was no choice for Truman because there was no other way to bring the war into a close. It was the last call, but they didn’t realize that after they released the bomb, it was hard to decide whether it was a mistake or the right decision. The bomb killed innocent people of 199,000 (plus more).

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

Aristotle understands happiness to be the central purpose of human life and a goal in itself, which we should strive for. However, for Aristotle, happiness depends on the cultivation of virtue. In order to live a happy life, one must fulfill a wide variety of conditions. In Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle pursues an answer to the question of “What is the ultimate purpose of human existence?” He wants to find out what the ultimate end goal is, for which we should direct all of our activities.

Read More
1330 Words | 6 Pages

Meanwhile, moral virtue trains our will and desires. This can be obtained only through practice and developing habits. Aristotle’s big argument is that virtues are always means between extremes. What he suggests by this is that any type of excess or deficiency is harmful to the soul. Moral virtue aims for the relative mean.

Read More
240 Words | 1 Pages

In the reading, “Virtue," Aristotle argues that humans ultimately want to live a happy and well-lived life (pp. 310-311), and the main way humans achieve this is through virtue (pp. 311-312), which serves as a mean to the extremes of excess and the extreme of deficiency (pp. 315-317).   One of the author’s main reasons to support his view is that human happiness is the highest good for all people, but the definition as to what happiness is varies (pp. 310). Aristotle considers virtue an activity of the soul, as it is the means of obtaining happiness (pp.312). Another main reason Aristotle presents to support his view is that people look at those who live a good, virtuous life and emulate those virtuous acts so they too could live a well-lived

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

There Aristotle points out that majority of people identifies happiness with pleasure, «which is the reason why they love the life of enjoyment»1 . However, a pursuit neither of pleasure nor of wealth should become an aim of humanity. On the contrary, for Aristotle happiness is virtue activity which means that in order

Read More
1263 Words | 6 Pages

The best way to obtain happiness is to cultivate a virtuous character. Of the two kinds of virtue he recognizes, intellectual and moral, moral virtue is not surprisingly the one to focus on in order to develop a virtuous character. According to Aristotle, while we are all born with the capacity to be virtuous, actually being virtuous is like a skill like carpentry that we need to learn and practice to be good at. To be virtuous one must avoid extreme in actions and emotions.

Read More

More about Ethical Dilemmas: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

Related Topics

Open Document