ipl-logo

Ethical Issues In College Sports

909 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Conclusion how to make college student athletes be paid

In 2014, there were over 460,000 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) student athletes competing in 23 sports in the United States. The total annual NCAA College revenue was $10.6 billion. The NCAA annual revenue generated from tickets sales was $5.6 billion. The NCAA annual revenue from rights agreements, which ranges from broadcasting, social media and sponsorships, came up to $433 million. These figures represent the economics of the NCAA, a commercialized industry (NCAA Statistic Verification, 2015). Since its introduction in 1906, the NCAA, a once non-profit organization was set in place to protect student athletes and apply rules and regulations for the benefit of college sports. Regrettably in recent years the NCAA has been …show more content…

These figures and concerns are well supported and researched on a large scale by scholars (Cronk, Lawrence & Soederbaum, 2013).
Unethical conduct or Bylaw 10 was set in place by the NCAA to ensure that faculty and student-athletes conduct themselves in compliance with NCAA, conference and institution (NCAA, 2013). Over a period of seven years we have witnessed several high profile cases involving bylaw 10 violations. Weston (2011) recants the violation of bylaw 10 with former University of Southern California (USC) standout Reggie Bush who accepted explicit benefits throughout his amateurism campaign. Dohrmann & Evans (2013) acknowledge Weston (2011) with the ongoing violations at Oklahoma State University involving violations that date back as far as 2000. Sturgis (2011) also provides further evidence by discussing the masses of undocumented bylaw 10 violations by Boise State. The NCAA clearly has a problem with unethical conduct and bylaw 10. Why the NCAA may argue and assess the blame of bylaw 10 violations towards student athletes and institutions, there are still concerns that the NCAA is conducting acts of unethical conduct that go beyond the …show more content…

Cronk (2013) investigate approaches provides an outlook concerning the legal case involving former student athletes who want compensation from the NCAA for using their likeness, name and image. Cronk (2013) quickly establishes that the NCAA has in some form violated the rights of the students by obtaining revenue from their identities which has significant value (p. 164-165). Cronk (2013) also establishes that the student athlete is the victim here and is often left to suffer due to not being compensated for the use of their identity but under a legal documentation (form 11-3a) which provides the NCAA unethical right to use student athletes’ identities there is no justice. Soederbaum (2013) acknowledges Cronk’s (2013) stance with a reflection on Johnny Manziel former Texas A&M quarterback who during his Heisman campaign generated over $70 million in revenue for Texas A&M athletics but was brought under investigation for his involvement in signing memorabilia consisting of his likeness. Soederbaum & Cronk (2013) also share similar concerns involving the NCAA monopolizing off of students athletes however Soederbaum (2013) challenges Cronk (2013) by simply suggesting a new dictation for amateur and professional status rather than Cronk’s (2013) outlook on a system of legal pension . Either

Show More
Related
905 Words | 4 Pages

Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Illegal or iniquitous? That is the question many are asking in regards to current news of NCAA. Decades of indistinct unethical and deceitful behavior from the NCAA has come to a halt as of September 26, 2017 when charges were announced, light is being shed on the NCAA scandal that not only involves college athletes and their families but also coaches, financial advisors and executives. The scandal deals with corruption, fraud, and bribery schemes. It is known that 25 percent of the teams ranked in the top sixteen are linked to the ongoing corruption investigation led by the U.S attorney’s office in New York.

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

Annotative bibliography: Should college athletes be paid? Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is allowed to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. It is very problematic rules and many people and professional do not agree with these rules. Despite all the researches that suggested that NCAA the Universities makes multimillions dollars a year from college’s sport, the NCAA still insisting on applying the rule that no college athletes should be compensated about their effort and time.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

We all come from somewhere. Our story defines who we are, what we stand for, what we are built upon. In the debate whether collegiate athletes should be paid it is easy to get lost in the numbers and dollar signs. In “The Shame of College Sports”, Taylor Branch took a step back to evaluate the values and conditions that the NCAA was built upon. Telling the story through historical moments and recounting important lawsuits, Taylor gives a biased rendition and account of the NCAA’s upbringing.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

The NCAA says that they don’t want to pay college athletes because of their scholarships. As the money keeps flowing more and more each and every year, it comes with more arguments about the athletes getting the money that they deserve. Sounds as if college athletes are blindly signing a sheet of paper and the NCAA has an evil smirk saying “You have no idea what you’ve gotten yourself into”. A court case had also gone down about a young college athlete and a car dealership. The dealership was using the athletes to make more sales with his cars and was doing behind the athletes back without

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

Money. Unlike in the 1920s, most professional athletes are making millions of dollars. However, despite new Name Image and Likeness (NIL) deals, college athletes are bribed with enough money to set themselves up for life. Corruption in sports is a serious issue undermining the integrity of the game and must be stopped by prohibiting college sports betting and allowing student-athletes to get paid. Sports wagering can adversely impact student-athletes

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

The Injustice of the NCAA The NCAA is making an extremely large profit on the amateur athletic performance of student athletes, without them seeing a penny. The NCAA earns around 1.5-2.0 billion dollars on average every year (compared to the NFL at 1.0-2.0 billion dollars as well). They are additionally qualifying themselves as a non-profit organization, therefore not having to pay taxes on any of the money they receive. College athletes should be able to receive an allowance, besides the scholarships they receive, because many students struggle to get through the week, paying for food, clothing, and other essential items. Student athletes, as stated in bylaw 15.01.2 of the NCAA handbook, are not allowed to take any handout or financial help

Read More
1944 Words | 8 Pages

Scholarships and recruiting have been around as early as the 1880s, when football went from a fun backyard family game, to a popular, profitable sport. Scholarships were funded by school’s fraternities, and the ultimate goal was to motivate players to take their game to the next level. Along with scholarships taking place, The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was introduced in 1906. According to the article “History of Sports Scholarships”, the NCAA instilled rules to protect the student athlete from exploitation, meaning that the athlete shall not be paid in any way for their talent. In his ESPN article,

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

The fight for payment of college athletes has not been quick one as more and more issues keep popping up. The NCAA has never allowed payment of its athletes, but small steps towards the overall goal has questioned the NCAA’s past. Its’ decisions has stayed constant since its founding in 1906. The first issue in this decision would not occur until 1952 when the NCAA ruled to give The University of Kentucky the ‘death penalty’ for paying their athletes. This ‘death penalty’ is a one year program ban from participation, the harshest penalty the NCAA can give.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

Millions of Americans are watching March Madness. Advertisers make millions, and so do schools and the NCAA, but not the players. Just this weekend, President Barack Obama said it's time for the NCAA to rethink the way it protects and punishes athletes. "The students need to be taken better care of because they are generating a lot of revenue. It doesn't matter whether they get cut, it doesn't matter whether they get hurt.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

The NCAA is not directly responsible for the behaviors of the student-athletes, coaches, staff, and administrators at each college or university. The way the NCAA ensure that ethical behavior is shown in all organisations is the principles of conducts of intercollegiate athletics, and by the President commission of that university or college. The NCAA expects the university or college to take the necessary actions when someone in their program is doing or be unethical. By making the university inforce the rules in a timely manner it show how serious it is when you are breaking rules, and to show that they are an “effective enforcement program” (446).

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.

Read More

More about Ethical Issues In College Sports

Related Topics

Open Document