Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Opinion on if college athletese should get paid
Opinion on if college athletese should get paid
Opinion on if college athletese should get paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
the football and basketball players are there to generate revenue for the school. ”(22) Many see that it is unfair for the main attraction to not be paid. If one were to bring in more money for
Should college football players be putting in 90 hours a week without pay? The average American full-time job is from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. five days a week. So if they get paid for 40- hour weeks shouldn’t a college football player who puts in 90 hours a week get at least a small paycheck. The average division one football player puts in 43.3 hours a week for football. Also, if you have 10 hours of class each week and you study for the recommended 4 hours for each class you have a total of 50 hours for school.
They represent the different side of the argument regarding if the college athletes should get paid or not. They giving us an example of the one who favor of paying college athletes and the arguments against, they also explain the Nine Points program re regarding the payment of College Athletes Mike Gilleran is the executive director of the institute of sports law and ethics at Santa Clara University, and he is a professor of Sports Law at the University of San Francisco in its Sport Management Graduate
Imagine living in a world where you are paid to compete in an activity that you adore at a young age. Ever since I can remember, sports have been a major part of who I am. Never did the thought cross my mind of receiving a salary before making it your career. After researching the topic, authors such as Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Ryan Swanson, and Ekow Yankah all represent different viewpoints on the controversial topic whether or not college athletes should be paid. Despite each of the authors having polar opposite views on the topic, each author is similar by using rhetorical strategies to their advantage in trying to educate and persuade their audience.
There are pros and cons he shows, it would help athletes that come from lower income families support their families. Players may stay longer and bring in more money for the schools, then it would limit corruption from scandals of coaches buying kids stuff for them to come to their school. Then there's the stance you're giving them what they deserve what they have put countless hours into. Then there's the fact that could spend their money from and irresponsibly. Then it could divide people because some player may get paid more to go to the school and athletes may never go to class because why would they if they are already getting paid to play Then it might remove their drive to compete because they are basically like a professional athlete getting paid.
Imagine if when you were choosing your college decision you thought of which school was going to pay you the most for you to play there. How, would this change your opinion on the school of whether or not you would decide to go there. College athletes should not be paid to play for schools because being paid could affect their college decisions, athletic scholarships already pay for tuition and board, and allowing schools to pay players would eventually lead to top divisions creating a monopoly of talent at a high level. Being paid to play for a college could change an athlete’s decision on where he or she decides to spend their time in college at. If the NCAA allowed colleges to pay players to play it would drastically give high profile schools
In his article "Should college athletes be paid to play?", Kenneth J. Cooper states, "These young men are laboring under strict and arduous conditions, so they really are laborers in terms of the physical demands on them while they 're also trying to go to school and being required to go to school. " This quote helps me prove that these students are actually workers that is bringing in business for the school. Athletes are the reason the fans are in the arena, the reason the school makes consistent money, and the reason they recruit
To the contrary, one could more persuasively argue that an athlete is exploited when he is expressly disallowed from realizing his value while his reputation and skill are being used to realize a profit for others. - Jay Bilas (2010), former Duke and pro basketball player, current ESPN and CBS sports analyst According to the NCAA, its version of amateurism is all that is needed to prevent the commercial exploitation of college athletes. The protectionist rationale for its concept of amateurism that has served as the foundation for the NCAA’s position on issues related to revenue-generating player compensation is imbedded in the notion that the NCAA is attempting to, in their words, “maintain a clear line of demarcation between collegiate athletics and professional sports” so as to prevent the undue exploitation of college athletes (NCAA Amateur and Membership Staff, 2010, p. 1). Note the linguistic nuance, as if simply labeling “collegiate athletics” as being distinctive from “professional sports” would be a sufficient barricade to the commercial interests that now include, in modest estimation, a 14 year, $10.8 billion contract to broadcast NCAA Division I men’s college basketball annually with CBS and Turner Sports (Schlabach, 2011); a 15-year
Should college athletes be paid it states that, “In the past 12 years, the money generated by the two sports has increased nearly 300%”, which means that with time, colleges are just earning more and more money while players aren’t being paid. Some people may argue that athletes shouldn’t be paid, because they are getting their scholarships paid for. In the article Pay to play: Should college athletes be paid it says how Athletes receive scholarships for $200,000 over 4 years. This is good for the players because scholarships can cost a heavy amount. Although, if I were Division one and I knew there was a great possibility of going to a professional league and the only reason as to why I am in that college is to get into the professional league, not for education.
The first point is even though college athletes have the same hours as a full-time job, athletes should not be paid because it would take money away from other activities. If athletes get paid $100,000 for every football player, there are usually 20 - 30 players per team. $2,000,000 to $3,000,000 goes to the football team yearly. If so much money goes to the football team, how much money does that leave for other activities? “If we pay the athletes maybe we should also do it for the first violinist in the school orchestra, or the lead actor in the theatrical productions, and perhaps popular professors allocate course enrollment slots to those students who bid the highest,” Andrew Zimbalist, sports writer.
One of the arguments people use to say paying athletes in college is that the student athletes would be irresponsible with the money they recieve. That however, is a terrible argument. Teaching students athletes/young adults how to manage their money is an essential skill that many kids do not have the ability to learn until they are out of college. If there are two children, and one gets an allowance and the other does not, the child that receives the allowance every month or week, will learn how to spend and save the money more effectively than the child that does not an allowance. Giving the child the opportunity to learn how manage their money and learning how to spend it on the correct things is important at a young age.
The NCAA has made a profit on the careers of young college athletes across all sports for decades, with players being forbidden from earning money based on their name image and likeness up until 2 years ago. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name image and likeness and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches, players’ commitment to the sport, as well as the players’ background. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name, image, and likeness, and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches. New Colorado football head coach Deion Sanders recently said during an interview when asked about scouting defensive lineman “Defensive linemen, it’s totally opposite — single mama, trying to get it, he’s on free lunch…. I’m talking about just trying to make it.
In any controversial topic there will be two sides to an argument. The opposing side in any argument will fire back with good points I’m sure, these are the big arguments individuals on the affirmative side of should College Athletes be paid like employees. First: Student Athletes bring in hundreds of thousands of dollars each year to the school so they should get a cut or a paycheck out of it. Our Response: There is no doubt big college sport teams bring in the money for their respective schools, as they should considering how much facilities for sport programs cost.
Now that would seem to be better than getting paid in some people's perspectives. Even though Posnanski is aware of the benefits the student-athletes are already getting yet he still finds a way to include this thought provoking statement, Posnanski says “The biggest argument for paying the athletes comes down to this: college players (those stars especially) are the reason why these schools are generating so much money and so they deserve a much bigger piece of the pie. These sports are about them”. Each college sports ( focusing on football and men's basketball ) earn around 50 million dollars a year.
College tuition is a big expense, as many people know, but for some people this expense may be covered by receiving a scholarship for academics and/or athletics. As a grade 12 student athlete I have been paying more attention to tuition and scholarships lately, one thing I have come to realize is; not every college or university athlete receives compensation for playing. College and university athletes typically struggle in their programs and deal with a lot of stress because of how demanding their sports and studies are, it's also extremely hard to effectively time manage and get everything done. Another thing to highlight is how difficult it is to become an athlete in a post secondary setting. An additional thought that comes to mind is what