ipl-logo

Summary Of Should College Athletes Be Paid

471 Words2 Pages
Sports writer Joe Posnanski’s article “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” argument over Dallas Morning News Editorial’s article, “paying them is fair, but it doesn't address college athletes' real need: an education” is more convincing to believe that college athletes should not be paid while receiving the benefits of a free education. DMN states that college athletes should be paid, because NCAA generate millions of income because of these players through private contracts. However, Posnanski’s claim that big time players already are paid through free college tuition, as well as covered room and board (Posnanski, 585). Even though DMN claims that college athletes go through difficult education process and may not be able to have chance to play professionally, he then correlated his source of information to the website of the NCAA, however, there is concern if this institution inflated the facts on the website (DMN). In contrast, Posnanski says argument of “College players are the reason why these schools generating so much money and they deserve a much bigger piece of the pie” is not really right. He defends his position against the argument by stating that; ask yourself if every single player in the team quit the next day and re-formed as a professional team, who will go to their game? (Posnanski, 587). Due to the fact that college athletics is for player, these teams created by colleges and players chose to go these schools and join the team.
Open Document